Acupressure is a therapeutic technique of applying digital pressure (pressure applied by the digits or hands) in a specific way on designated points on the body. By applying pressure to one or more acupoints, practitioners correct imbalances by stimulating or easing energy flow. The acupoint most commonly investigated and accessible is P6, which is located on the anterior surface of the forearm, approximately three finger-widths from the wrist crease. Acupressure devices also have been developed; these are considered passive forms of pressure and differ from digital pressure. The Sea-Band® device is an example of a commercially available acupressure device that is a plastic stud incorporated into a wrist band to exert pressure on the P6 acupuncture point. The H7 acupressure point at the wrist has been used to treat insomnia. Acupressure has been examined for its effect on anxiety, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, depression, fatigue, pain, and sleep/wake disturbances.
Chao, L.F., Zhang, A.L., Liu, H.E., Cheng, M.H., Lam, H.B., & Lo, S.K. (2009). The efficacy of acupoint stimulation for the management of therapy-related adverse events in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 118, 255–267.
To scrutinize the evidence of using acupoint stimulation (APS) by any modality on managing adverse events related to anticancer therapies in patients with breast cancer
English databases searched were PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and PsycINFO.
Chinese databases searched were CNKI, CEPS, and WanFang as well as manual searching.
Search keywords were medical terms of breast cancer (e.g., breast neoplasm, breast carcinoma, breast tumor) combined separately with at least one of the following: acupuncture, acupressure, auricular acupuncture, ear acupuncture, acupuncture points, electroacupuncture, acupoint, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, moxibustion.
Studies were included if they
Studies were excluded if they were
Initial review involved 843 titles and abstracts and 51 full-text articles. Of those, 26 studies were included in the report.
Study evaluation began with two independent reviewers using a modified Jadad scale, assessing 3 aspects: randomization procedure (2 points); dropout and withdrawal discussion (1 point); and blinding (2 points). Studies were classified as high quality if they attained a score of 3 or higher.
Evaluated literature included 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight controlled clinical trials published between 1999 and 2008. Nine trials included conventional acupuncture, 6 included electroacupuncture, 5 included drug injection in acupoints, 3 included self-acupressure, and 3 included acupoint stimulation by wristbands or acumagnet. Eighteen were in English, and 8 were in Chinese.
Nine of the 26 studies were rated as high quality. Adverse effects (outcomes) of the APS included vasomotor syndrome, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), post-mastectomy pain, joint symptoms, lymphedema, leukopenia, and adverse events.
Eleven studies investigated CINV and APS with acupoints P6 and ST36. Ten of the CINV studies reported APS significantly improved emesis caused by breast cancer therapy.
The most common outcome evaluated by APS in the studies was CINV. APS was noted to be effective in reducing acute emesis caused by breast cancer therapy. Authors reported that APS is beneficial in the management of CINV, especially in the acute phase.
Healthcare providers should consider using APS as an option for the management of CINV.
Collins, K.B., & Thomas, D.J. (2004). Acupuncture and acupressure for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 16(2), 80-84.
To review existing research on the use of acupuncture and acupressure in the management of nausea and vomiting in order to provide nurses the information required to assist their patients receiving chemotherapy and experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Databases searched were described as scientific and internet sources, Institutes of Health Consensus statement, and federal regulations.
Search keywords included acupuncture and acupressure in combination with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Numerous studies tested the effectiveness of acupressure, acupuncture, and the combination. Few focused on acupressure alone for managing CINV.
A total of five studies were found, representing a total of 409 patients.
Very few studies were found, but, overall, results indicated improvement in nausea and vomiting, supporting the use of acupressure and acupuncture of the treatment of CINV. Acupuncture and acupressure were found to be safe and effective for the relief of CINV in combination with current antiemetic drugs.
The sample sizes were small in the studies; therefore, determining applicability to various practice settings and populations is difficult.
Ezzo, J., Vickers, A., Richardson, M.A., Allen, C., Dibble, S.L., Issell, B., … Zhang, G. (2005). Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 7188-7198.
Database searched was MEDLINE (1966-Dec 2003).
