Giving antibiotics prior to surgery, at the time of anesthesia induction, has been identified as an intervention for the prevention of surgical site infections, and general use of antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended in guidelines for some types of surgery. In addition, oral antibiotics prior to colon surgery in patients with cancer have been examined for effect on postoperative infection rates.
Gulluoglu, B.M., Guler, S.A., Ugurlu, M.U., & Culha, G. (2013). Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic administration for breast cancer surgery in overweight or obese patients: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 257, 37–43.
To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics on prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) and the cost of this effectiveness, as compared to a control without prophylaxis antibiotics in early breast cancer surgery in overweight or obese women
Women randomly were assigned to receive IV infusion of 1 g ampicillin-sulbactam at the start of anesthesia or no prophylactic antibiotics. Patients were followed for 30 days. Outcomes also were compared to a group of women who had a body mass index (BMI) lower than 25 and who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis.
Nine SSIs developed in the prophylaxis group, versus 25 in the control group (p = .002). Patients were matched well according to age, BMI, history of smoking, ASA class, interval between tissue biopsy and randomization, clinical cancer stage, type of breast and axillary surgery, operation time, hospital stay, and post-operation complications. All SSIs were discovered within post-operation week one after discharge, except one. The control group had significantly more SSIs compared to those in the normal-weight comparison group (p = .0007) and higher SSI treatment costs than the prophylaxis group (p = .007). Patients in the control group had more open surgical biopsies than those in the prophylaxis group (p = .004)
The administration of antibiotics at the time of induction for surgery was associated with reduced incidence of SSI among obese women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Costs were lower among those receiving prophylactic antibiotics.
Reminding physicians to prescribe pre-operation antibiotics is important. Administration of a dose of IV antibiotics at the time of induction is a current U.S. standard of care and recommendation for SSI prevention. Careful hand washing and clean dressing changes are imperative. These findings also point to the increased risk of infection associated with obesity. Nurses can educate patients regarding risks associated with obesity and assist patients with weight management.
Johansen, N.J., & Hahn, C.H. (2015). Prophylactic antibiotics at the time of tracheotomy lowers the incidence of pneumonia. Danish Medical Journal, 62, A5107. Retrieved from http://www.danmedj.dk/portal/page/portal/danmedj.dk/dmj_forside/PAST_IS…
To estimate the prevalence of pneumonia after tracheotomy in patients with head and neck cancer, and to evaluate the effect of prophylactic antibiotics
Data on patients who underwent tracheotomy were obtained from health records, and patients were grouped according to whether they had been given prophylactic antibiotics. In all cases, tracheotomy was the primary operation. The comparison of ventilator-associated pneumonia was analyzed.
Pneumonia was defined as the clinical suspicion of pneumonia or the postoperative administration of antibiotics.
More patients who did not receive prophylaxis received antibiotics postoperatively (p = 0.04). The hospital stays of those given prophylactic antibiotics were seven days shorter (p < 0.01).
Prophylactic antibiotic administration for patients undergoing tracheotomy may reduce the risk of postprocedure ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Prophylactic antibiotic use in patients undergoing surgical procedures has been shown to reduce postoperative infections. The findings from this study add to that body of evidence, suggesting that this approach prior to tracheostomy provides a similar benefit in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Lee, C., You, D., Jeong, I.G., Hong, J.H., Choo, M.S., Ahn, H., . . . Kim, C.S. (2015). Antibiotic prophylaxis with intravenous ceftriaxone and fluoroquinolone reduces infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy. Korean Journal of Urology, 56, 466–472.
To compare the effectiveness of standard fluoroquinolone prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone plus ceftriaxone in the prevention of infection post prostate biopsy
Patients received one of three prophylaxis regimens: (a) 500 mg fluoroquinolone by mouth twice a day for three days, (b) 500 mg fluoroquinolone by mouth twice a day for three days plus 2 g IV ceftriaxone once before biopsy, or (c) 500 mg fluoroquinolone by mouth twice a day for more than seven days plus 2 grams IV ceftriaxone once before biopsy.
Infection post prostate biopsy was defined as any of the following: a temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius, a white blood cell count greater than 12,000/mm3, a urinary tract infection, or acute prostatitis.
A significant decrease of infections was observed post prostate biopsy for patients that received prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone plus ceftriaxone (p < 0.001). One percent of patients who received fluoroquinolone prophylaxis had infectious complications compared to 0.3% of patients who received fluoroquinolone plus ceftriaxone. Patients who received fluoroquinolone prophylaxis for more than seven days had no added reduction of infection compared to patients who received fluoroquinolone prophylaxis for three days.
Infection prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone alone after prostate biopsy may be insufficient because of increasing resistance among pathogens, including Escherichia coli. The addition of 2 grams IV ceftriaxone before prostate biopsy was correlated with a significant reduction in infectious complications at one hospital in South Korea.
Adequate patient education on potential infectious complications is necessary post prostate biopsies. To tailor infection prophylaxis, nurses should consider assessing for individual risk factors for infection (e.g., diabetes, history of organ transplant, etc.) and collect rectal swabs to identify quinolone-resistance organisms.
Sadahiro, S., Suzuki, T., Tanaka, A., Okada, K., Kamata, H., Ozaki, T., & Koga, Y. (2014). Comparison between oral antibiotics and probiotics as bowel preparation for elective colon cancer surgery to prevent infection: Prospective randomized trial. Surgery, 155, 493–503.
To determine comparative effectiveness of oral antibiotics and probiotics as bowel preparation in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI)
Patients were randomized to one of three groups. The probiotic group took bifidobacteria tablets orally after each meal three times daily for seven days preoperatively, and postoperatively for 10 days. The oral antibiotic group took 0.5 g kanamycin sulfate and 0.5 g metronidazole orally three times on the day before surgery. The control group did not receive any bowel preparation beyond standard care. All patients underwent mechanical bowel prep with sodium picosulfate two days before surgery and polyethylene glycol in the morning of the day of surgery. All patients received a single preoperative 1 g dose of flomoxef IV one hour prior to incision. The same procedures for surgical site disinfection, intraperitoneal irrigation, and suture closures were done. Operative wounds were assessed daily during the hospital stay and in an outpatient clinic four weeks after surgery.
Rates of postoperative infections, including incisional infections, organ/space SSIs, and remote infections, were 24% in the probiotic group, 11.1% in the oral antibiotic group, and 25% in the control group. Group comparisons showed that the difference in infection rate was significantly lower in the oral antibiotic group than in either other group (p < .03). Incidence of incisional SSI was lower in the oral antibiotic group (p = .014). The oral antibiotic group also had a significantly lower rate of leakage (p = .004). SSI-causing pathogens were analyzed in all patients, and most of the bacteria detected were not covered by the spectrum of flomoxef. No significant differences were observed in CD toxin detection between groups.
Findings suggest that bowel preparation with oral antibiotics is helpful in preventing postoperative infections in patients with colon cancer undergoing elective colon surgery. No benefit was shown with the use of preoperative probiotics.
Findings show that rates of postoperative infections among patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer can be reduced by the addition of oral antibiotics as part of bowel preparation. Probiotic use was not effective. Nurses can advocate for consideration of use of preoperative oral antibiotics as examined in this study and advocate for further research to confirm these findings. CD risk was not shown to be different across groups in this study, but this risk remains a consideration, particularly if oral antibiotic use is prolonged.