Supportive care involves the provision of emotional support informally or through structured interventions. Support interventions include activities such as general counseling related to emotional and other issues, active listening, and presence. Supportive interventions may be provided by healthcare professionals or may be structured as peer group support. Interventions can be one-on-one individualized sessions, support group sessions, or specific interventions with caregivers, families, etc. Support interventions may be provided via telephone, physical presence, or online groups that may be either referereed by a professional or unrefereed. Expressive writing for emotional disclosure can be seen as a specific type of supportive intervention; however, it is not grouped in the intervention of supportive care. Expressive writing, as a very specific approach, is evaluated in ONS PEP resources as its own type of intervention. Supportive care/support interventions have been evaluated in patients with cancer for anxiety, caregiver strain and burden, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and depression
Griffiths, K.M., Calear, A.L., & Banfield, M. (2009). Systematic review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and depression (1): Do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(3), e40-e40.
To evaluate the evidence concerning the efficacy of Internet support groups (ISGs) in reducing symptoms of depression
There is a need for high-quality research regarding the effect of ISGs on symptoms of depression.
This systematic review included data from studies available as of July 2007. Internet use and and social networking have increased since 2007—a fact that could alter the findings about the use and effect of ISGs. More research in this area is needed.
This review points to the need for high-quality research in this area. Theoretically, ISGs could be important for users who are isolated or unable to access face-to-face services readily; therefore, further research should be done.
Moore, T.H., King, A.J., Evans, M., Sharp, D., Persad, R., & Huntley, A.L. (2015). Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: Why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials. Cancer Medicine, 4, 1240–1251.
STUDY PURPOSE: To examine the effect of a variety of supportive care measures on quality of life (QOL), depression, anxiety, coping skills, and self-efficacy among men with prostate cancer in various states of care. (Note: Many more outcomes were reported among studies, but the four above were the most frequent.)
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
APPLICATIONS: Elder care
Most trials reported no effect of supportive care measures on the stated outcome variables. The findings indicated appropriate interventions and outcomes measures, but small samples with insufficient power contributed to lack of evidence for improvements. Recommendations included resources to support the design, conduct of trials, and reporting (CONSORT guidelines) improvements. Also included were recommendations to diversify sampling across sociodemographic profiles to include unpartnered men who may be less likely to have a social support network, address all stages of care, provide clear descriptions of usual care and control group activities, and use reliable and valid outcome measures.
The value of this systematic review is that supportive care probably works, but the evidence is lacking because of inconsistencies in study design and reporting. Clear, perhaps standardized, descriptions of the broad variety of interventions called \"supportive care\" are needed. Comparative information was not available across more than two to six trials of a particular intervention. The effect of supportive care in patients with prostate cancer can be examined by creating studies that have strong design quality and methodology. The authors’ provide important recommendations for study areas to be addressed so that results are comparable. One finding is seldom sufficient to change or influence practice.
Williams, S., & Dale, J. (2006). The effectiveness of treatment for depression/depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: A systematic review. British Journal of Cancer, 94(3), 372–390.
To review systematically the efficacy of psychotherapeutic and antidepressant interventions for cancer patients with depression or symptoms of depression
Some evidence suggests that antidepressants are effective in reducing symptoms of depression in patients with cancer, and overall tolerability of antidepressants appeared to be good. Cognitive behavioral therapy was effective in reducing symptoms of depression. An intervention that might be effective is the social-support group.
Findings suggest that antidepressants, cognitive behavioral interventions, and support group interventions can have a positive impact on symptoms of depression in patients with cancer. Variability in findings suggests that these interventions are likely to be of most benefit to patients who actually have clinically defined symptoms of depression. There is a need for further research of the efficacy of antidepressants in the patients studied. Studies in this area should include data regarding use of any cointerventions for depression.
Björneklett, H.G., Rosenblad, A., Lindemalm, C., Ojutkangas, M.L., Letocha, H., Strang, P., & Bergkvist, L. (2013). Long-term follow-up of a randomized study of support group intervention in women with primary breast cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74(4), 346–353.
Long-term follow-up to evaluate quality of life after support group intervention in a randomized group of women with primary breast cancer presenting for postoperative radiotherapy.
The current study is a long-term follow-up 5–9 years after randomization into groups. The intervention and control groups were stratified by chemotherapy or nonchemotherapy treatment. The intervention was a one-week support group with four days of follow-up two months postintervention during residential care at the Foundation of Lustgården Mälardalen. The intervention involved lectures and group discussions about the etiology of cancer, risk factors, treatment, physical and psychological effects, and coping strategies. Patients engaged in physical exercise, relaxation, Qigong, and nonverbal communication exercises, as well as art and dance therapy. All participants completed questionnaires at baseline and follow-up questionnaires at 2, 6, and 12 months postintervention. The control group participated only in routine follow-up at the Department of Oncology or the Department of Surgery.
Fatigue symptoms improved over time, which was a significant finding in the intervention and control groups. Being upset about hair loss improved over time in the intervention group. High anxiety scores improved over time and were not significantly different between the two groups in long-term follow-up. Depression scores were high at follow-up for seven women in each group, and no significant difference was found at baseline and postintervention, adjusting for covariates. Neither group showed improvement between the 12-month follow-up and long-term follow-up.
Effects of support group intervention may provide a sense of security that can fade over time, reversing improvements in anxiety and depression. Treatment-related fatigue may improve over time. Significant improvement was found in cognitive function, body image, and future perspective, but no significant effect was found on levels of anxiety and depression.