Search keywords were acupuncture, alternative medicine, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, “injections, intramuscular”, “Medicine, Traditional Chinese”, acupressure, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and TENS. These were combined with nausea, vomiting, emesis, antiemetic therapy, and antineoplastic agents/adverse effects.
Studies were included in the review if they
Studies were excluded from the review if they had a high possibility of bias.
In all, 14 studies were identified and reviewed.
In the nine studies that evaluated acute vomiting management via acupuncture-point stimulation, acute vomiting was reduced but nausea severity was not.
In the seven studies that assessed acute nausea via acupressure, acute nausea severity was reduced.
Three studies that evaluated delayed vomiting did not support the intervention.
In the five studies using acupuncture-point stimulation, the intervention did not reduce delayed vomiting.
The pooled results of 11 studies using acupuncture-point stimulation plus antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) showed significant reduction in acute vomiting and marginal statistical significance for reducing acute nausea.
Electroacupuncture provided protective effects for acute vomiting, but acupuncture did not. Acupressure was effective for acute nausea in patients using “state-of-the-art” antiemetics. However, placebo effects may have influenced results.
Klein, J., & Griffiths, P. (2004). Acupressure for nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. British Journal of Community Nursing, 9, 383-387.
Databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, the Cochrane Database, Cancerlit, and CINAHL.
Search keywords were adult patients receiving chemotherapy, with nausea and vomiting duration or intensity measured as outcomes.
Two randomized controlled trials were identified involving 482 patients. The studies compared acupressure to no intervention control. However, the second study did not meet inclusion criteria, as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of antiemetic point was used.
Results suggested that acupressure may decrease nausea in patients receiving chemotherapy, but further work is required before conclusively advising patients on the efficacy of acupressure in preventing and treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Miao, J., Liu, X., Wu, C., Kong, H., Xie, W., & Liu, K. (2017). Effects of acupressure on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting-a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 70, 27–37.
STUDY PURPOSE: Assess effectiveness of acupressure on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Active anti-tumor treatment
Relative risk for incidence of acute vomiting across five trials was 0.84 in favor of acupressure, but this was not significant (p = 0.08). There was not a significant difference in relative risk with or without acupressure (p = 0.29) (two trials). Acupressure combined with antiemetics decreased nausea severity in the delayed phase (SMD = -0.33, p = 0.04), but there was no significant effect on incidence and frequency of delayed vomiting. P6 was the most frequently used acupoint. Interventions used either a wristband or manual acupressure, and findings for these two approaches differed. Sham control trials did not demonstrate a significant effect.
Acupressure may reduce the severity of nausea, particularly in the delayed phase in patients receiving MEC or HEC
Acupressure might be a useful adjunct to antiemetics for management of CINV. Findings suggest that this may be helpful to reduce the severity of nausea, which has remained a problem even with maximum antiemetics. Findings of this analysis showed differences with sham controlled trials, suggesting there may be a placebo effect of acupressure.
Miller, M., & Kearney, N. (2004). Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting—Past reflections, present practice and future management. European Journal of Cancer Care, 13(1), 71-81.
Support for the use of nonpharmacologic interventions for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) was weak.
Many studies were flawed because of small sample sizes and confounding variables (e.g., stage of disease, various chemotherapy regimens, culture, patient compliance).
Preliminary available evidence suggests positive benefits through nonpharmacologic techniques; however, larger randomized trials are needed to demonstrate the exact benefits, including economic.
Silva, D.R.F., dos Reis, P.E.D., Gomes, I.P., Funghetto, S.S., & Ponce de Leon, C.G.R.M. (2009). Non pharmacological interventions for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomits: Integrative review. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 8(1).
To identify the evidence in scientific literature related to nonpharmacologic interventions for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Databases searched were Cochrane, PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACSO), and Brazilian Nursing Database (BDENF).
Search keywords were nausea, vomiting, chemotherapy, nursing care, cursing care protocols for cancer chemotherapy, and chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting.
Studies were included in the review if they
This review demonstrated no substantial effects among the interventions included. Findings regarding the use of acupuncture, acupressure, and electroacupuncture were mixed. Most studies using acupuncture and acupressure involved use of the p6 point on the wrist.
