Glutamine is the most abundant amino acid in the body, comprising 60% of the free amino acid pool. Glutamine requirements increase during periods of metabolic stress and, therefore, glutamine is considered a conditionally essential amino acid. Glutamine is the primary fuel for rapidly dividing cells, including enterocytes, colonocytes, fibroblasts, and lymphocytes. Individuals deficient in glutamine often present with changes in gastrointestinal morphology, resulting in bacterial translocation, malabsorption, and diarrhea. Researchers have also found that Individuals deficient in glutamine may present with impaired wound healing and/or impaired immune function. Glutamine is available as a dietary supplement without prescription. Glutamine has been examined for management of diarrhea, mucositis, and peripheral neuropathy.
Amara, S. (2008). Oral glutamine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 42, 1481–1485.
The purpose of the study was to determine what role glutamine plays in preventing peripheral neuropathy.
The author searched PubMed from 1990 to May 2008 with the key words glutamine, chemotherapy, peripheral neuropathy, neurotoxicity, safety, paclitaxel, platinum compounds, and vinca alkloids. To be included, studies had to evaluate the role of oral glutamine in preventing and treating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Studies were excluded if they used glutamine in the reduction of other radiation or chemotherapy-induced related toxicities such as mucositis, cardiotoxicity, diarrhea, and cachexia.
Three clinical trials were reviewed for sample, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study design, and results given. No type of measurement was used to review the study quality. Of note, the article did not state if other studies were found in the literature review.
Study 1 suggested that glutamine helps to decrease symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. Study 2 suggested that glutamine can help prevent some symptoms of CIPN. And, finally, study 3 suggested that glutamine may reduce the occurrence of CPIN.
Although each study had a small sample size, glutamine did appear to help reduce symptoms of neuropathy. However, the systematic review concluded that a lack of sufficient evidence existed to recommend oral glutamine for the prevention of CIPN. Glutamine could be beneficial in patients receiving high-dose paclitaxel and oxaliplatin.
The safety and tolerability of glutamine was not mentioned.
Bradfield, S.M., Sandler, E., Geller, T., Tamura, R.N., & Krischer, J.P. (2015). Glutamic acid not beneficial for the prevention of vincristine neurotoxicity in children with cancer. Pediatric Blood and Cancer, 62, 1004–1010.
To determine if glutamic acid is an effective preventative therapy in children with vincristine-associated neurotoxicity
Before the first treatment of vincristine, patients were stratified into stratum 1 or stratum 2. Stratum 1 included patients with Wilms tumor or rhabdomyosarcoma who were to receive nine weeks of vincristine; stratum 2 included patients with acute lympoblastic leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma who were to receive four weeks of vincristine. Both groups were randomized to receive L-glutamic acid hydrochloride or placebo three times a day until seven days after week 4 or week 9 of vincristine. The placebo was administered in the same manner.
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial
Patients who received glutamic acid did not have significantly less neurotoxicity symptoms compared to the placebo group. The subgroup of patients aged 13 years or older experienced more benefits from glutamic acid (0.28, p = 0.055) compared to patients younger than 13 years. Neurotoxicity rated less than 0.02 (p = 1) but was not statistically significant.
Glutamic acid is not considered an effective preventative treatment of neurotoxicities in preadolescents.
Glutamic acid is not recommended for the prevention of neurotoxicities in pediatric patients at this time.
Loven, D., Levavi, H., Sabach, G., Zart, R., Andras, M., Fishman, A., . . . Gadoth, N. (2009). Long-term glutamate supplementation failed to protect against peripheral neurotoxicity of paclitaxel. European Journal of Cancer Care, 18, 78–83.
The focus of the study was to evaluate the role of glutamate supplementation in preventing paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Patients were randomized to receive daily placebo or 500 mg glutamate supplementation beginning on the first day of chemotherapy. Treatment was continued throughout six cycles of chemotherapy and for an additional three weeks. Patients were assessed for neuropathy with serial electro-diagnostic measurements at baseline and at the end of the study.
The total sample consisted of 43 women with a median age of 59 years (range of 35–80 years) who were diagnosed with gynecologic cancers and were receiving paclitaxel.
The study was conducted in multiple outpatient sites throughout Israel.
Phase of care
The study had a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial design.
An indication of peripheral neuropathic toxicity was lower in patients receiving glutamate, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, significantly lower pain levels were noted in the glutamate group (p = 0.011). No differences were found between groups regarding electro-diagnostic measurements.
