Healing touch is an energy-based therapeutic approach to healing (Poznanski-Hutchinson, 1999; Mentgen, 1996). Healing touch uses touch to influence the body’s energy system, thus affecting physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual health and healing (Mentgen, 2001). The goal of healing touch is to restore balance in clients’ energy systems, thereby placing clients in a position to self-heal.
Mentgen, J. (1996). The clinical practice of healing touch. Imprint, 43, 33–36.
Mentgen, J. (2001). Healing touch. Holistic Nursing Care, 36, 143–157.
Poznanski-Hutchinson, C. (1999). Healing touch: An energetic approach. American Journal of Nursing, 99, 43–48.
Gonella, S., Garrino, L., & Dimonte, V. (2014). Biofield therapies and cancer-related symptoms: A review. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18, 568–576.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
APPLICATIONS: Palliative care
Interventions considered to be BT were healing touch, Reiki, and therapeutic touch. The effect on pain was examined in seven studies. There were some mixed findings, but most showed a reduction in pain over short time periods. Fatigue was assessed in five studies. These demonstrated fatigue reduction post-treatment, but data were conflicting over a longer period of four to eight weeks. Anxiety and depression were examined in seven studies. All but one found a significant reduction in mood disorders, but a study comparing Reiki, sham Reiki, and usual care found no difference between the sham and actual Reiki groups. Most studies were of descriptive or quasi-experimental design; potential confounding variables were not examined, and placebo effects could not be ruled out.
Studies using biofield therapies for relief of pain, anxiety, fatigue, and depression generally showed benefit; however, the evidence is not strong due to the limitations of the studies included.
Low-quality design studies and the short duration of study follow-up
BT therapies have not demonstrated effectiveness in well-designed clinical studies; however, though it is weak, evidence suggests potential benefit. There were no adverse effects of these interventions reported. Biofield therapies are not expensive and are low-risk, so they can be considered in the management of cancer-related symptoms. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to establish efficacy.
Jain, S., & Mills, P. J. (2010). Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 1–16.
To determine whether biofield therapies affect positive health outcomes and reduce disease symptoms.
Databases searched were PubMed, CINAHL, PyscINFO, and Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED).
Search keywords were spiritual healing, subtle energy, energy healing, biofield healing, external qi therapy, emitted chi, emitted qi, qi therapy, Johrei, pranic healing, polarity therapy, Reiki, therapeutic touch, and healing touch. Investigators also manually searched the reference sections of studies and review papers.
Studies were included if they
Studies were excluded if they related to distant healing or intercessory prayer; integrated modalities that were not biofield-based modalities with biofield-based modalities in such a way that the interventions could not be separated; were animal, plant, and/or in vitro studies; were clinical studies with group assignment but without randomization; were purely descriptive studies; or were unpublished dissertations.
Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
The authors presented results according to type of patient and levels of evidence.
Proximally practiced biofield therapies are promising complementary interventions as means of reducing pain intensity in multiple populations, reducing anxiety in hospitalized populations, and reducing agitated behaviors in patients with dementia. The long-term effects of the therapies on fatigue and autonomic nervous system activity are unclear.
Future research should compare biofield therapies with empirically supported treatments for specific conditions.
Aghabati, N., Mohammadi, E., & Pour Esmaiel, Z. (2010). The effect of therapeutic touch on pain and fatigue of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 7, 375–381.
To examine the effect of therapeutic touch (TT) on pain and fatigue in patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Patients were randomized to one of three groups: the TT group; the placebo group, which underwent a procedure that mimicked TT; or the control group, which received standard treatment. Interventions were used for five days. Patients in the TT group received 30 minutes of TT delivered by a trained researcher. The same researcher delivered all interventions.
The study was a randomized, controlled trial with an intervention group and a usual care control.
TT was more effective at decreasing pain and fatigue than were placebo and control treatments. The placebo arm showed \"control\" that was superior to that in the control group.
TT may decrease pain and fatigue scores in patients undergoing chemotherapy. The fact that a therapist must receive significant training to deliver TT may affect the practicality of the intervention.
Danhauer, S. C., Tooze, J. A., Holder, P., Miller, C., & Jesse, M. T. (2008). Healing touch as a supportive intervention for adult acute leukemia patients: a pilot investigation of effects on distress and symptoms. Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology, 6, 89–97.
To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized, clinical trial testing the effectiveness of healing touch (HT) for patients undergoing induction for acute leukemia and to obtain preliminary data to determine the effect size.
A prospective cohort of patients was selected to participate in the intervention trial. They completed self-report questionnaires and rated fatigue, nausea, pain, and distress at baseline, within seven days of hospital admission. Follow-up data collection was performed during the fifth week of hospitalization or prior to discharge. The HT intervention consisted of nine 30-minute sessions during weeks 2, 3, and 4. Family members were allowed to stay or leave during the session, depending on patient preference. All who provided the sessions were certified and had at least two years of experience with HT. All sessions were provided to the patient by the same practitioner. Sessions were standardized and included (1) the practitioner setting an intention for the patients’ highest good and (2) a standardized sequence of hand positions progressing from the ankles upward to the top of the head, with the hands placed either touching the patient or several inches above the body for one minute.
Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
The study was a prospective trial.
Of the individuals approached for study participation, 48% declined (66% due to lack of interest and 34% due to medical issues or feeling too ill). Three patients who initially entered withdrew, one due to family request and concerns about interference with medical treatment, one due to medical complications, and one after speaking with his minister who had religious objections to participation.