This review included a limited number of studies.
The evidence does not demonstrate significant effect of these interventions for CINV. However, these interventions may be useful as adjuncts to pharmacologic treatment. Nonpharmacologic interventions appear to be most effective in the prevention of acute vomiting rather than symptoms of nausea.
Anusree, A., Sanatomb, D.E., & Latha, T. (2015). Effectiveness of acupressure on chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting and the functional status among cancer patients receiving cisplatin as radiosensitizer chemotherapy in Kasturba Hospital Manipal. International Journal of Nursing Education, 7, 32–36.
To investigate the effectiveness of acupressure in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and to analyze the correlation between CINV and functional status
The study began on the second day of chemotherapy. Patients were assigned to experimental and control groups that matched patients on gender and type of chemotherapy regimen. Acupressure was provided by the researcher by applying firm pressure to selected acupressure points for 3 minutes bilaterally in the morning and evening for three days. Both groups received standard antiemetics. Patients were asked to complete study assessment self-reports daily for CINV. Metoclopramide was given as an antiemetic.
Two-group, prospective, post-test study
Over the three-day period, nausea scores were lower in the experimental group (p = 0.002). There was a weak negative correlation between nausea and functional status (p = 0.03).
Acupressure might be helpful in reducing CINV. Because of reporting and design limitations, this study does not provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of acupressure.
This study provided weak evidence that acupressure may be helpful in the management of CINV.
Avc, H.S., Ovayolu, N., & Ovayolu, O. (2016). Effect of acupressure on nausea-vomiting in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia. Holistic Nursing Practice, 30, 257–262.
To assess the effect of wristband acupressure applied at the P6 (Neiguan) acupuncture point on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML)
Ninety patients with AML receiving the same chemotherapy regimen (high emetogenic chemotherapy, idarubicin and cytarabine) and who received at least the first cycle of chemotherapy were randomized to the control, pressure, or wristband (bilaterally) group for four days. All the patients received the same antiemetics regimen. The researcher applied pressure and instructed patients in the pressure and wristband groups on how to apply pressure on the P6 point (for 15 minutes on each arm) 30 minutes before chemotherapy; patients in the wristband group wore it 30 minutes before chemotherapy and were asked to wear it almost continuously.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Three-arm, randomized, controlled trial
Severity of nausea was less in the wristband group on all study days (p = 0.001) as was severity of vomiting (p < 0.001) and the number of vomiting episodes (p = 0.001). The pressure group had the lowest number of nausea episodes (p = 0.002), and vomiting of that group was lower than in the controls (p = 0.006). Nausea and vomiting declined in all groups over the four study days.
The acupressure band was effective in reducing CINV, and direct pressure application prior to chemotherapy was better than no treatment.
Acupressure (using the wristband) is a complement antiemetic method to control CINV. It is an easy to apply, safe, and cost-efficient, with no side effects. It is also easily taught and learned.
Dibble, S.L., Chapman, J., Mack, K.A., & Shih, A. (2000). Acupressure for nausea: Results of a pilot study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27, 41-47.
To compare the effects of usual care (regular antiemetics) versus usual care plus acupressure training on nausea and its intensity in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer
The intervention involved finger acupressure bilaterally at the P6 and ST36 acupressure points located on the forearm and knee for a maximum of three minutes for each point every morning or as needed for nausea. Baseline and poststudy questionnaires and a daily log were used to collect data.
The study was conducted in two sites located in urban areas in the western United States: an outpatient oncology clinic in a major teaching medical center and a private outpatient oncology practice.
Significant differences existed between the two groups in regard to nausea experience (p < 0.01) and nausea intensity (p < 0.04) during the first 10 days of the chemotherapy cycle, with the acupressure group reporting less intensity and experience of nausea.
Dibble, S.L., Luce, J., Cooper, B.A., Israel, J., Cohen, M., Nussey, B., Rugo, H. (2007). Acupressure for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A randomized clinical trial. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34, 813-820.
