Effectiveness Not Established

Herbal Medicine

for Fatigue

An herb is a plant or part of a plant that people take for health benefits as dietary supplements or medication. Herbal medicine may also be referred to as phytotherapy or use of botanicals. Herbal medicine interventions include a variety of substances and combinations of substances. Herbal medicine is contraindicated with some chemotherapy agents. 

Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis

Chung, V.C., Wu, X., Lu, P., Hui, E.P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, A.L., . . . Wu, J.C. (2016). Chinese herbal medicine for symptom management in cancer palliative care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, 95, e2793. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To summarize the results from randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) for managing fatigue, paresthesias, chronic pain, anorexia, edema, and constipation

TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: AMED, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Chinese Biomedical Databases, Wan Feng Digital Journals, Taiwan Periodical Literature Database
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing the effect of CHM in combination with other treatments or alone in managing cancer or treatment-related symptoms. RCTs must report the effectiveness of CHM on at least one symptom using validated scales. RCTs must include at least one CHM in the 2010 China Pharmacopeia Chinese herbal medicine index. The control groups included conventional treatment, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, placebo, or no treatment. RCTs reported information on regimens in both treatment and control groups, and the follow-up duration was clearly reported.
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not identified

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 4,767
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Two reviewers extracted data on RCT characteristics (author, year, country, eligibility criteria, diagnostic criteria); patient characteristics (CHM, control interventions, outcomes, effect size for each outcome, adverse effects). The data analysis used risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool), relative risk, weighted mean difference, 95% confidence interval, I2 statistic for level of heterogeneity, and funnel plot for publication bias.

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 14 
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 878
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 35–124 patients
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Various cancer sites

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
 
APPLICATIONS: Elder care, palliative care

Results

  • Fatigue—four RCTs. In three RCTs, no difference existed between CHM and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. In the other RCT, Fu Zheng decoction plus chemotherapy (ellence [epirubicin]/paclitaxel [taxol]) improved fatigue score compared to chemotherapy alone in breast cancer (MD: –18.62, 95% CI [–24.18, –13.16]).
  • Pain—three RCTs. CHM plus conventional treatment decreased the pain score compared to conventional treatment alone (WMD: –0.9, 95% CI [–1.69, –0.11]).
  • Constipation—seven RCTs. In six RCTs, CHM compared to conventional treatment had a similar effect. In the other RCT, Tong-Tai decoction plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone showed no difference.
  • Anorexia—two RCTs. No difference existed with CHM plus conventional treatment.

Conclusions

Combining CHM with chemotherapy may improve fatigue in patients with breast cancer. Adding CHM to conventional treatment may improve pain control. CHM alone may improve constipation.

Limitations

  • Mostly low quality/high risk of bias studies
  • High heterogeneity
  • Trials conducted and published in China

Nursing Implications

Further research needs to be performed on CHM treating cancer- and cancer treatment-related symptoms.

Print

Su, C.X., Wang, L.Q., Grant, S.J., & Liu, J.P. (2014). Chinese herbal medicine for cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 22, 567–579. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for the treatment of cancer-related fatigue (CRF)
 
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: English databases include Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase. Chinese databases include Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, SinoMed, and Wan Fang. Also, two registries were searched: The World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform and the International Clinical Trial Registry by the US National Institutes of Health.
 
KEYWORDS: The following search terms were used separately or combined: cancer-related fatigue, Chinese traditional, Chinese herbal, oriental traditional, herb, herbal medicine, and controlled trial.
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials regardless of language, blinding, or publication type. People with a clinical diagnosis of CRF with a clear description of diagnostic criteria during and after cancer treatment (including palliative care) were included. There was no age, gender, tumor type, tumor stage, or type of cancer treatment restriction. CHM was defined as single herb, Chinese patent medicine, practitioner-prescribed herbal formula, and herbal products extracted from natural herbs. There was no limitation on the number of herb uses, dosages, administrations, or durations of treatments. The control included no treatment, placebo, and conventional therapy. Also included were trials on the combined therapy of CHM with conventional therapy versus the same conventional therapy. The primary outcome was patient-reported fatigue measured by reliable and valid assessment tools. The secondary outcomes included quality of life measured by a validated instrument or tool, improvement of depression or anxiety, and adverse events related to CHM.
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Listed as inclusion criteria

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 173 records were identified after duplicates were removed.
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Appropriate methods described, from study selection, to data extraction, to assessment of risk of bias, and to data analysis using RevMan 5.2 software to quantify and compare the efficacy outcomes of CHM versus the control groups.

