|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2003 Congress Abstracts101 Background/Rationale: Data suggests that 65% of breast cancer survivors
experience hot flashes, reported as severe by the majority of women. Breast
cancer treatment often results in acceleration of menopause, causing women
to experience hot flashes. Daily activity, sleep, sexuality, and mood
are impacted by the hot flash experience. Current approaches to management
of hot flashes, utilizing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions,
should be based on available data from clinical trials. Much research
has been weak in supporting various interventions and the data is mixed.
To date, there is no definitive effective treatment. Oncology advanced
practice nurses face a dilemma in choosing appropriate treatment and are
in need of guidelines to better inform their practice. 102 Elderly cancer patients have been identified as a population at greater
risk for neutropenic complications (Balducci, 2001). The elderly may have
unique challenges with daily Filgrastim therapy, including daily transportation
to the doctor’s office, potentially placing a significant burden
on the patient and caregiver, especially if the caregiver must take off
work. The oncology nurse is in a position to assess and identify elderly
patients at risk for neutropenia. We have previously reported the comparability
of pegfilgrastim, a pegylated long-acting analog of filgrastim dosed once-per-chemotherapy
cycle, and filgrastim in 2 trials of breast cancer patients receiving
doxorubicin and docetaxel, a regimen where approximately 40% of patients
experience febrile neutropenia (FN) without growth factor support (Misset,
1999). 103 Numerous attempts have been made to conduct education and outreach programs
on college campuses regarding the topic of breast cancer, and most have
fallen short of their goal. This is a challenging consumer audience to
effectively reach, who either already fears the disease so much they do
not attend educational programs or believe that they are immune or untouchable
by the disease at this point in time in their lives. 104 Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of locally advanced
breast cancer (LABC), which affects approximately 5% of women with breast
cancer. Signs and symptoms may include redness of the breast, increase
in breast size, breast induration, edema, and heaviness. Color changes
are not always bright red but may vary from reddish purple or reddish
brown to faint pink. Prompt diagnosis of IBC is often delayed because
these women present with mastitis-like symptoms and are treated with a
course of antibiotics for a presumed infection. Diagnosis may be made
more difficult because a definite mass cannot be found in many patients.
Pathologically, IBC is associated with dermal lymphatic invasion by breast
cancer cells, but this is not required for diagnosis. Education of nurses
is necessary to increase awareness of the signs and symptoms of IBC. Currently, 175,000 women undergo invasive surgery for breast cancer in
United States every year, and many require the placement of Jackson-Pratt
drains which are secured with large safety pins on the hospital gown.
The hospital gowns are tied in the back, increasing the discomfort for
breast surgery patients. The patients also experience fear that the JP
drainage tubes will be pulled out or will tug on the surgical wound site.
The papilla gown addresses these issues and attempts to remedy them. 106 Because fatigue and depression frequently correlate with one another, a common biologic pathway has been proposed for these states. This is the first study to examine how specific biologic markers, serotonin and bilirubin, are related to these states. This is a significant area for research as findings can contribute to an improved understanding of underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Components of the integrated fatigue model guided this correlational, repeated measures study at a large southwestern university cancer center. Data were collected using the standardized Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS), the Center for Epidemiologic Depression Survey (CES-D), a demographic form, and medical record data. Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (N = 11), stages I or II, and age and menopausally-matched healthy controls (N = 11) completed instruments during chemotherapy (CT) cycles 1 and 4, on day 1 before CT, and two weeks later at nadirs (T1–T4). All women were admitted days 1–3, cycles 1 and 4. Bilirubins and CBCs were drawn day 1; serotonins days 2 and 3. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in data analysis. Subjects were Caucasian (54.5%) and Hispanic (36.5%), high school educated, with a mean age of 47.5 years. Patients had significantly higher mean fatigue (PFS)(p < .0001) and depression scores (CES-D) (p = .006), and bilirubin and serotonin were significantly reduced (p < .05). Serotonin (p = .03) and bilirubin (p = .007) significantly correlated with fatigue, and serotonin significantly correlated with depression (p = .004). These differences in patients and their associated biomarkers warrant further study and underscores the need to screen for these states in practice. 108 Cancer evokes considerable stress from diagnosis through treatment, with
each patient’s trek unique. This unique response is known as “symptom
distress” and refers to the perception of discomfort as experienced
by the individual. Identification and management of patients at risk for
high levels of symptom distress are essential because higher levels of
distress have been equated with diminished self-care, altered social relationships,