To compare the differences in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer among three groups: acupressure, acupressure placebo, and usual care
Subjects were randomized to one of three groups: acupressure to P6 point (active), acupressure to S13 point (placebo), or usual care. Participants in the acupressure groups were taught to apply acupressure wrist devices by research assistants unaware of the active pressure point. All participants completed daily logs for 21 days. Patients measured nausea and vomiting and recorded methods for controlling the symptoms, including antiemetics and acupressure. Research assistants, who had received two hours of training on the study protocol, instructed participants. In an examination or private room, the participants were taught to find a quiet place each morning to perform the acupressure treatment to both P6 points sequentially either as treatment or practice. During the day, participants in the acupressure groups were encouraged to apply digital pressure to one of the points whenever nausea occurred regardless of where they were. Each session was six minutes in the morning and three minutes each during the rest of the day. Self-ratings were completed on a daily basis prior to bedtime. All participants were called or seen on day eight for review of the log and coaching, if needed.
The study was conducted in community oncology programs associated with M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and nine independent sites.
This was a multicenter, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial.
In conjunction with pharmaceutical management, acupressure at P6 was found to reduce the amount and intensity of delayed CINV in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer.
Acupressure is a safe and effective tool to be offered to women undergoing breast cancer chemotherapy treatment.
Eghbali, M., Yekaninejad, M.S., Varaei, S., Jalalinia, S.F., Samimi, M.A., & Sa'atchi, K. (2016). The effect of auricular acupressure on nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy among breast cancer patients. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 24, 189–194.
To determine if the use of auricular acupressure is effective in relieving nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy
Random assignment of patients: The experimental group received standard antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and auricular acupressure (AA) for five days. The control group received standard antiemetics only. Acute and delayed CINV was measured with the Morrow questionnaire daily for five days after receiving chemotherapy. The questionnaire has 16 items measured with a 7-degree Likert-type scale. Patients self-reported. For the second cycle of chemotherapy, the groups were switched.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Crossover clinical trial
Morrow (Moro) questionnaire
The use of auricular acupressure was shown to help alleviate CINV when used along with standard antiemetics in patients with breast cancer receiving moderate to high-risk emetogenic chemotherapy.
Auricular acupressure is a safe, noninvasive, easy, patient-administered, nursing-centered, nonpharmacologic treatment and was shown to lower the number and intensity of nausea in both the acute and delayed phases of treatment.
Gardani, G., Cerrone, R., Biella, C., Galbiati, G., Proserpio, E., Casiraghi, M., … Lissoni, P. (2007). A progress study of 100 cancer patients treated by acupressure for chemotherapy-induced vomiting after failure of pharmacological approach. Minerva Medica, 98(6), 665-668.
To confirm the potential therapeutic efficacy of PC6 stimulation by acupressure in patients with cancer experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after failure with pharmacologic approaches
PC6 acupoint was stimulated by acupressure with a button (P6 nausea control Sea-Band®) for eight hours per day at home, starting before the onset of chemotherapy, and for at least three days after chemotherapy.
The study consisted of 100 consecutive patients with metastatic solid tumors admitted to receive chemotherapy for advanced disease.
Patients were included in the study if they had
The study was conducted in Italy.
World Health Organization criteria were used.
Overall, 68% of patients achieved control of emesis.
No significant differences in efficacy were observed in relation to tumor histotype.
The percentage of efficacy varied in relation to type of chemotherapy. The lowest results were observed in patients treated with anthracyclines, whereas more benefit was seen in patients with other chemotherapy agents. However, the efficacy achieved was greater than 50% in the treatment of vomiting because of anthracyclines.
The study confirmed the efficacy of acupressure in the treatment of CINV with a larger number of patients than previously studied. Acupressure appears to be effective in reducing vomiting experienced as a result of most commonly used chemotherapy agents.
Genç, A., Can, G., & Aydiner, A. (2012). The efficiency of the acupressure in prevention of the chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21, 253–261.