Sample Characteristics

FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 12 articles describing the results of 10 trials 
 
TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 751 with 448 in intervention groups and 303 in control groups
 
KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Eight articles were authored in China, and the others were authored in Korea and America. About 61% of participants were female. The mean age range was 27–71 years old. Two trials recruited CRF inpatients with spleen qi deficiency patterns. Type of cancer differed across trials with a majority focus on breast and lung cancer. 

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
 
APPLICATIONS: Palliative care

Results

CHM used alone or in combination with chemotherapy or supportive care showed significant relief in CRF compared to placebo, chemotherapy, and supportive care based on single trials. CHM plus chemotherapy or supportive care was superior to chemotherapy or supportive care in improving quality of life. Data from one trial demonstrated that CHM exerted a greater beneficial effect on relieving anxiety but no difference in alleviating depression. Seven trials reported adverse events, and no severe adverse effects were found in CHM groups.

Conclusions

The work suggests that CHM may be effective and safe in the treatment of CRF. However, the current evidence is insufficient to draw a confirmatory conclusion due to the poor methodological quality of included trials.

Limitations

Quality of methods:

  • Lack of information about randomization
  • No blinding of participants or providers
  • Few adequate allocation concealment
  • Short-term interventions (approximately four weeks)

Nursing Implications

It is necessary to conduct rigorously designed trials on potential CHM.

Print

Zhang, M., Liu, X., Li, J., He, L., Tripathy, D. (2007) Chinese medicinal herbs to treat the side-effects of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD004921. 

Purpose

To review the evidence regarding the effects of Chinese herbal medicine on side effects of chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Search Strategy

Databases searched were Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, SIGLE, and Chinese Biomedical Disk. Handsearching of key medical journals and references lists of retrieved articles was also performed.

Search keywords were Chinese medicine, plants, drugs, botanical, herbal medicine, and additional search terms related to herbal medicine as well as breast cancer treatments. A full listing of search terms was provided.

Studies were included if they included

  • Women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy as adjuvant or palliative treatment. 
  • Single and compound herbal treatments. 
  • Randomized clinical trials with chemotherapy-induced side effects.

Patients were excluded if they had other cancers as well as breast cancer (except for skin cancer).

Literature Evaluated

In total, 88 references were retrieved. The authors allocated trials to quality categories described in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook and assessed quality according to criteria from Schultz (1995); studies were categorized as having a low, moderate, or high risk of bias.

Sample Characteristics

  • The final number of studies included was seven.  
  • The sample range across studies was 48 to 120 patients (N = 541).
  • All patients had breast cancer and were receiving chemotherapy. 
  • All studies were performed on Chinese patients in a mix of settings.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Patients were undergoing multiple phases of care.

Results

Trial duration ranged from 14 to 84 days. Treatments were varied with different herbal concoctions; most included radix ginseng along with other substances. The authors did not provide the findings for all outcomes of interest. A few studies measured quality of life, and several attempted to evaluate the effect on thrombocytopenia and white blood cell volumes and types. Some studies used inappropriate statistical methods. The quality of the included trials was poor.

Conclusions

The nature of the evidence in use of Chinese herbal medicine was not sufficient to draw any conclusions.

Limitations

The study included a small number of studies with relatively small samples and poor quality.

Nursing Implications

The evidence reviewed did not provide clear implications for the incorporation of findings into practice. Further well-designed research is needed.

Print

Research Evidence Summaries

Jeong, J. S., Ryu, B. H., Kim, J. S., Park, J. W., Choi, W. C., & Yoon, S. W. (2010). Bojungikki-tang for cancer-related fatigue: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 9, 331–338.