and decreased adherence to treatment protocols, curtailing survival. Research indicates a decrease in chemotherapy-associated weight gain related to modern breast cancer chemotherapy. However, studies have begun to suggest that there are important body composition changes at this time. This study examined weight change during adjuvant chemotherapy, changes in body composition, and relationships between body composition and weight change. Brown’s Conceptual Framework for Cancer-Related Weight Change guided the research. This prospective, correlational study examined a convenience sample of 91 pre-menopausal women with stage I and II breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (AC, CEF, or CMF) at two clinics in Ontario. Eight AC subjects also received tamoxifen. Most had lumpectomies and stage II disease. Their mean age was 44 years (SD 5.9). Most were white, married, working, and had some post-secondary education. Data were collected before treatment began, at the start of cycles 2, 4, and 6 (if applicable), and at the end of treatment. The body composition measure was bioelectrical impedance analysis. Weights and heights were obtained using standardized techniques. Reliability and validity for all measures were well established. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression analysis. Subjects’ BMI indicated slight overweight at baseline (M = 26 kg/m2, SD 6.6). Of these, 45% were significantly overweight (M = 30.7 kg/m2, SD 7.1). Overall, the sample gained 1.4 kg (SD 3.4) during therapy. An increase or decrease of > 2.5 kg defined “weight change.” Using this definition, 55% of women maintained stable weights, while 34% gained (M = 5 kg, SD 1.4), and 11% lost weight (M = 4.2 kg, SD 1.4). Although adult weight gain is primarily associated with increased fat mass, weight gainers in this study also gained lean body mass (54% lean increase for AC, 35% for CMF, and 19% for CEF subjects). These findings lay the groundwork for targeting interventions to treatment, weight, and body composition profiles. 110 An estimated 203,500 women in the United States in 2002 will be diagnosed with breast cancer. The five-year survival rate for localized breast cancer is 97%, and the survival rate for all stages combined continues to improve. After primary therapy is completed, these women face the challenges of ongoing survival related to their symptom experience (number of symptoms [NOS], severity of symptoms [SOS], and symptom distress [SD]) associated with stage of disease (SOD) and ongoing therapy (OT). The need to examine information needs (IN) of women who are in breast cancer recovery is strongly indicated in the adjustment and quality-of-life literature. This study integrates components of Derdiarian’s (1987a, 1987b) cancer information needs model and Coping Theory (Lazarus, 1993; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). This framework suggests that dimensions of IN are related to symptom experience associated with SOD and OT among survivors of breast cancer. IN are measured as a score on the Toronto Information Needs Questionnaire – Breast Cancer (TINQ – BC) (Galloway et al., 1998). Symptom experience is measured as the incidence, severity, and distress subscale on the Breast Cancer Treatment Response Inventory (BCTRI) (Hoskins, 1990). A descriptive, correlational design will examine the relationship between IN related to symptom experience associated with SOD and OT among survivors in the recovery phase of breast cancer. A sample of 134 women diagnosed with breast cancer, who have completed primary therapy, and are in ongoing recovery is being accrued. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviation (SD), ranges, and skewness for all data will be calculated and reported. Pearson correlation matrix of IN, NOS, SOS, and SOD will be generated and examined for relevant zero-order correlations. To assess the main effects of SOD and OT, as well as their possible interaction on the other variables, four two-way analyses of variance will be performed, treating IN, NOS, SOS, and SOD each as the dependent variable. This data will identify needs specific to the growing number of breast cancer survivors in recovery. This information can be used by the oncology nurse to guide development of interventions that will address these women’s perceptions of information need. 111 This pilot study explored the feasibility of using virtual reality (VR)
as a distraction intervention with 20 women, aged 50 and older, who received
outpatient chemotherapy for breast cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.
112 Purpose/Objectives: Because early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer
is very important, this study was done to explore the factors related
to delayed health seeking behavior with regard to mammography test for
breast screening based on health belief model. 113 Feelings of distress and anxiety are common symptoms among women newly
diagnosed with breast cancer. Research reports that the most effective
psychosocial interventions for these patients include health education,
information about effective coping skills, and emotional support. 114 Purpose and Background: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine
complementary and alternative therapies (CAT) used for the side effects
experienced after conventional therapy(s) for breast cancer. Braden’s
Self-Help Model was the framework for this study (Nursing Research, 39:
42–47, 1990). The five categories of self-care activities designated
by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
were explored to improve the conceptual identification of CAT. The rates
of CAT used by women after diagnosis of breast cancer in the literature
range from 39% to 84%, which reflect different variables used for exploration
of CAT. Controlled clinical trials have generated little data on the relationship
between CAT and quality of life outcome. 115 Learning of an abnormal mammogram and having a breast biopsy are stressful events. In the literature, anxiety is often correlated to lengthy wait times and more invasive biopsy procedures. In spite of wait times less than two weeks, many women were significantly anxious when they presented for needle biopsy in our centers for breast care. The goal of this project was to find a tool that would allow for assessment of women’s levels and sources of distress. The Psychosocial Distress Thermometer and Problem List (PDT) was adapted from the NCCN Psychosocial Distress Practice Guidelines. The PDT was given to a convenience sample of 51 women to complete on the day of, but prior to their breast biopsies. In our sample, 55% of the women experienced significant distress (score of 5 or greater). Not surprisingly, the most prevalent cause of distress was emotional problems (89%). However, additional sources of distress included physical problems (61%), practical problems (46%), family problems (25%), and spiritual concerns (14%). Oncology nurses intervened with any woman indicating a distress level of 5 or greater, and made interdisciplinary referrals as needed. For most women with a benign result, the distress was relieved by knowledge of their biopsy results. Of the 45% of women who indicated a distress level less than 5, emotional problems (57%) were again the most prevalent source, followed by physical problems (52%), practical problems (26%), family problems (13%), and spiritual concerns (4%). An incidental finding was that women who requested an anti-anxiety medication prior to the procedure did not necessarily have correspondingly high distress scores on the PDT. The results demonstrated that the PDT is a usable and appropriate tool for our outpatient setting. Women appreciated and were surprised by attention to their “other” needs. Continued use of the PDT will provide consistent assessment and communication across our breast cancer treatment continuum. In addition, it will facilitate identification and early intervention for women with both benign and malignant results. 116 Sisters for Breast Health (SFBH) is an innovative community health program