To examine the efficiency of acupressure in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and to determine the factors that affect this efficiency
Turkish researchers recruited patients with lung, breast, and gynecological cancer who were undergoing active treatment with medicines such as doxorubicin- or cisplatin-based drugs. The researchers randomized and assigned 67 patients in the experimental group and 53 patients in the control group. The experimental group was given a real nausea wristband (Sea-Band), and the control group was given a placebo nausea band. All patients in both groups also were given standard antiemetic treatment. They were instructed to use the wristband on both of their wrists for five days, except when sleeping at night, washing their hands, and taking a shower.
The study was conducted at a single site in Turkey. The setting type was not specified.
Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
The study was a cross-sectional, single blinded study.
The researchers stated that they created a patient description form to collect the demographic information, chemotherapy medications, and characteristics of the condition of the patients. They also used two measurements.
The researchers investigated whether acupressure affected the patients’ quality of life, as well as their experiences and development of nausea, vomiting, and retching. After five days of treatment, the results indicated that no statistically meaningful difference was observed between the control and experimental groups. Therefore, real acupressure application was not an effective strategy to increase the quality of life or to decrease the experience of CINV.
The statistical results show that after five days, both experimental and control groups had almost identical scores. Therefore, the real nausea wristband does not affect CINV or the quality of life.
The study shows that wristband acupressure is not effective in controlling CINV in patients with cancer. Additional studies are needed to confirm or refute this conclusion. Acupressure may need to be organ-site specific to control CINV.
Genc, F., & Tan, M. (2014). The effect of acupressure application on chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, and anxiety in patients with breast cancer. Palliative & Supportive Care. Advance online publication.
To determine the effects of acupressure applied to the pericardium 6 (P 6) acupuncture point on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and anxiety in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy
Stage 1–3 patients with breast cancer who were receiving cycle two and more advance-cycle chemotherapy in an ambulatory setting were trained to apply P 6 acupressure. Patients were randomly selected from a sample that met the study inclusion criteria. An acupressure wrist band was utilized with the research group. Patients were taught how to use the band with repeat demonstration. Patients continuously wore the acupressure band on both wrists for five days. Antiemetic medications used for the experimental and control group were not described.
The authors concluded that acupressure wristbands applied at the P 6 point decreased patients' nausea occurrence and experience and the overall experience and occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and retching combined. There was no effect on the occurrence or experience of vomiting or retching. Acupressure is an inexpensive intervention that may be able to provide additional relief to patients above and beyond recommended antiemetic therapy. Effects on anxiety are unclear.
Acupressure is inexpensive, is easy to use, and can be considered in conjugation with medication or CINV prophylaxis. Acupressure can be considered in addition to recommended antiemetic therapy for additional support of patients experiencing CINV.
Lee, J., Dibble, S., Dodd, M., Abrams, D., & Burns, B. (2010). The relationship of chemotherapy-induced nausea to the frequency of pericardium 6 digital acupressure. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37, E419–E425.
To explain the relationship between the intensity of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and the frequency of P6 digital acupressure in a group of patients with breast cancer who received moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy and applied P6 digital acupressure as an additional intervention for CINV control.
This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, longitudinal, randomized, clinical trial that compared differences in CINV among three groups (P6 acupressure, placebo digital acupressure, and usual care). The original study was published in 2007.
Patients in the group receiving P6 acupressure in the parent study were instructed to perform digital acupressure for three minutes or point release at the P6 points on both arms in the morning plus an additional three minutes of acupressure to one arm whenever nausea occurred. Secondary analysis was conducted of this group’s data from the patient information questionnaire and daily log.
This was a multisite study conducted at 15 different sites in the United States.
All patients were in active treatment.
The study was design was a descriptive secondary analysis.
Nausea intensity was not found to be consistently related to frequency of acupressure use.
Types and dosages of antiemetics used were not described.
Based on the results of the parent study and the indepth secondary analysis of the acupressure group, patients with CINV may benefit from P6 acupressure throughout the first 11 days after chemotherapy. Because each patient is different, individualized patient teaching and resources for managing CINV are important.
Melchart, D., Ihbe-Heffinger, A., Leps, B., von Schilling, C., & Linde, K. (2006). Acupuncture and acupressure for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea: A randomised cross-over pilot study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14, 878-882.
