Chlorhexadine is an antiseptic that has broad spectrum effect against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Use of a foam dressing containing chlorhexadine for central lines was examined in patients with cancer for prevention of central line infection.
Arvaniti, K., Lathyris, D., Clouva-Molyvdas, P., Haidich, A.B., Mouloudi, E., Synnefaki, E., . . . Catheter-Related Infections in ICU (CRI-ICU) Group. (2012). Comparison of oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Critical Care Medicine, 40, 420–429.
To evaluate the effectiveness of oligon central venous catheters (CVC) and chlorhexidine biopatch to reduce CVC-related infections. Oligon catheters are impregnated with antimicrobial silver, platinum, and carbon.
Patients were randomized to receive either a standard polyurethane catheter, a standard catheter plus biopatch, or an oligon catheter. All catheters were triple lumen. Standard maximum barrier insertion techniques were used, and dressing change frequency was every three days with a transparent dressing. Those getting the biopatch had the biopatch changed with regular dressing changes. The primary study endpoint was catheter colonization. A decision to remove the catheter was made by individual physicians.
There were no differences in catheter colonization rates, CRI, or CLABSI between groups. There were no differences between groups in number of catheter days, CLABSI incidence per 1,000 catheter days, or other factors potentially associated with development of CLABSI. Analysis showed that use of jugular or femoral insertion site and cancer diagnosis were significantly associated with development of catheter colonization (p < 0.05).
Findings did not support efficacy of BIOPATCH dressings or antimicrobial catheters for prevention of catheter-related colonization or infections.
Findings did not show efficacy of chlorhexidine-BIOPATCH CVC dressings or antimicrobial impregnated short-term catheters to prevent catheter colonization and related CVC-infection related outcomes.
Biehl, L.M., Huth, A., Panse, J., Kramer, C., Hentrich, M., Engelhardt, M., . . . Vehreschild, M.J. (2016). A randomized trial on chlorhexidine dressings for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients. Annals of Oncology, 27, 1916–1922.
To compare the effects of chlorhexidine-containing dressings and nonchlorhexidine dressing on catheter-related infections (CRIs) in neutropenic patients
Patients were randomized to receive either a transparent central venous catheter (CVC) dressing with a chlorhexidine gel pad or the transparent dressing without the gel pad. All catheters were nontunneled and placed in the subclavian or internal jugular vein with strict aseptic technique. Dressings were changed every 3–4 days. In the case of neutropenic fever, blood cultures were drawn, and if central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) were suspected, the catheter was removed and the tip was sent for culture. Patients were followed for 14 days.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
The study was discontinued early because the interim analysis did not show a significant difference in the primary endpoint of the study (definitive CLABSI) and further enrollment was not expected to make a difference. The incidence of probable bloodstream infection was less frequent in the study group (p = 0.014). No differences existed in sepsis, infection-related mortality. More unscheduled dressing changes occurred in the control group. Patients with coated CVCs had higher rates of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infection (p = 0.007).
The use of a chlorhexidine gel pad CVC dressing was associated with a lower incidence of probable CLABSI but did not demonstrate a significant effect on definite catheter-related bloodstream infection within 14 days of CVC placement.
Although this study did not show an effect of chlorhexidine gel pad CVC dressings on definitive CLABSI within 14 days, the gel pad dressing was associated with a lower incidence of probable catheter-related infection. This study had a large sample but was underpowered because of an overall low incidence of definitive CLABSI. The findings suggest that the use of a dressing with a chlorhexidine pad may be beneficial in reducing catheter-related infections.
Chambers, S.T., Sanders, J., Patton, W.N., Ganly, P., Birch, M., Crump, J.A., & Spearing, R.L. (2005). Reduction of exit-site infections of tunnelled intravascular catheters among neutropenic patients by sustained-release chlorhexidine dressings: Results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hospital Infection, 61, 53–61.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of sustained-release chlorhexidine (CHX) dressings versus standard dressings.
All adult patients admitted under the hematology service that were to receive chemotherapy and had a tunneled cuffed central intravascular catheter inserted were eligible for inclusion. After insertion, all tunneled intravascular catheters were randomized, but they were treated in the same manner with a sterile gauze and porous adhesive dressings until the exit site was dry and free from ooze. Those randomized to standard catheter exit-site treatment (control group) received no dressing in accordance with BCHS guidelines. The CHX group (intervention group) were treated with CHX dressings consisting of a 2.5 cm hydrophilic polyurethane foam disk containing CHX gluconate in a sustained-release formulation. These were applied to the exit site as soon the oozing had stopped following intravascular catheter insertion, and changed as needed or weekly until the catheter was removed. The same treatment was continued for the life of the catheter but if an intravascular catheter was removed and replaced, the new catheter was randomized. Exit site and tunnels were routinely examined on a weekly basis.
The primary endpoint of this study was the development of exit-site and/or tunnel infection. The secondary endpoint was removal of the catheter for infection. In total, 114 tunneled intravascular catheters in 95 patients were randomized from August 1998 to December 2001.
A single-site inpatient hematology unit
Prospective, randomized
All patients received a 10F vascular catheter with a surecuff tissue ingrowth, vitacuff antimicrobial cuff inserted percutaneously by a radiologist using the Seldinger technique.