whose purpose is to promote early detection of breast cancer by providing
breast health education and facilitating mammogram utilization for African-American
women over 40 who reside in South Pinellas County, Florida. Needs assessment
have determined that African-American women in South Pinellas County are
medically underserved, specifically in the area of breast health. Data
from the American Cancer Society and the tumor registry of St. Anthony’s
Health Care is consistent: African-American women have a slightly lower
incidence of breast cancer than white women, but higher mortality. Furthermore,
the American Cancer Society recommends increased participation in routine
screening mammography and detection to decrease mortality and improve
survival. 117 Quality-of-life (QOL) is an increasingly important measure for assessing cancer treatments. QOL is affected by changes in physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being. Clearly, chemotherapy is expected to produce changes in QOL, and validated tools that capture QOL changes have been used in clinical trials. One such tool, the FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General), uses a 5-point scale (“0” means “not at all” while “4” means “very much”) to assess how patients view their current condition, with questions regarding specific symptoms, concerns, and emotions. The FACT-N is a neutropenia-specific QOL tool currently being developed and validated as a companion tool to the 27-item FACT-G. Validation is an important step in the development of a QOL tool because it indicates that the survey questions capture meaningful and relevant issues specific to the topic (in this case, neutropenia), and that the tool can reasonably be expected to produce accurate responses when used in different studies. The FACT-N questions were developed after reviewing medical literature and conducting interviews with 10 clinicians, 25 patients with cyclic neutropenia, 25 with congenital neutropenia, and 25 patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). Fifty-one questions were initially generated. Twelve experts rated the items for clarity, relevance, and redundancy, and identified 19 items that came to comprise the FACT-N. In order to test reliability and validity, the FACT-N was administered to 60 chemotherapy patients. All patients completed the FACT-N at baseline, and those experiencing neutropenia received the survey again. All patients completed the FACT-N with the last chemotherapy cycle. The results suggest that the FACT-N has internal consistency, meaning that the items measure the underlying concept. Additionally, two subscales, a 7-item fatigue subscale and a 4-item worry subscale, exist within the FACT-N. Preliminary data on the relationship of FACT-N responses to neutrophil count changes during chemotherapy will be presented. In summary, the FACT-N represents the first neutropenia-specific QOL tool. It will ultimately be incorporated into oncology clinical trials, providing oncology nurses with a better understanding of the overall impact of chemotherapy on patient’s lives and the effectiveness of interventions designed to minimize this impact. 118 Introduction: Fatigue is associated with the anemia that is frequently
observed in patients with cancer, and can have a greater impact on patients
than pain, potentially decreasing emotional well-being and reducing health-related
quality of life (HRQOL) (Vogelzang 1997; Ludwig 1998). 119 Chemotherapy patients are being instructed in the neutropenic diet based on past research involving a total protective environment. There have been no studies evaluating the effects of the neutropenic diet alone in the outpatient setting. This descriptive pilot study asks 3 questions: Are outpatients receiving chemotherapy able to comply with a neutropenic diet? Is there a difference in the number of febrile admissions between compliant versus non-compliant patients? Is there a difference in the number of positive blood cultures between compliant versus non-compliant patients? Patients between 18 and 70 years old receiving outpatient chemotherapy are recruited from the Pennsylvania Hospital Joan Karnell Cancer Center and Pennsylvania Oncology and Hematology Associates. Enrollment is 12 weeks starting day 1 of cycle 1. Patients are instructed in the neutropenic diet before starting chemotherapy. Compliance assessment telephone calls are made at weeks 6 and 12. Hospital admission charts are reviewed at study completion. This study’s neutropenic diet is based on a 120-institution survey by Smith and Besser. The evaluation tool measures dietary compliance through target questions about food safety and diet restrictions utilizing the Likert scale. Admission, blood culture events, and patient perception of compliance are questioned. The content validity was established through review of the tool by a multi-disciplinary team. Descriptive statistics will be used to address the first question. Occurrence of compliance within the sample will be analyzed as both raw and frequency data. Sample demographic data will be analyzed descriptively using mean, median, mode, and standard deviation calculations. Inferential statistics will be used to address the second and third questions. T-test analysis with a p value of 0.05 will be used to determine statistically significant differences in mean number of febrile admissions and positive blood cultures between subjects who are compliant versus non-compliant. Statistically significant differences will be reported as trends for guiding future design of a broader, randomized clinical trial. Healthcare professionals may change dietary education based on compliance and outcome information from this study. 16 patients have been enrolled to date. The study will be completed by November 1, 2002. 