To study the effectiveness of acupuncture and acupressure in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea
Patients were treated for one cycle of chemotherapy with acupuncture and acupressure at point P6 and for one cycle at a close sham point. Participants were randomized to acupuncture at P6 or at a close nonacupuncture point, and it was delivered by one of two physicians with training and experience in acupuncture. Participants wore acupressure bands for 72 hours at the same points on both arms and could wear them for an additional four days if needed. The bands were covered with a mull bandage to blind the staff. Participants completed diaries for seven days, documenting intensity (on a 0-6 rating scale), frequency, and duration of nausea and vomiting; additional antiemetics taken; and, on day 7, rate the effectiveness of side effects or impairment by acupuncture or acupressure. Patients completed the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE). Oncology staff checked that the diaries were completed accurately, standard antiemetics regimens were followed, and if any adverse reactions related to acupuncture occurred.
The study was conducted by the hematology and gastroenterology departments of a large university hospital in Germany.
This was a randomized, crossover pilot study.
Molassiotis A, Helin AM, Dabbour R, Hummerston S. (2007). The effects of P6 acupressure in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 15(1), 3-12.
To study the effects of P6 acupressure in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with breast cancer.
Participants were randomized to the control or experimental arm and received standard antiemetics before chemotherapy with prescriptions for antiemetics for delayed CINV that were variable.
For the experimental group, acupressure was applied using a Sea-Band® (Sea-Band Ltd.) for five days after chemotherapy administration. Researchers taught patients how to wear the bands bilaterally with the stud pressing the P6 acupoint in brief education sessions. Patients were given daily logs with the hours of the day and asked to put a mark at the hour each time that they pressed the wristband’s stud. Patients were instructed to press the stud for two to three minutes every two hours throughout the day, marking it in their log.
The control group was given antiemetics and told that they would receive acupressure instructions and wristbands with their next cycle of chemotherapy.
All participants completed questionnaires every evening after chemotherapy for five evenings. Completed questionnaires were returned directly to researchers or via pre-paid envelopes.
This study was conducted at a general hospital and a cancer hospital in the United Kingdom.
This was a randomized, controlled trial.
The Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting was used.
Nausea and retching experience and nausea, vomiting, and retching occurrence and distress were significantly lower in the acupressure group than the control group.
At day 3, the acupressure group had a high level of nausea, vomiting, and retching, which was equal to the control group.
Acupressure at P6 is an effective intervention for managing CINV in patients with breast cancer.
Use of the acupressure bands is easy to teach, and the bands are low in cost.
Molassiotis, A., Russell, W., Hughes, J., Breckons, M., Lloyd-Williams, M., Richardson, J., ... Ryder, W. (2013). The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupressure for the control and management of chemotherapy-related acute and delayed nausea: Assessment of Nausea in Chemotherapy Research (ANCHoR), a randomised controlled trial. Health Technology Assessment,17(26), 1–114.
To determine the effectiveness of self-acupressure using wrist bands in the management of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and to assess if the wrist bands are more effective in high, moderate, or low emetogenic chemotherapies
Patients were randomized using a method of minimization with a random element. Randomization was balanced for gender, age, and levels of emetogenic chemotherapy. Both patients and treating physicians were blinded to group. Patients received an acupressure wrist band, a sham acupressure wrist band, or no wrist band. All patients received the standard antiemetic regimen based on American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) guidelines with the exception of NK1-receptor antagonists, which were not available. The acupressure wrist bands are elastic with a 1 cm round plastic button. The button was worn at the P6 acupoint after patients were trained on the appropriate location to wear the button. The sham wrist bands had the button on the outside of the elastic band, and the button was worn facing away from the P6 point. Patients wore the wrist bands beginning the morning before chemotherapy and for six days after each cycle. Main outcome data were collected at baseline the day before chemotherapy and daily for up to seven days after chemotherapy, and additional data were collected on day 10. Some patients also participated in a qualitative interview.