There were no significant changes from baseline to the five-week follow-up measurement on the MDASI, sleep quality measures, or POMS.
There were significant improvements on the patient self-report scale for fatigue (–1.8 change; p < 0.01) and nausea (–0.5 change; p < 0.01). Changes in distress were not significant. There were no changes in pain, and baseline values for pain were low (median = 1), although patient feedback suggested short-term pain reduction and improved sleep.
Of the patients, 91% liked HT “very much,” and most stated they felt more calm and relaxed during and after the sessions. All said they would recommend HT to others, and eight patients (73%) wanted to continue using HT.
Patients suggested improvements of providing a better explanation of HT, offering longer and more frequent sessions, and offering 30 minutes of protected quiet time for patients in addition to HT sessions.
The study demonstrated that use of HT in the acute setting is feasible and may benefit patients.
The study findings suggest that a simple intervention of providing protected, uninterrupted quiet time to patients can be helpful to patients. This is something that could be readily incorporated into nursing care. Findings suggest that further research in this area is feasible in acutely ill patients. Findings suggest that provision of quiet time control in further research would be a viable approach, as well as comparison to other strategies to elicit a relaxation response. Information regarding drop-out reasons suggest that more extensive explanation of HT and mechanisms of effects is warranted with use of HT.
FitzHenry, F., Wells, N., Slater, V., Dietrich, M.S., Wisawatapnimit, P., & Chakravarthy, A.B. (2013). A randomized placebo-controlled pilot study of the impact of healing touch on fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 13, 105-113.
To compare weekly healing touch to weekly sham therapy on fatigue in women receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer
Participants were randomized to receive either weekly healing touch or weekly sham therapy. Participants were blinded to group assignment. Each session was 45 minutes in length. Participants either wore a neck drape or blindfold so as not to see how the treatment was delivered.
Depression was positively correlated with fatigue measures. Anxiety was positively associated with fatigue interference. Healing touch participants reported higher levels of fatigue throughout study than control participants. The control group reported greater reduction in fatigue than did the healing touch group.
This pilot study demonstrated that the intervention was feasible. However the study did not demonstrate any benefit in reduction of fatigue in this small sample.
Healing touch is not harmful to patients, but this small study does not support its use to reduce fatigue in women receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer.
Jain, S., Pavlik, D., Distefan, J., Bruyere, R. L., Acer, J., Garcia, R., . . . Mills, P. J. (2012). Complementary medicine for fatigue and cortisol variability in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer, 118, 777–787.
To examine, within a blinded, randomized, controlled trial design, whether biofield therapy (hands-on healing) would significantly reduce fatigue in survivors with persistent cancer-related fatigue compared to mock healing and a wait-list control group.
Energy chelation (hands-on-healing with standard hand positions focusing for five to seven minutes over each body part, i.e., feet, hips, knees, bladder, stomach, hands, elbows, shoulders, heart, throat, head, and heart) for one hour, two times each week for four weeks in the intervention group; mock biofield therapy for one hour, two times each week for four weeks; and a wait-list with no specific intervention. All participants submitted saliva samples at four time points. Timing of self-reported measures of quality of life (QOL) and depression were not reported.
The study used a blinded, randomized, controlled design.
Nonspecific factors are important in responses to biofield interventions for fatigue. Belief predicts QOL responses but not fatigue or cortisol variability. Biofield therapies increase cortisol variability independent of belief and other nonspecific factors. A need exists to further examine the effects of specific processes of biofield healing on outcomes for cancer populations.
Use of a hands-on healing intervention takes time and a skill set not traditionally taught in undergraduate or graduate nursing programs. Few clinical nurses have the time or skills to practice hands-on healing as described in the study. The intervention is noninvasive and a potentially effective independent nursing intervention with a minimal side effect profile.
Post-White, J., Kinney, M. E., Savik, K., Gau, J. B., Wilcox, C., & Lerner, I. (2003). Therapeutic massage and healing touch improve symptoms in cancer. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 2, 332–344.
All participants received four weekly 45-minute sessions of therapeutic massage (MT), healing touch (HT), or presence (P) and four weekly sessions of a standard care control. Credentialed practitioners who were also registered nurses delivered MT and HT. The three interventions all included music, a centering message, and a message to focus on breathing and letting go of extraneous thoughts. The order of the conditions was randomized. MT included a written Swedish massage protocol using massage gel. For HT, the protocol developed by Healing Touch International was used, and touch and nontouch techniques were used. Energy techniques used included centering, unruffling, magnetic unruffling, full-body connection, mind clearing, chelation, and lymphatic drain to modulate the energy field. For P, participants lied on a table listening to relaxing music. An MT or HT therapist sat with the participant during the session. The purpose was to be attentive and caring but to avoid therapy or physical intervention. In the control group, symptoms and vital signs were assessed.
Patients were from two outpatient chemotherapy clinics in the Midwest.
Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
This was a randomized, two-period crossover (between one of the interventions and standard care) study.
Compared to the control group, there was no effect of presence on fatigue. When comparing individual interventions to their matched control periods, the effect of MT on fatigue was close to significance (p = 0.057). HT was found to reduce fatigue (p = 0.028).
There was no clear evidence that one intervention was superior to the other, but MT and HT seemed to be more effective than presence alone or standard care in improving fatigue.