120 Full-dose chemotherapy improves survival in early stage breast cancer (ESBC). Delivery of at least 85% of the planned dose on time (PDOT) may be necessary for an optimal outcome, yet a significant portion of ESBC patients treated in community practice do not receive this level of dose intensity. Neutropenia is often responsible for the dose delays and reductions that result in frequent failure to reach PDOT. While prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (CSF) is an alternative to dose modifications, its universal use in all patients is not considered cost-effective. Identifying patients at risk for neutropenic complications (NC) would allow targeted use of CSF, providing cost-effective protection to the patients who need it most. Silber et al. (1998) determined that the first cycle absolute neutrophil count nadir (FCANC) may be useful to stratify ESBC patients according to their risk of subsequent NC, including episodes of severe neutropenia (ANC < 500 cells/mm3) and febrile neutropenia (FN), and chemotherapy dose delays and reductions. We report on the prospective application of this risk model to determine its clinical impact in a population of ESBC patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were assigned to CSF based on their FCANC: Those with FCANC £500 cells/mm3 (high-risk patients; n = 360) received filgrastim 5 mcg/kg/day in all subsequent cycles, while those with FCANC > 500 cells/mm3 (low-risk; n = 264) received filgrastim only if they developed FN or had a neutropenia-related dose modification. Study patients were compared to 1,022 historical control ESBC patients treated with similar regimens. While most study patients (95%) received at least 85% PDOT, with no difference between the high-risk and low-risk groups, only 78.7% of the historical controls received at least 85% PDOT. Hospitalization and FN were more common in the high-risk patients compared to the low-risk patients, but were lower overall in the study patients than in the historical controls (2.9% versus 7.3%, and 7.5% versus 10.3%, respectively). These results suggest that risk model-guided prophylactic CSF use improves outcomes compared to current standard practice. Nurses can proactively evaluate an individual patient’s risk using factors such as FCANC and recommend appropriate supportive therapy to help their patients achieve optimal treatment outcomes. 121 CHOP has long been the treatment of choice for aggressive NHL. Attempts to improve upon CHOP with more complex or higher dose regimens have resulted in greater toxicity, but not greater efficacy. Maintaining CHOP dose intensity has been associated with improved survival, and it is possible that increasing the dose-intensity by decreasing the time between cycles may further improve outcomes. Recently, investigators have shown that CHOP given every 14 days with Filgrastim support is superior to standard 21-day CHOP (Blood 2001; 98:725a). In addition, adding the monoclonal antibody rituximab to standard CHOP (CHOP-R) has also been shown to improve survival (NEJM 2002; 346:235). Given these advances, the next logical step is to evaluate dose-dense CHOP-R. This phase II trial was designed to assess the feasibility of giving CHOP-R every 14 days with pegfilgrastim, rather than daily Filgrastim. Pegfilgrastim, a pegylated version of Filgrastim, is administered as a single 6 mg fixed dose just once per chemotherapy cycle. Patients with previously untreated intermediate or aggressive NHL and relapsed low-grade NHL were eligible for this study. Rituximab was given on day 1, CHOP on day 3, and pegfilgrastim on day 4, for up to 8 cycles. To date, 15 patients have entered the trial (mean age of 61, range 37–77; 8 females, 7 males); 10 have completed therapy and 5 remain in treatment. A total of 84 cycles have been administered. Eight cycles have been delayed for toxicity (grade 2 diarrhea, n = 1; grade 3 stomatitis/pharyngitis, n = 4; grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, n = 3) and 4 patients have had an episode of febrile neutropenia. Fully 90% of planned cycles were given on time, with no dose reductions, and all patients have attained a CR or near-CR status with no evidence of progressive disease. Complete data for the protocol-planned 30 enrolled patients will be presented at the meeting. These preliminary results suggest that CHOP-R can be given safely every 14 days with pegfilgrastim support. Oncology nurses may see dose-dense CHOP and CHOP-R increasingly used in practice. Data regarding the effects of pegfilgrastim with these regimens are important, as nurses will be integral in administering this therapy. 122 Neutropenia is a common side effect of cancer treatment. It is the primary dose limiting toxicity of most chemotherapy regimens often resulting in neutropenic complications such as dose delays/reductions and febrile neutropenia, which can have an overall mortality rate as high as 10%. Concern over the potential negative clinical outcomes due to neutropenic complications, the inconsistencies in nursing management of the neutropenic patient, and the lack of nursing research to guide the development of evidenced-based neutropenia standards of practice lead to the formation of the ONS Neutropenia Focus Group in 2000. The ultimate goal of this focus group is to establish a set of national evidenced-based neutropenic precaution guidelines and patient/caregiver teaching strategies. The process has at least three phases, two of which have now been completed. Phase I was a collection of information by focus group members with regard to neutropenic precautions currently utilized at various healthcare institutions. This collection of information lead to Phase II, the development of a neutropenic precautions survey. The goal of this survey was to identify the following: 1) Neutropenic precautions utilized in inpatient/outpatient settings, if any, 2) Patient care standards currently employed in various healthcare institutions, and 3) Patient/caregiver teaching strategies. The survey was sent to 1,500 randomly selected oncology nurses nationwide utilizing the ONS membership database. Returned surveys will be analyzed with the intent of sharing these results at the 2003 ONS Congress in a poster abstract format. Data available for presentation will include the most consistently utilized neutropenic precautions, associated patient care standards, and patient/caregiver educational strategies utilized in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. Analysis of the Phase II results will determine development of Phase III, including identification of nursing research opportunities to further clarify and develop evidenced-based neutropenia standards of practice. 