The study does not provide strong support for the benefit of glutamate in the prevention of peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving paclitaxel. No firm conclusions can be drawn due to study limitations.
The findings suggest that glutamate does not prevent peripheral neuropathy during treatment with paclitaxel. Conclusions are limited due to study deficiencies.
Mokhtar, G.M., Shaaban, S.Y., Elbarbary, N.S., & Fayed, W.A. (2010). A trial to assess the efficacy of glutamic acid in prevention of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity in pediatric malignancies: A pilot study. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 32, 594–600.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of glutamic acid as a modifier in vincristine-induced neurotoxicity.
Children were randomized to treatment or placebo groups during adjuvant treatment with vincristine. Patients were evaluated weekly by physical examination. The treatment group received glutamic acid 1.5 g orally per day in three divided doses during a four-week induction with vincristine.
The study was conducted at a single site in Egypt.
Phase of Care
Clinical Applications
The study had a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design.
Achilles and patellar reflexes were decreased at weeks 3 and 4 in more patients receiving placebo. Prevalence of mild parasthesias was greater in the placebo group at week 4. No severe parasthesias were recorded in the glutamic acid group compared to an incidence rate of 7.5% in the placebo group. The differences were not statistically significant.
The findings suggest that glutamic acid may be helpful in reducing vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms in pediatric patients.
The findings suggest that glutamic acid may be helpful in managing peripheral neuropathy from vincristine; however, several study limitations exist. Additional well-designed research in this area is warranted.
Sands, S., Ladas, E.J., Kelly, K.M., Weiner, M., Lin, M., Ndao, D.H., . . . Bender, J.G. (2017). Glutamine for the treatment of vincristine-induced neuropathy in children and adolescents with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 701–708.
To examine the efficacy and safety of glutamine to reduce vincristine-induced neuropathy in children and adolescents
Patients expected to receive a cumulative dose of 6 mg/m2 over a 30-week period were randomized to receive glutamine or placebo. Participants' families were contacted weekly to answer questions and monitor compliance and monitor adverse effects. Study medications were provided in a powder formulation to be mixed in juice for oral administration. Study measures were obtained at baseline, after 21 days, and on day 42 after a wash-out period. Glutamine was given at a dose of 6 g/m2 twice daily up to a maximum dose of 10 g.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, controlled trial
Seventy-eight percent developed peripheral neuropathy as defined by CTCAE. There was no correlation between CTCAE and other testing results. A higher number of those receiving placebo had increased CTCAE sensory neuropathy scores compared to those on glutamine (p = 0.02) on day 21. There was no difference between groups on day 42. There were no differences between groups in motor neuropathy scores.
Glutamine had a protective effect for sensory neuropathy in this study. Varied measures for peripheral neuropathy were not correlated, pointing to the need for ongoing research to identify the most valid and reliable measures for assessment.
There have been mixed findings regarding the benefits of glutamine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. This study demonstrated some benefit, although limited by sample size. Ongoing research is needed for determination of any potential role of glutamine for the prevention of neuropathy with agents associated with this side effect.
Stubblefield, M.D., Vahdat, L.T., Balmaceda, C.M., Troxel, A.B., Hesdorffer, C.S., & Gooch, C.L. (2005). Glutamine as a neuroprotective agent in high-dose paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: A clinical and electrophysiologic study. Clinical Oncology, 17, 271–276.
The study examined the neuroprotective effect of glutamine.
Seventeen patients received 10 g of glutamine administered three times daily for a total of four days beginning 24 hours after completion of paclitaxel. The remaining 29 patients made up the control group. Neurologic assessments and electrodiagnostic (nerve conduction) studies were carried out at baseline and at least two weeks (median 32 days) after treatment by a neurologist. Neurologic signs and symptoms also were assessed.
The study sample consisted of 46 patients who received high-dose paclitaxel prior to stem cell transplantation.
The study had a retrospective, non-randomized design.
Patients who received glutamine developed less weakness, less loss of vibratory sensation, and less toe numbness compared to those in the control group. A trend toward reducing symptoms of finger numbness was noted. In the comparison group, three patients developed foot drop and four patients developed tibialis weakness.
The mechanism of neuroprotection conferred by glutamine is unclear; some evidence suggests a correlation between treatment-induced reduction in nerve growth and severity of neurotoxicity.
The limitations of this study include it not being randomized or blinded as well as the fact that no placebo control group was used.
Results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size and the non-randomized, retrospective design.
