Ginseng

Ginseng

PEP Topic 
Fatigue
Description 

The name ginseng applies to various herbs that have been used medicinally for many centuries. Asian ginseng (Panax ginseng) is one of several types of true ginseng; another is American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). American ginseng is used for stress, to boost the immune system, and as a general tonic and stimulant. American ginseng contains chemicals called ginsenosides that seem to affect insulin levels in the body and lower blood sugar. Other chemicals in ginseng, polysaccharides, might affect the immune system.

Ginseng has been examined for use in fatigue, and is considered as part of complementary and alternative medicine interventions in cognitive impairment. Not all types of ginseng have the same chemical contents, and so, not necessarily the same effectiveness.

Likely to Be Effective

Research Evidence Summaries

Barton, D.L., Liu, H., Dakhil, S.R., Linquist, B., Sloan, J.A., Nichols, C.R., . . . Loprinzi, C.L. (2013). Wisconsin ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) to improve cancer-related fatigue: A randomized, double-blind trial, N07C2. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 1230–1238. 

doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt181
Print

Study Purpose:

To evaluate the efficacy of Wisconsin ginseng on cancer-related fatigue (CRF).

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process:

2,000 mg of Wisconsin ginseng or placebo BID (breakfast and lunch) over eight weeks. The assessment conducted at baseline and at four and eight weeks.

Sample Characteristics:

  • N = 364
  • MEAN AGE = 55.3 years for the ginseng group, 55.9 for the placebo group
  • MALES: 19% in ginseng group and 25% in placebo group, FEMALES: 81% in ginseng group and 75% in placebo group         
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Primarily breast (64% in ginseng and 57% in placebo groups) but included colon, prostate, hematologic, gynecologic, and combination/unknown/other cancers having completed or receiving curative intent therapy within past two years and who scored a minimum of 4 on 11-point scale that was present at least a month prior to study entry.
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Some were on active treatment during the study and some were post-cancer treatment.

Setting:

  • SITE: Multi-site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Not specified  
  • LOCATION: Mostly community cancer centers; location not specified

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications:

  • PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care

Study Design:

  • Randomized, double-blind trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods:

  • Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory–Short Form (general subscale)
  • Profile of Mood States (fatigue-inertia and vigor-activity subscales)
  • Brief Fatigue Inventory
  • CTCAE (version not specified)

Results:

Statistically significant changes in scores for MFSI-SF between ginseng and placebo groups at four and eight weeks was in favor of ginseng, but only among those in active treatment. No differences in BFI scores were noted. Greater benefit reported among patients receiving active cancer treatment versus those who had completed treatment.

Conclusions:

The ginseng group had improvements in fatigue scores over four- and eight-week periods without significant toxicities. However, data lacking on selected drug-ginseng interactions.

Limitations:

  • Selective outcomes reporting
  • Subject withdrawals ≥ 10%

Nursing Implications:

Supports use of (controlled, manufactured) Wisconsin ginseng to modify CRF; however, more research is needed to determine how to maximize positive effects. It appears that ginseng effects may only be seen during active treatment.

Barton, D. L., Soori, G. S., Bauer, B. A., Sloan, J. A., Johnson, P. A., Figueras, C., . . . Loprinzi, C. L. (2010). Pilot study of Panax quinquefolius (American ginseng) to improve cancer-related fatigue: a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding evaluation: NCCTG trial N03CA. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18, 179–187.

doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0642-2
Print

Study Purpose:

To determine whether any of three specific doses of American ginseng help cancer-related fatigue, as well as to evaluate toxicity.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process:

Patients were randomized to receive ginseng doses of 750, 1,000, or 2,000 mg per day or placebo. Doses were given in twice daily dosing over eight weeks. The ginseng used was Wisconsin ginseng that met quality-control requirements for pesticides and contaminants. Specific description of ginsenosides content is described. 

Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. Patients were stratified according to stage of disease, gender, baseline fatigue score, and current treatment. Randomization assignments were computer-generated using a dynamic allocation procedure for distribution of stratification factors.

Sample Characteristics:

  • In total, 175 patients (66% female) with a history of chronic fatigue completed the study. 
  • Mean age across study groups ranged from 58 to 62 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12).
  • Patient diagnoses were predominantly breast, colon, and lung cancer.
  • Of the patients, 62% had stage III/IV disease.
  • Of the patients, 71% had a baseline fatigue score of 4 to 7.
  • Of the patients, 65% had previous chemotherapy.
  • Of the patients, 57% were receiving current chemotherapy and 18% were receiving current radiotherapy.
  • No significant differences existed between groups in demographic, disease, or treatment characteristics.

 

Setting:

This was a multisite collaborative trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment group and the Mayo Clinic.

Study Design:

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Measurement Instruments/Methods:

  • Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
  • Vitality subscale of the Medical Outcome Scale (MOS) Short Form (SF-36)
  • Global Impression of Benefit Scale
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
  • Global Impression of Change
  • Linear Analogue Scale
  • Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE)
  • Patients completed weekly self reports of toxicities in a symptom experience diary to rate side effects on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

Results:

  • Mean scores for the SF-36 subscale between collective ginseng arms and placebo were not significantly different. A trend was observed for greater positive effects at the highest ginseng dose.
  • Analysis of change in fatigue showed a greater effect on fatigue with the highest two dose groups, but this was not statistically significant.
  • A trend was observed for greatest effect on quality of life measures at the highest ginseng doses.
  • The greatest PSQI improvement over time occurred in the placebo group.
  • Patient subjective perception of benefits showed an overall trend of higher benefit in the two highest ginseng dosage groups.
  • No significant toxicities were associated with the use of ginseng.

Conclusions:

Findings suggest that ginseng at the dose of 750 mg per day did not provide any benefit over that of placebo. At the two highest doses of ginseng, a trend was observed of decreased fatigue compared to placebo.

Limitations:

  • The study was powered as a pilot study to evaluate composite ginseng dose groups versus placebo, so dose-related findings were underpowered to show statistical significance. 
  • A challenge in studying herbal supplements is the lack of standardization and variability in content affected by growing conditions, so the findings may not be generalizable to use of ginseng grown elsewhere or under different climactic conditions.

Nursing Implications:

The preliminary evidence here suggests that the improvement in patient perception with ginseng versus placebo is that this effect may have broad benefit to patients, even if objective measures of outcomes are nonsignificant. It would be worthwhile to more clearly and definitively evaluate the benefits of ginseng in additional larger, more definitive clinical trials.


Menu