de Castro, J.F., Abreu, E.G., Correia, A.V., Brasil, C.D., da Cruz Perez, D.E., & Pedrosa, F.D. (2013). Low-level laser in prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 31, 613–618.   

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To evaluate the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were distributed by convenience sampling into two groups (A and B) based on the order in which they were hospitalized. Group A was composed of patients who received preventive laser (red or infrared subgroups A1 [n = 10] and A2 [n = 10], respectively) for five days, beginning on the first day of chemotherapy. Group B was composed of patients who did not receive any preventive intervention, and those who developed post-chemotherapy mucositis were subjected to therapeutic laser (red or infrared subgroups B1 [n = 10] and B2 [n = 10]) until full remission of the lesions.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 40  
  • AGE = 1–18 years
  • MALES: 67.5 %, FEMALES: 32.5%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Pediatric population with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received high-dose methotrexate

Setting

  • SITE: Single site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Inpatient   
  • LOCATION: Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernano Figueira

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
  • APPLICATIONS: Pediatrics

Study Design

The patients were distributed by convenience sampling into two groups (A and B) based on the order in which they were hospitalized. Group A received preventive laser, and Group B received therapeutic laser.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Evaluations were done by daily use of the World Health Organization (WHO) scale grade 0–IV, and patient self-assessed pain was measured by means of the visual analog scale (VAS) (0–10). This assessment was made before each LLLT session.

Results

The overall incidence of OM was 57.5% up to the age of 8 years; the degree of mucositis was significantly higher than that observed among patients older than 8 years. Generally in group A, 40% of patients developed OM, and in Group B, 75% of patients developed OM. In subgroup A1, 30% had mucositis, and in subgroup A2, 50% had mucositis. In subgroup B1, 70% had mucositis, and in subgroup B2, 80% had mucositis. In both groups, 75% did not develop pain symptoms. The Mann-Whitney test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the type of laser with the number of days with pain and severity of mucositis.

Conclusions

This study validates that there are positive results with the use of LLLT in reducing the incidence and severity of OM in patients undergoing anticancer treatment. The study confirmed that there is a reduction in the average duration of OM that occurred in both groups.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Findings not generalizable
  • Intervention expensive, impractical, or training needs

Nursing Implications

Among the pediatric population receiving consolidation chemotherapy with methoexate, the study showed that prophylactic laser (with red laser 660nm) produced a better outcome than when patients did not receive any preventive intervention for OM. For nursing, this is another option to help reduce the severity and duration of OM. It is likely that nurses would need to work in a multidisciplinary setting to provide the patient population with this intervention. The study does not provide information about the professional who is trained and able to provide the LLLT.