Aquaphor is an over-the-counter ointment that has been used, with infants in particular, as a barrier to maintain skin moisture and protect against irritants. Aquaphor has been studied for its effectiveness in the prevention and management of radiodermatitis.
Effectiveness Not Established
Research Evidence Summaries
Gosselin, T.K., Schneider, S.M., Plambeck, M.A., & Rowe, K. (2010). A prospective randomized, placebo-controlled skin care study in women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(5), 619–626.doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.619-626
To compare the effectiveness of three different products in reducing incidence of radiodermatitis
Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process:
Women were randomly assigned to placebo (sterile water mist), Aquaphor, Biafine or RadiaCare gel. Patients were instructed to apply the product two times daily with the start of radiotherapy and until treatment was complete. Patients were not to use any other skin care product on the affected area. The radiation nurse assessed patients weekly and reminded them to complete home journals. The investigators conducted independent skin assessments on a random sample of 10% of patients to establish reliability of observations.
- The study sample was comprised of 208 female patients.
- Mean age ranged from 54–56 years.
- All patients had stage 1 or 2 breast cancer.
- Median dose was 200 cGy daily with a total dose of 6200 cGy most often.
- The average number of treatments was 31.
The study took place in an outpatient setting at Duke University.
Phase of Care and Clinical Applications:
Patients were undergoing active antitumor treatment.
The study used a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized four-group trial design.
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group skin toxicity scoring was used.
- Patients kept a journal of application, satisfaction, and ease of use.
Ninety-five percent of patients had a skin reaction, with most occurring by week 4. None of the products tested showed a significant difference to reduce the incidence of grade 2–4 skin toxicity compared to placebo. Increases in the proportion with a skin reaction were greatest among those using Biafine. Increases in skin reaction were similar to each other in the other study groups. Patient adherence to use was greater than 80% during the study. Biafine was associated with the greatest increase in toxicity across groups.
None of the products tested here were better than placebo in reducing incidence of grade 2–4 radiodermatitis.
Findings suggest that none of these particular products are effective, although a systematic review and meta-analysis in this area suggest that using anything is more effective than using nothing. Further well-designed research in prevention and management of radiodermatitis is needed.