Study Purpose

To evaluate whether Bojungikki-tang has beneficial effects on fatigue and overall quality of life in patients with cancer.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized to the experimental group or the wait-list control group. The experimental group received Bojungikki-tang for two weeks. Bojungikki-tang was administered as granules containing a mixture of 10 medicinal plants given three times daily. Patients were randomized through computer generation. Patients were recruited through newspaper and hospital advertisements.

Sample Characteristics

  • The final sample included 36 patients (37.5% male).
  • Mean age was 52.6 years. 
  • Diagnoses included breast cancer (27.5%), stomach cancer (12.5%), lung cancer (12.5%), colon cancer (12.5%), and other (35%).

Setting

Unknown

Study Design

The study was a randomized, controlled trial.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Evaluation forms included the Visual Analogue Scale of Global Fatigue, which was used as the primary outcome variable.
  • The secondary outcome was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G), the FACT-Fatigue (FACT-F), and the Trial Outcome Index–Fatigue (TOI-F).

Results

The experimental group had statistically significant improvements in VAS-F scores, as well as FACT-G, FACT-F, and TOI-F (p < 0.05) at week 2.

Conclusions

The study had a possible effect from the study drug, although p-values were on the edge of significance. The benefit shown suggests additional study is required in a larger, placebo-controlled trial.

Limitations

  • The study had no placebo in place, and the treatment time was short.
  • The plant mixture was not controlled for variability.
  • One patient experienced an increase in BUN and creatinine above the reference ranges, and other adverse effects were reported (flatulence and dyspepsia); therefore, the potential for harm needs to be considered and the risks weighed versus potential benefits if additional study is to be performed with a larger population.
  • Exclusion criteria for patients needs to be more rigorous and include consideration of antihypertensive medication and other drug interactions and baseline renal function.

Nursing Implications

Patients pursuing this treatment should be educated on the current need for additional research.

Print

Sun, D.Z., Jiao, J.P., Zhang, X., Xu, J.Y., Ye, M., Xiu, L.J., . . . Wei, P.K. (2014). Therapeutic effect of Jinlongshe Granule on quality of life of stage IV gastric cancer patients using EORTC QLQ-C30: A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2014(Nov.), 1–8. 

Study Purpose

To observe functional and symptomatic changes related to quality of life in patients with advanced gastric cancer with administration of Jinlongshe granule (JLSG, a Chinese herbal medicine)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized into a JLSG group or a placebo group. All patients received Chinese medicinal herbs prescribed individually. The intervention arm additionally received JLSG, and the other arm received a placebo three times daily. Patients were followed biweekly in clinic visits. Study measures were obtained at enrollment and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months after treatment.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 39  
  • AGE: Mean and range not determinable
  • MALES: 66.7%, FEMALES: 33.3%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: All patients had advanced gastric cancer and most had liver metastasis.
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Inclusion criteria included expected three-month survival.

Setting

  • SITE: Single-site    
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: China

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: End-of-life care
  • APPLICATIONS: Palliative care 

Study Design

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ–C30)

Results

There were statistically significant group-by-time effects for multiple symptoms including cognitive function, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and and general quality of life (p < .05). For some symptoms, differences were due to increased symptoms in the placebo group. No information regarding any adverse effects is reported. The direction of change in symptom scores is not always clear in this manuscript.

Conclusions

This study has several limitations that make it difficult to assess the potential efficacy of JLSG for symptom management.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Unintended interventions or applicable interventions not described that would influence results
  • Measurement validity/reliability questionable
  • Findings not generalizable
  • Subject withdrawals ≥ 10%  
  • Other limitations/explanation: All patients received a variety of Chinese herbal medications that were not described and were not standardized; therefore, it is not possible to determine the actual effect of the JLSG. No other interventions aimed at symptoms are described. Repeated measures of the same instrument may produce testing effect.
 

 

Nursing Implications

This study provides minimal evidence in support of a specific Chinese herbal medicine in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further well-designed studies are needed for clinically meaningful evaluation of efficacy.