Definitions used:
This study has shown that the use of CHX dressings was associated with less exit site infections (OR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.04, 0.37], p < 0.001). The rate of premature catheter removal for these infections was reduced approximately three fold in the CHX group (OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.07, 0.77]). The failures of the CHX dressing group were associated either with a very early occurrence after insertion of the catheter, suggesting that the infecting organisms were implanted at the time of catheter insertion, or with delays in application of the CHX dressing. Positive blood cultures occurred in fewer patients in the control group (p < 0.01) with less isolates of gram-positive organisms in the control group (p < 0.05).
This study demonstrated that use of the sustained-release CHX dressing was associated with reduced extralumenal catheter infections; however, it was not associated with fewer blood stream infections.
Sustained-release CHX dressings may help to reduce some central line-associated infections in patients with cancer who are at risk and in whom other aspects of catheter insertion and care are in place. Further well-designed research in this area is warranted.
Ruschulte, H., Franke, M., Gastmeier, P., Zenz, S., Mahr, K.H., Buchholz, S., . . . Piepenbrock, S. (2009). Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Hematology, 88, 267–272.
To evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine sponges in prevention of central venous catheter infections inserted for cancer chemotherapy
All patients received chlorhexidine and silver-impregnated, triple-lumen central venous catheters (CVC) that were intended for at least five-day use. Catheter insertion was done using maximal barriers, and skin antisepsis was done with alcohol. Catheter dressings were changed weekly. Patients expected to have catheters in place for less than five days were not included in the study.
Mean catheter duration was 15.8 days among controls and 16.6 days in the experimental group. Among the treatment group were 19 cases of CVC infection (3.8 per 1,000 catheter days) compared to 34 cases (7 per 1,000 catheter days) in the control group (p = 0.016).
The use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings was associated with a lower rate of catheter-related infections.
This study demonstrated supportive evidence for efficacy of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings in CVC care to reduce the incidence of catheter-related infections. Patients with hematologic cancers receiving chemotherapy as included here are generally at high risk for infection. Interventions that can reduce the risk of infection in this patient population are important to incorporate into practice.
Timsit, J.F., Schwebel, C., Bouadma, L., Geffroy, A., Garrouste-Orgeas, M., Pease, S., . . . Dressing Study Group. (2009). Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 301, 1231–1241.
To assess chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressings for prevention of catheter-related infections
Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Groups were (a) standard dressing every three days, (b) chlorhexidine sponge dressing every three days, (c) standard dressing every seven days, and (d) chlorhexidine dressing every seven days. Insertion sites were the radial artery or subclavian vein whenever possible. Insertions were done with maximal barriers and antisepsis techniques. Semitransparent dressings were used for all. Povidone-idodine was used for skin antisepsis with each dressing change. Patients were followed for 48 hours after discharge from the ICU. A noninferiority analysis was planned with the identification of a 3% difference in catheter-related infection (CRI) rate as the comparison value. Only cultured catheters were considered to compare three- versus seven-day dressing intervals.
Use of chlorhexidine dressings overall were associated with a 0.6 CRI rate compared to 1.4 in the control groups per 1,000 catheter days (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, p = 0.03). Of those assigned to seven-day dressings, 50.6% had more frequent unplanned dressing changes. There was no significant difference in colonization rate between those having three- and seven-day dressing intervals. There was a slight but insignificant increase in skin colonization in the seven-day group at the time of catheter removal. Overall, the rate of central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was lower (p = 0.005) with sponge dressings.
Use of chlorhexidine sponge dressing reduced the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Analysis by dressing change interval did not show any significant difference in outcomes.
Findings showed lower CLABSI rate and risk with use of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressings. Findings also suggest no difference in infection outcomes related to catheters according to the frequency of dressing changes, although more than half of patients assigned to dressing changes every seven days needed changes more frequently for soiling or separation. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings can reduce CLABSI rate, and less frequent catheter dressing changes can be done with no apparent increase in infections.
O’Grady, N.P., Alexander, M., Burns, L.A., Dellinger, E.P., Garland, J., Heard, S.O., . . . Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). (2011). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-2011.pdf
To provide evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections for healthcare personnel who insert and care for intravascular catheters and for those responsible for surveillance and infection control in hospital, outpatient, and home health settings. Patients addressed in the guidelines were adult and pediatric patients with intravascular catheters.
The resource is comprised of evidence-based guidelines. For the development process, evidence was categorized as category 1A to category 2 based on strength of recommendation and support from clinical or epidemiological studies.
The results were not summarized.
The guidelines provided extensive recommendations regarding the education and training of staff; selection of catheters and sites, including avoidance of the femoral vein for central venous access and use of the central venous catheter with the minimum number of ports needed; hand hygiene; use of maximal sterile barrier precautions for insertion; skin preparation with alcohol, iodine, or chlorhexidine; use of standard catheter site dressing regimens; specific aspects of care for umbilical and dialysis catheters; and use of piggybacks, stopcocks, and catheter flushing. Guideline recommendations include a bundling of multiple recommendations: antimicrobial-impregnated catheters and cuffs are recommended in patients with long-term use if the organizational central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) rate is not decreasing despite the implementation of comprehensive strategies for improvement. Lower-level (category II) recommendations include the use of prophylactic antimicrobial lock solutions in patients with long-term catheters who have a history of CLABSIs despite optimal aseptic technique as well as daily cleansing of patients in the intensive care unit with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths. Recommends changing IV administration sets no more often than every 96 hours unless used for blood products. For needleless components, recommends changing according to administration set timing as above, and states no benefit to changing more than every 72 hours.
Provides extensive recommendations for management of all types of intravenous catheters and system components. Nurses should refer to the full set of guidelines for all specific aspects of care.