123 Staff nurses on a 26 bed, inpatient hematology-oncology unit in a tertiary care community teaching hospital questioned whether their patients were achieving adequate control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Their initial belief, based on clinical observations of patients, was that symptom management could be improved with optimized use of pharmacologic interventions. Despite having evidenced-based chemotherapy administration clinical practice guidelines that include pre-, concomitant-, and post-chemotherapy antiemetics, some patients receiving chemotherapy suffered nausea and vomiting. The first step in the performance improvement (PI) process was to confirm the nurses’ beliefs with the patients’ perceptions. Following completion of their chemotherapy regimen, patients were asked by a professional nurse to state “yes” or “no” to the question, “Did you feel satisfied with the way your nausea was controlled during your hospital stay?” The study confirmed that opportunities for improvement existed related to nausea control. Working in collaboration with our nurse researcher and unit-based pharmacist, retrospective medical record data was collected for each patient who had been surveyed. We investigated whether the patients had antiemetics ordered and administered according to the clinical practice guidelines. We found that the majority of patients who were not satisfied with the way their nausea was controlled did not have antiemetics ordered and/or administered in accordance with the clinical practice guidelines. For example, antiemetics were not consistently ordered according to the clinical practice guidelines and antiemetics ordered “prn” were not always administered in a timely manner. In conjunction with the aforementioned investigation, we completed an evidence table utilizing related literature from the past three years. The evidence revealed that antiemetic orders included within our clinical practice guidelines are consistent with the most recent research; however, we did we include a full range of complementary antiemetic therapies within our chemotherapy nausea and vomiting prevention standard. This presentation will describe these first steps in our PI initiative, as well as relate the action plans implemented to address the aforementioned opportunities for improvement. Participants will receive copies of our evidence table and evidenced-based chemotherapy administration clinical practice guidelines and associated nursing standards of care, including complementary therapies. 124 Background and Rationale: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)
use in the oncology population has recently increased from 30% to 85%.
A 2001 study reported that 65% of oncology patients do not disclose CAM
use to the tealthcare team. CAM therapies may have harmful effects for
patients when used with radiation or chemotherapy, and many nurses are
not prepared to assess CAM use or adverse reactions. CAM information,
however, is readily available. Analysis of published CAM information revealed
52 articles in 20 journals over 6 years. In addition, 43 published studies
included 18 articles in ONF or Cancer Nursing. 125 Complimentary therapies are used by a number of cancer patients to either manage symptoms or supplement treatment. A survey at University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in 1999 showed that 70% of patients had tried complimentary therapies. These therapies are readily available, often reasonably priced, and can be self managed. Recent surveys have indicated that aromatherapy is growing in popularity in acute and long term care settings. However, there is little reported research with aromatherapy in these settings. In fact, a review of the literature indicates a lack of knowledge in terms of dosing, methods of administration, and therapeutic outcomes. Although many people who use aromatherapy are not formally certified, it is important that they have a level of knowledge regarding essential oils, their potential side effects, and dosing. There are licensed caregivers, such as massage therapists or estheticians who regularly utilize aromatherapy within their practice. These practitioners have received an introduction to the use of essential oils and are not excluded from using them, although they may not have received formal certification. There is an increasing interest in aromatherapy by nursing caregivers, especially related to symptom management for cancer therapy. However, most nurses have not received specific education in the use of essential oils, selection of oils, contraindication, or interactions. Despite this lack of knowledge, aromatherapy is increasingly included as a part of holistic nursing care and has been recognized as such by one state board of nursing. It is important to realize that recognition or interest does not negate the need for some type of formal training for preparation and use. This presentation will provide an overview of aromatherapy, qualifications necessary for practice, and information related to the safety and toxicity of the commonly used essential oils. It will also include information regarding the best approaches for safe administration. Finally, it will include an overview of the research that has been completed in acute and long-term care settings. Although these studies are relatively few in number and most include small samples, there is some support showing the value of aromatherapy in patient care. 126 The spiritual quest of an individual is a very personal one, in particular those struggling with a serious illness such as cancer, as they frequently turn to spiritual values to help them cope with or understand their illness. Research and patients’ and family writings, stories, and support groups have validated this basic tenet. Therefore, a spirituality quest group was implemented within our community hospital’s cancer program. From an initial one-evening spiritual class offered to cancer survivors ten years ago to the successful development of a monthly spiritual group, five years occurred. Groundwork consisted of collaboration with the chaplaincy services department of our hospital and the initial co-facilitators’ participation in a parish nursing program. We were also influenced by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, which recommends that hospitals provide pastoral care and spiritual services for patients since, for many, it is an “integral part of health care and daily life.” When the actual spirituality group met for its first session, much discussion naturally centered on “what is spirituality?” and what name the group would be called. After many creative names, the fundamental “Spirituality Quest” was chosen, as it reflected the connection between the questioning and the experiencing of one’s beliefs. The