Print

Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Li, P., & Wang, X.S. (2015). Ren Shen Yangrong Tang for fatigue in cancer survivors: A phase I/II open-label study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 21, 281–287. 

Study Purpose

To establish the safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of fatigue in patients with cancer who do not have anemia

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were recruited from those who visited a herbal medicine clinic. Patients were given a combination of 12 herbs, which they slowly cooked in 150 ml of water. This decoction was taken twice daily for six weeks. Study measures were obtained at baseline and after six weeks. Patients were evaluated by a traditional Chinese medicine doctor at the beginning and end of the study.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 33
  • MEDIAN AGE = 60 years (range = 41–81 years)
  • MALES: 42%, FEMALES: 58%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Varied tumor types; off treatment for at least one month
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: All had moderate to severe fatigue defined as a score of at least 4 on a 0–10 point scale; hemoglobin of at least 10 g/dl

Setting

  • SITE: Single site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient  
  • LOCATION: China

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Transition phase after active treatment

Study Design

Open-label phase I–II

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Single fatigue item scale from the Chinese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)

Results

Fatigue levels declined during the study (p = 0.024), and 64% of patients said they felt better within two weeks, and 33% felt better after three weeks. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that that a traditional Chinese herbal medicine formulation appears to be safe and may be helpful in the treatment of depression among patients with cancer.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment) 
  • Other limitations/explanation: The approach described for the evaluation of potential side effects was according to traditional Chinese medicine practice, and its general validity is not clear.

Nursing Implications

This study was limited by design and sample size, so no firm conclusions about the safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese herbal medicine can be made.

Print

Zhao, H., Zhang, Q., Zhao, L., Huang, X., Wang, J., & Kang, X. (2012). Spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum improves cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy: a pilot clinical trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 809614.

Study Purpose

To evaluate whether spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum) has beneficial effects on fatigue and overall quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing endocrine therapy.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients in the experimental group received spore powder of G. lucidum 1,000 mg three times a day for four weeks (from Beijing Great Wall Pharmaceutical Factory, batch # B20050008). This is a traditional Chinese medicine that contains polysaccharides, alkaloids, enzymes, and proteins. The control group received placebo for four weeks. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and the end of four weeks. 

Sample Characteristics

  • The total sample was comprised of 48 women, with 25 patients in the experiemental group and 23 in the control group.  
  • Median age was 51.3 years (standard deviation [SD] = 9.8) in the experiemental group and 53.2 years (SD = 8.7) in the control group (p > 0.1).
  • Patients were stage I to IIIA. 
  • Multimodal treatment included surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy for all patients. 
  • Duration of endocrine therapy varied from more than six months to up to five years. 
  • No statistically significant differences existed between the groups.
  • Patients received endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
     

Setting

The study was conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University in Harbin, China, from June 2009 to September 2010.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
  • The study has clinical applicability for patients undergoing endocrine therapy.
     

Study Design

The study was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Fatigue (FACT-F)
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
  • Biological Markers of Fatigue:  tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)
  • Safety and toxicity tests, such as a renal function test, liver function test, and the Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 scale
  • Fatigue was measured with a single-item numeric rating scale with possible values from 0 (a great deal of fatigue) to 10 (no fatigue).
  • Energy was measured with a single item, “How much energy have you had during the past 4 weeks?,” with possible values from 0 (no energy at all) to 10 (a great deal of energy).
     

Results

No serious adverse effects occurred. No significant changes occurred in the renal and liver function tests. Fatigue scores were improved in the experimental group at four weeks (p < 0.01), but no significant improvement occurred in the control group. At four weeks, anxiety and depression scores had improved significantly from baseline in the experimental group. No significant improvement occurred over time in the control group.

Conclusions

The pilot suggested that spore powder G. lucidum may have beneficial effects on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing endocrine therapy with no significant safety concerns.

Limitations

  • The study had a small sample size, with less than 100 patients.
  • Nonspecific aspects of the intervention (social support) may influence the study. 
  • Patients were healthy (e.g., no other comorbid conditions).
  • No blinding was performed.
     

Nursing Implications

Additional research should be conducted in a larger randomized, controlled trial.

Print