Vahdat, L., Papadopoulos, K., Lange, D., Leuin, S., Kaufman, E., Donovan, D., . . . Balmaceda, C. (2001). Reduction of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy with glutamine. Clinical Cancer Research, 7, 1192–1197.
Female participants were were admitted for cyclophosphamide (6,000 mg/m²), thiotepa (500 mg/m²) and carboplatin (800 mg/m²) over 96 hours seven and four days prior to stem cell transplantation. Mesna (7,400 mg/m²; 1,500 mg/m² per day) was administered by continuous infusion over 120 hours. After December 1998, women enrolled in the study received glutamine (10 g orally three times daily) for four days starting 24 hours after the completion of paclitaxel. Data were collected at baseline and two weeks after completion of chemotherapy. In addition, paired pre- and post-paclitaxel evaluations were performed on all women.
Women who received glutamine had fewer symptoms, with 8% of women who received glutamine reporting dysesthesias in the fingers and toes, as compared to 40% of the women who did not receive glutamine. In addition, the frequency of moderate to severe numbness was observed less often in the glutamine-treated group than in the non-glutamine group for both fingers and toes. Moderate to severe parasthesias also were observed less frequently in those who received glutamine.
Wang, W.S., Lin, J.K., Lin, T.C., Chen, W.S., Jiang, J.K., Wang, H.S., . . Chen, P.M. (2007). Oral glutamine is effective for preventing oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients. Oncologist, 12, 312–319.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether oral glutamine reduced the incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving oxaliplatin.
A total sample size of 86 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled. Forty-two patients received glutamine and 44 did not. Patients received oxaliplatin 85 mgm/m², 5-FU bolus 500 mgm/m², and folinic acid 20 mgm/m². Patients received glutamine 15 g twice a day for seven days every two weeks starting on the day of treatment. Patients were assessed at baseline for neurological toxicity and electrophysiological toxicity and again assessed at cycles 2, 4, and 6.
The 86 patients enrolled in the study had adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum.
The study took place from September 2004 to December 2005.
The study had a non-randomized, pilot design.
Glutamine supplementation significantly reduced the incidence and severity of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. After two cycles of treatment, grade 1–2 sensory neuropathy was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the control group. The percentage of grade 3–4 sensory neuropathy was lower in the glutamine group after four cycles of treatment and remained that way for six cycles. In addition, glutamine supplements lowered peripheral nerve hyperexcitability and interference with activities of daily living. Glutamine supplementation also reduces the need for oxaliplatin dose reduction without affecting response to chemotherapy and survival.
Glutamine is a potential neuroprotective agent that needs to be studied in larger populations in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Stubblefield, M.D., Burstein, H.J., Burton, A.W., Custodio, C.M., Deng, G.E., Ho, M., . . . Von Roenn, J.H. (2009). NCCN task force report: Management of neuropathy in cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 7(Suppl., 5), S1–S26.
This study outlines the common antineoplastic agents known to cause neuropathy and provides information on incidence, onset dosages, the signs and symptoms, and general course and patterns of resolution. Agents identified include platinum compounds, vinca alkaloids, taxanes, bortezomib, ixabepilone, thalidomide, and lenalidomide. In addition to outlining the mechanisms of neuropathy development in cancer, the study discusses neurophysiologic and objective testing, noting that findings on electromyographic (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) can lag behind clinical symptoms. The study also identifies commonly used physician-based grading systems, including the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) systems, and notes that these two grading systems lack inter-rater reliability. Patient-based instruments for assessment include the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT) and the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ). The authors note that the routine assessment of pain secondary to neuropathy, using instruments such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), is useful.
Routine assessment should be conducted and continued throughout therapy. Key points in assessment that should be included are:
Proposed agents for prevention of CIPN identified include:
Agents used for pain management:
Current literature is inconclusive on the benefits of neurostimulation in treating CIPN. The authors note that evidence is scarce on efficacy of complimentary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies and the need for appropriately powered and controlled studies in this area. However, acupuncture was identified as a promising adjunct option. The article also provides safety tips and issues for management of functional deficits in PIN, including situations in which to avoid or discontinue physical training, footwear selection, orthosis, and safety aspects of the household environment. Finally, the article addresses how autonomic neuropathy from chemotherapy occurs, but has not been well documented or studied.
The article provides a comprehensive review of current knowledge about CIPN and common approaches toward assessment, prevention, and management. The authors do not make specific recommendations for treatment, research to validate evaluation tools, and exploration of combinations and scheduling of pain medications. In addition, testing of the safety and effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and dietary supplements are needed.