group’s quest for spirituality has been more closely linked to their hopefulness and their connection with each other, even though guest speakers have addressed various kinds of spirituality, for example, Salesian, Tibetan, Native American, as well as ways of touching the soul through our senses with music, art, sound, and nature. This presentation will review the literature on the role of spirituality in health and cancer care, the multi-disciplined approach of establishing a spirituality group within a cancer center, the variety of themes covered in the group, the meaning of spirituality shared, and the impact on participants’ quality of life. It is hoped that our experience will encourage oncology nurses to tap into the resources that may already exist within their own healthcare facilities or to create a program that will address the holistic approach, including spirituality, to oncology patient centered care. 127 A complementary therapy program in oncology was launched by two hospitals
in the Cape Cod HealthCare (CCHC) system in 2001. Two pilot studies using
complementary therapies with chemotherapy outpatients were conducted to
evaluate patient benefit. The program has grown to include three locations,
including radiation therapy. Two nurses, trained in complementary therapies,
provide these services. 128 The stresses inherent in oncology nursing are well documented. Add to them, concerns about the nursing shortage, economic downturns, and fast-paced home lives, and you have a situation ripe for oncology nurse burn out and attrition. In our multi-site regional cancer center, our goal was to create an environment that maximizes support and growth, with the belief that such an environment will foster a workplace where care and caring happens for patients, families, and colleagues. To accomplish this goal, two interactive small group sessions were designed, focusing on mentoring. Each set of 2 sessions was limited to eight participants. Sessions were scheduled throughout the summer. Mentoring was defined as “A developmental, empowering, and nurturing relationship that extends over time. It involves mutual sharing, learning, and growth that occurs in an atmosphere of respect and affirmation” (Haley-Andrews). This definition is different than the paired “precepting” that is so often described in the literature. First, ground rules were established, emphasizing the need for confidentiality and safety in disclosure. Participants identified and discussed key characteristics of a mentor, and were led, using guided-imagery, through a journey with the mentors in their lives. Then, storytelling was introduced as a means for making visible our work as oncology nurses, connecting with patients and families during some of the most vulnerable times of their lives. The facilitator told a professional story of mentoring to model the process and to create a desire for group members to explore their own stories. Once the stage was set, each one wrote a story of a significant personal or professional mentoring event in their life. During the second session, each person told her story, reflecting on its personal meaning. Group members were asked to respond to each story, describing its meaning and impact for them. On conclusion, they wrote brief evaluative thoughts about the experience. Though just a beginning, the impact of the shared experiences in the stories is clear. The 36 oncology nurses attending have a renewed commitment to each other and to the work that they do every day. 129 Until recently, the concept of a physically fit cancer survivor was seen
as an oxymoron. Today, cancer survivors want to incorporate fitness into
their treatment regimen to combat fatigue, aid in the healing process,
and counteract the negative effects of cancer treatments. 130 Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has advanced to the forefront of western medicine in the 21st century in the U.S. Either as treatment for medical conditions or symptomatic relief, CAM is sought by itself or in addition to conventional medicine. While percentages of cancer patients who use CAM remain variable, APNs are compelled to become well informed regarding CAM practices. The acronym C-A-M is suggested as an approach that oncology nurses can reliably use when advocating CAM and cancer care. “C” represents clarifying fact from fiction. “A” represents acknowledging our perceptions. “M” represents mixing and Un-mixing medicines. Clarifying fact from fiction. Mainstream oncologists and CAM practitioners struggle with a comprehensive definition of CAM. Complementary medicine in cancer care includes interventions that augment surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation or for symptom management. Alternative medicine in cancer care includes interventions independent of standard treatment. The known facts about CAM may be accurate in certain circumstances. The fiction may be that results are universal for all individuals. Inconsistencies with quality control, scientific design, and confounding variables undermine “facts.” APNs need to become experts in recognizing reputable CAM research data and promoting sound research design. Acknowledging our perceptions. Popularity of CAM in cancer care is complex. When cancer patients are terminally ill, who would question a patient’s desire to extend life with an alternative approach? But what if that same patient used an alternative approach upfront? Oncology nursing undergraduate and graduate curriculums train nurses to approach the cancer diagnosis with uniform principles and practices of western medicine. Personal and corporate biases need to be acknowledged. A profitable way to accomplish this is through dialogue. Alternately, APNs need to recognize that ridicule is often a mask for ignorance. Non-judgmental responses are optimal. Mixing and un-mixing medicines. The hippocratic oath of “Do no harm” is vital when CAM is paired with conventional cancer therapy. APNs have a responsibility to the practice of oncology and patients. Supportive avenues are: 1) encourage partnering in planning care, 2) promote access to CAM databases, journals, and reputable internet sites, 3) generate surveys to discover reasons for nondisclosure, 4) support licensure of colleagues practicing CAM, 5) develop clinical trials and publish results in peer-reviewed journals, 6) generate scholarly papers examining CAM practice, perceptions, and opportunities to build bridges in CAM and cancer care. 131 Cancer and its ensuing treatment often compromise the well-being and
quality of life (QOL) for those with a current or past diagnosis of cancer.