Randomized, three-group, sham-controlled trial (Phase III)
After the first cycle, there was no difference in the nausea level between any group, though there was a trend towards lower nausea scores for both the wrist band and sham wrist band groups. Qualitative interviews indicate that patients perceived both real and sham wrist bands as helpful in managing CINV.
Acupressure wrist bands are not an effective intervention in the management of CINV.
Nurses can educate patients that acupressure wrist bands are not an effective intervention to manage CINV.
Molassiotis, A., Russell, W., Hughes, J., Breckons, M., Lloyd-Williams, M., Richardson, J., … Ryder, W.D. (2013). The effectiveness of acupressure for the control and management of chemotherapy-related acute and delayed nausea: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Advanced online publication.
To determine the effectiveness of acupressure in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: use of P6 acupressure wristband, sham acupressure wristband, or usual care only.
Prior to randomization, subjects were stratified by age group, gender, and emetogenicity of planned chemotherapy. Patients were instructed to wear wristbands on both arms from the morning before chemotherapy administration and for the following 6 days, and to only remove them for showering or bathing.
All patients received antiemetics based on American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) guidelines with the exception that NK1 receptor antagonists were not used with highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as these were not widely available in the country.
All patients had rescue antiemetics available. Study questionnaires were completed on day 10 of each cycle. Patients graded nausea daily.
The study was conducted at multiple outpatient sites in the United Kingdom.
All patients were in active antitumor treatment.
This was a randomized controlled trial.
Measurement tools used were
P6 acupressure was not shown to have a significant impact on prevention of CINV. Findings suggest a potential placebo effect with both acupressure and sham acupressure wristbands.
Findings did not show a significant effect of P6 acupressure on CINV; however, use of an actual and sham acupressure wristband may have a placebo effect.
Roscoe, J.A., O’Neill, M., Jean-Pierre, P., Heckler, C.E., Kaptchuk, T.J., Bushunow, P., … Smith, B. (2010). An exploratory study on the effects of an expectancy manipulation on chemotherapy-related nausea. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40, 379–390.
To test whether providing information about the expected efficacy of acupressure bands would enhance their effectiveness in reducing nausea
The study was conducted in a single outpatient setting. The location was not stated.
All patients were in active treatment.
This was a double-blind, four-arm, randomized, clinical intervention study.
Patients with enhanced information required less antiemetics and had less nausea than patients with neutral information. Managing expectations may facilitate chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) management.
This study illustrates the need for nurses to assess and be aware of patient’s nausea expectations during chemotherapy. Patients with high expectations may benefit from information or discussion of the expected benefits of interventions on reducing nausea.
Shen, C.H., & Yang, L.Y. (2016). The effects of acupressure on meridian energy as well as nausea and vomiting in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Biological Research for Nursing, 19, 145–152.
To explore the effects of acupressure on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
A convenience sample of patients was recruited, and patients were randomized to receive acupressure on two sites on both sides of the body or acupoint patches on a single site on both sides of the body. All patients were receiving standard triplet antiemetics. Study data were collected prior to and after the acupressure intervention and 48 hours after chemotherapy. Study data were collected three times—before chemotherapy, before dinner on the day of chemotherapy, and before breakfast on the following day. The acupressure group had pressure applied to the PC6 and SP4 points on both sides of the body, for three minutes on each point.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Two group, randomized trial
The mean meridian energy was significantly higher in the group receiving acupressure after the intervention (p = 0.003) compared to those who had acupoint patches. Analysis showed an effect on study groups across all study measurement times, with lower nausea (p < 0.001) and vomiting (p = 0.023) severity in the acupressure group.
Acupressure on PC6 and SP4 acupoints prior to chemotherapy and meals was associated with a lower severity of nausea and vomiting.
The use of acupressure as an adjunct to standard antiemetic treatment may reduce the severity of CINV in patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. Nausea is still not well controlled in most individuals with maximal antiemetic use. Acupressure is a low-risk intervention that may be helpful for CINV control, specifically nausea control.
Shin, Y.H., Kim, T.I., Shin, M.S., & Juon, H. (2004). Effect of acupressure on nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy cycle for Korean postoperative stomach cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 27, 267-274.