Recent studies and anecdotal evidence have shown that exercise, as part
of an integrated cancer care program, can improve mood (Segar, M.L., Katch,
V.L., & Roth, R.S., (1998). Oncology Nursing Forum, 25(1), 107–113),
enhance immunity (Shephard, R.J., & Shek, P.N. (1995). Can J Appl
Physiol, 20(1), 1–25), reduce symptoms (Courneya, K.S., & Friedenreich,
C.M. (1999). Ann Behav Med, 21(2), 171–179), increase longevity
and decrease risk of cancer (Rockhill, B., et al. (1999). Arch Intern
Med, 159(19), 2290–2296). 132 Families and friends bring important support to their loved one’s
healthcare experience. Encouraging a caring individual’s presence
helps reassure, comfort, and heal a patient. For our 41-bed inpatient
oncology unit at Park Nicollet Health Services, we wanted to formally
offer families the opportunity to be directly involved in their loved
one’s care. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation have long been standard treatments
for cancer. In addition to these therapies that focus on disease, there
exists a healing tradition, which emphasizes not only the disease, but
also the individual. These two approaches should not be seen as mutually
exclusive, but as complementary to each other. With the understanding
that many patients are already seeking complementary therapies before,
during, and after cancer treatment, a healing arts program was developed.
The primary goal of the program is to augment state-of-the-art clinical
care with a healing arts program that supports cancer patients along their
journey. The programs address the person as a whole, including body, mind,
and spirit. Included are programs on spirituality, patient education,
art, massage, Reiki, music therapy, meditation, humor, exercise, journaling,
and nutrition. Significance & Problem: Breast cancer was the leading cancer for
American women in 2000. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has been recognized
as a distressing side effect of cancer treatment. Studies have shown that
adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC), a frequent chemotherapy regimen
for breast cancer, is associated with higher fatigue levels 48 to 72 hours
post administration. Exercise is one of the few interventions suggested
to alleviate CRF. The present investigators observed a dramatic day-to-day
fluctuation in fatigue. Although two studies have reported daily fatigue
levels, our analyses of fatigue scores further extend our knowledge in
the area. 135 Problem/Purpose: Fatigue has frequently been implicated as a distressing
effect of lung cancer and its treatment that negatively affects quality
of life (QOL). Studies have shown that walking programs reduce fatigue
and improve general well-being in women with breast cancer; however, there
are no studies of the effects of modified exercise programs on QOL in
lung cancer patients, whose participation in a walking program might be
limited due to climate, safety, and/or scheduling concerns. The purpose
of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of a major research
study to determine the effects of a seated exercise program on QOL and
fatigue in lung cancer patients and to explore strategies used by lung
cancer patients to maintain or promote QOL. 136 Recent work suggests that the presence of one or more symptoms (specifically pain, fatigue, or sleep disturbance) can influence outcomes in oncology outpatients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of symptoms an oncology outpatient reported affects fatigue severity. Oncology outpatients (n = 117) who were receiving active treatment for their disease were recruited from four sites. The majority of the patients were female (75.2%) and Caucasian (86.2%) with a mean age of 59.6 years. The patients completed a demographic questionnaire, a numeric rating scale for worst pain, the Lee Fatigue Scale (LFS), the General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), and the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D). Patients were classified into one of four symptom groupings (i.e., 0, 1, 2, or 3 symptoms) based on pre-established cutoffs for pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. A linear stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to determine which of the following ten variables were significant, independent predictors of fatigue: age, gender, years of education, living arrangements, hematocrit, Karnofsky Performance Status score, CES-D score, quality of sleep score, excessive daytime sleepiness score, and total number of symptoms. The optimal regression equation included only four of these ten variables and explained 56.7% of the total variance in fatigue (F {4, 92} = 30.06, p = 0.000). The significant, unique contributions of these four variables were: 7.84% for number of symptoms (p = 0.000), 7.45% for excessive daytime sleepiness (p = 0.000), 5.06% for depression (p = 0.001), and 2.79% for quality of sleep (p = 0.017). These findings suggest that increased levels of fatigue occur in patients who are experiencing multiple symptoms, are depressed, have poorer sleep quality, and report excessive daytime sleepiness. 137 The purpose of this study was to identify independent predictors of clinically significant fatigue (usual fatigue = > 3/10) and analgesic related CNS toxicity (hallucinations and sedation) 1 week after intensive opioid management. The study is based on a multidimensional biopsychosocial framework. One hundred and thirty eight (138) patients with worst cancer pain severity = > 4/10 completed the Brief Pain Inventory, Brief Fatigue Inventory, and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form at baseline and week 1. Patients reporting hallucinations, confusion, sedation, and myoclonus were assessed at both time points. The median age was 67 years (43–86). At day 1, median KPS was 60 (40–80), hemoglobin 11.8 mg/dL (6.8–16), usual fatigue severity 5 (0–10), and worst pain severity 9 (4–10) with morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) 20 mg (0–3, 120). At week 1, there was a significant improvement in KPS (median 70 {20–90}, p < 0.0001), and in worst pain severity (6 {0–10}, p < 0.0001). The MEDD was 90 mg (0–3, 120), and the percentage of patients on opioids increased from 65% to 96%. CNS toxicity included greater sedation in 49 patients (28%), difficulty concentrating in 25 patients (19%), confusion in 28 patients (18%), myoclonus in 25 patients (17%), and hallucinations 18 patients (13.6%). However, only hallucinations (7% versus 18%, p = 0.007) and sedation (34% versus 54%, p = 0.001) showed a significantly higher incidence at week 1. Patients with hallucinations (RR = 0.44, p = 0.004) and sedation (RR = 0.67, p = 0.02) were at increased risk for poor pain outcome at week 1. By multidimensional multivariate logistic analysis, the presence of feeling confused, hemoglobin level, preexisting hallucinations, and difficulty sleeping (p < 0.0001 & = 0.02, 0.03, 0.02, respectively) predicted hallucinations independently. Feeling drowsy, preexisting sedation, older age, and KPS (p = 0.001, 0.007, 0.005, 0.03, respectively) predicted sedation independently. Clinically significant fatigue was present in 71% of patients; feeling drowsy, feeling nervous, sedation, and difficulty concentrating (p < 0.0001 & = 0.03, 0.05, 0.05, respectively) predicted clinically significant fatigue independently. Most patients required further fatigue management. MEDD did not predict hallucinations, sedation, or fatigue in univariate analyses. In conclusion, patients with preexisting CNS symptoms, difficulty sleeping, older age, lower hemoglobin, and poor KPS are at increased risk for developing hallucinations and sedation after intensive cancer pain management. 138 The purpose of this secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to identify characteristics that predict benefit from an energy conservation/activity management (ECAM) intervention for cancer-related fatigue. The Common Sense Model provided the conceptual basis for the RCT. Valid and reliable measures were used to evaluate fatigue at baseline and two follow-up points of expected high fatigue. The RCT demonstrated that teaching energy conservation (delegation, priority setting, pacing oneself, and planning activities at times of peak energy) benefited a diverse sample of 396 men and women. The ECAM group reported less fatigue, distress, and impact than a comparison group. Given the positive result, it is essential to identify patient characteristics that will enable busy clinicians to target individuals most likely to benefit from this intervention. The secondary analysis included 111 participants in the ECAM group who completed measures at all three data points. Multiple regression with residual analysis was used to create a dichotomous variable indicating high or low change in fatigue scores. Change scores indicated greater or less benefit from the ECAM intervention. Chi-square and t-tests were used to evaluate demographic (age, education, marital, or work status), clinical (diagnosis, disease stage, performance status, treatment type, or side effects), and behavioral characteristics (baseline function in usual activities, sleep disturbance, and mood disturbance) as candidate predictors of benefit from the intervention. Only cancer treatment group (p = .001) and functional performance of household duties (.01) distinguished the groups with greater or less benefit from the intervention. More than two thirds of those in the high benefit group (71%) had been treated with RT compared with 29% of those receiving CTX/concurrent therapy. Persons in the high benefit group had significantly better baseline performance of household activities than the low benefit group. The findings indicate that persons receiving less intensive therapy, such as RT, and those who start out with higher baseline functioning are most likely to benefit from the ECAM intervention. The results suggest that persons treated with intensive therapy or whose usual functioning is compromised at the start of therapy may require more intensive or more comprehensive symptom management. 139 Significance: While significant literature supports the occurrence and
distress of cancer treatment-related fatigue and fatigue in advanced cancer,
little evidence is available on the newly diagnosed cancer patient. 140 Significance: The number of women undergoing adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy
continues to increase due to the aging of baby boomers and use of more
aggressive first-line therapies. Previous descriptive research has found
that symptoms, physical functioning, psychological status, activity/rest,
and sleep/wake patterns are associated with fatigue in women during and
after treatments. 141 Patients can experience a multitude of symptoms related to their cancer
and cancer treatment. Pain, nausea, and vomiting have been the focus of
considerable research over the years. Providing evidence-based clinical
interventions has improved patient care and successful management of these
side effects is a hallmark of cancer nursing. In recent years, fatigue
has been recognized as a prevalent and often debilitating symptom for
cancer patients. Despite the increased recognition of cancer-related fatigue
(CRF), it is often not assessed in the clinical setting. Clinicians do
not always recognize fatigue as a critical symptom and perceive a lack
of effective therapy. Assessment of fatigue is also difficult because
it is complex and multi-dimensional. Significance: As more women receive adjuvant chemotherapy for breast
cancer, there is a growing recognition of the potential long-term side
effects such as increased fatigue, decreased stamina, and loss of energy
that impact quality of life (QOL). 143 Many family caregivers are actively involved in managing their relative’s cancer pain; however little is known about their pain management experiences and their impact on caregivers and patients. Based on the PRECEDE model of health behavior, the purpose of this study was to identify factors which may influence family caregivers’ experiences with cancer pain management. A consecutively recruited cohort of 75 family members attending outpatient oncology clinics with a relative who had experienced cancer pain in the past month completed a self-administered survey. The sample had a mean age of 55 years (SD = 13.5), with 75% being female. 68% of the sample rated their family member’s average pain in the past week as 5 or higher on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The survey comprised measures of: 1) demographics/medical characteristics, 2) pain knowledge, 3) concerns about addiction, side effects, progression, tolerance, 4) perceived difficulty communicating regarding pain, and 5) pain management actions. On a scale from 0 = none to 10 = a great deal, family caregiver’s mean knowledge score was 5.5 (SD = 2.5), while their mean preparedness and confidence scores were 7.8 (SD = 2.5) and 6.8 (SD = 2.9), respectively. All family caregivers (100%) stated they wanted t |