The study took place in a university medical center in metropolitan South Korea. Participants were on inpatient oncology wards.
This study had a nonequivalent control group design for a single cycle of chemotherapy.
Significant differences existed between the control and intervention groups in the severity of nausea and vomiting, duration of nausea, and frequency of vomiting.
Suh, E.E. (2012). The effects of P6 acupressure and nurse-provided counseling on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39(1), E1-9.
To evaluate the effects of pericardium 6 (P6) acupressure and nurse-provided counseling on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with breast cancer
Participants were randomized to one of four treatment groups. The control group received sham acupressure on SI3 point—the ulnar side of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the little finger of both hands. The three experimental groups consisted of counseling only, P6 acupressure-only, and P6 acupressure and counseling.
Counseling consisted of a one-hour cognitive behavioral session which included an introduction, cognitive preparation, symptom acceptance, the use of available resources, and question and answer session. Participants were instructed to perform the cognitive-behavioral session daily for 5 days (C2, D 1-5).
The P6 acupressure groups wore Sea-Band® bands on both wrists for 5 days.
All participants completed baseline data then received a booklet of instruments and a daily log. They were asked to check their gastrointestinal (GI) distress level nine different times the evening of the first day of cycle 2 of chemotherapy and then once in the morning and once in the evening of days 2–5. Patients were asked to keep a daily log of the antiemetic medications taken and the overall status of their GI symptoms. The research assistants called each participant once and sent two text messages during the 5-day period to increase adherence.
This study was conducted at a single outpatient setting in Seoul, South Korea.
All patients were in active treatment.
This was a randomized, controlled trial.
Synergic effects of P6 acupressure with nurse-provided counseling appeared to be effective in reducing CINV in patients with breast cancer.
The addition of P6 acupressure and nurse-provided counseling focused on cognitive awareness, affective readiness, symptom acceptance, and the use of available resources both appear to be effective as adjuncts to antiemetic medicine for the control of CINV in patients with breast cancer.
Taspinar, A., & Sirin, A. (2010). Effect of acupressure on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in gynecologic cancer patients in Turkey. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14, 49–54.
To evaluate the effect of a wristband acupressure for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with gynecologic cancers
Patients completed diaries daily for five days while they were receiving chemotherapy. Based on their treatment protocol, patients received a wristband 21 to 28 days later, along with written and verbal instructions and demonstration on its use. Patients were instructed to wear the wristbands constantly and to complete the patient diaries for the five days while receiving chemotherapy. On the sixth day, patients completed questionnaires about the wristbands. All patients received standard antiemetics and recorded medication use in their diaries.
The study was conducted at multiple outpatient sites in Turkey.
All patients were in active treatment.
This was a prospective clinical trial with a pre/post-test design.
Acupressure wristbands worn by patients with gynecologic cancers during chemotherapy administration were associated with a significant reduction in nausea but not vomiting or retching. Less antiemetic medication was used with the acupressure wristband.
Acupressure wristbands may provide some relief of nausea during chemotherapy treatment; however, they do not appear to provide relief from retching or vomiting.
Greenlee, H., Balneaves, L.G., Carlson, L.E., Cohen, M., Deng, G., Hershman, D., . . . Society for Integrative Oncology. (2014). Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute.Monographs, 2014, 346–358.
4,900 references were identified that were published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2013. 203 articles were included in the final review although only 174 were referenced. Grades used and reported here were A: recommended, high certainty of benefit, B: recommended, high certainty of moderate to substantial benefit, D: recommends against use, moderate to high certainty of no net benefit, and H: recommends against use, moderate to high certainty that harms outweigh benefits.
Interventions for specific symptoms that had strong recommendations for or against use were:
It appears that only specific types of interventions were included, and there are numerous types of integrative or complementary interventions that were not considered in this review. The findings considered were limited to women with breast cancer. Quality rating of evidence was not discussed individually.
These guidelines provided an evidence-based evaluation of various integrative therapies in women with breast cancer. This set of interventions is not all-inclusive; however, it does provide some guidance to clinicians and others regarding evidence strength in these areas as assessed by this specific study group.