Women who have received chemotherapy have greater symptom severity and may benefit more on global health and cognitive function fatigue, when compared to women who have not received chemotherapy. Additional research is needed to evaluate the influence of exercise and psychosocial support interventions, according to patient needs for content, duration, and an assessment of spiritual well-being using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT).
Girgis, A., Breen, S., Stacey, F., & Lecathelinais, C. (2009). Impact of two supportive care interventions on anxiety, depression, quality of life, and unmet needs in patients with nonlocalized breast and colorectal cancers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 6180–6190.
To determine if, compared to individuals receiving usual care, participants in intervention groups would report lower levels of anxiety, depression, and unmet supportive care needs along with improved physical and emotional functioning
Parallel-group, prospective randomized controlled trial
Authors noted no significant intervention effect in this study, with the exception of improved physical functioning at six months for the TCW group.
Nurses should continue to explore ways to reach patients, at the time of diagnosis and beyond treatment, that can assist patients in psychosocial functioning. The field needs tools to make this easier; nurses need ways to implement care efficiently. The study did not show telephonic intervention to be effective.
Gotay, C.C., Moinpour, C.M., Unger, J.M., Jiang, C.S., Coleman, D., Martino, S. . . . Albain, K.S. (2007). Impact of a peer-delivered telephone intervention for women experiencing a breast cancer recurrence. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25 (15), 2093–2098.
To evaluate the effects a brief telephone intervention on women experiencing a recurrence of breast cancer
Women were randomly assigned to either a telephone-intervention group (TG) or a control group (CG). TG received 4–8 counseling/information sessions by telephone at weekly intervals. Session content reflected primary patient concerns and common domains from a quality-of-life (QOL) model. After the first session, patients received an information packet. The packet consisted primarily of National Cancer Institute pamphlets. Counselors were breast cancer recurrence survivors at least one year postrecurrence. Assessments were completed at baseline, three months, and six months.
The study was conducted by SWOG (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group)—an organization, supported by the National Cancer Institute, that conducts clinical trials relating to cancer in adults.
Multisite
Secondary-outcome assessments:
Support services utilized and satisfaction with the telephone intervention were requested.
The telephone intervention was feasible and well accepted, but authors noted no benefits associated with the intervention, in regard to either emotional well-being or depressive symptoms. Patient distress started and remained very high in this sample. Statistically significant was the fact that more CG patients progressed during the six months of the study than did members of the TG group.
This is a well-designed RCT with adequate sample size; however, the study’s generalizability is unclear, given that the patients came from multiple institutions across the United States. The catchment cannot be precisely described, and characteristics of refusing patients were not reported. This sample included high levels of psychological and disease-related disability, and telephone calls from a nonprofessional may not have been an appropriate means of modifying patient distress. The study presents no significant findings.
Heiney, S.P., Reavis, K., Tavakoli, A.S., Adams, S.A., Hayne, P.D., & Weinrich, S.P. (2015). The impact of STORY on depression and fatigue in African-American women with breast cancer. Journal of National Black Nurses' Association, 26, 1–7.
To test the hypothesis that depression and fatigue would be decreased more in the Sisters Tell Others and Revive Yourself (STORY) intervention group than in controls
The STORY intervention was a therapeutic activity delivered to a group via teleconference, using information and storytelling to increase social connections among African American women with breast cancer. A series to teleconferences was facilitated by two social workers with groups of 10 patients. The series was done weekly for eight weeks, and every other week for two weeks. Participants received small stipends during the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the STORY intervention or usual care. This particular report used secondary analysis to determine the impact of this intervention on depression and fatigue.
There was no significant difference in fatigue or depression between study groups.
The psychoeducational intervention delivered via teleconference as tested here did not demonstrate an effect on fatigue or depression.
The psychoeducational and supportive intervention tested did not show an effect on depression or fatigue. This report does provide information regarding using a teleconference approach to provision of a group intervention, which might be applicable in a number of situations to facilitate patient involvement in this type of activity. Further research regarding the most effective methods of delivery of educational and supportive interventions is needed.
Kao, C.Y., Hu, W.Y., Chiu, T.Y., & Chen, C.Y. (2014). Effects of the hospital-based palliative care team on the care for cancer patients: An evaluation study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(2), 226-235.
To evaluate the effects of the hospital-based palliative care team on care for patients with cancer
The hospital-based palliative care team visited intervention patients “regularly” during the one-week study period. Team members including physicians, nurses, chaplains, and social workers provided advice about medications and taught patients and families skills to relieve physical symptoms, provided emotional support, and assisted with truth-telling and preparation for death. Data were collected at baseline and one week later.
Quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design
No significant difference was seen in anxiety and depression between the control and intervention groups after one week of palliative care. Improvement was seen in edema, fatigue, dry mouth, and abdominal distention.
Nurse interventions improved symptom management for the intervention group; however, in the short timeframe of this study emotional disturbances were not affected. Cultural implications are important here; death is a taboo topic in Chinese culture, and patients' understanding of their terminal disease is low and rarely discussed.
Palliative care consultation may benefit many symptoms of patients with cancer, but without clear interventions for depression and in this short timespan, little effect is apparent.
Klemm, P. (2012). Effects of online support group format (moderated vs peer-led) on depressive symptoms and extent of participation in women with breast cancer. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN, 30(1), 9–18.
To evaluate the effects, in women with breast cancer, of moderated and peer-led online support group format on symptoms of depression and degree of participation
Investigator distributed recruitment material via postal mail, online, or through nonprofit organizations or the media. Interested women contacted the investigator after receiving or seeing recruitment material. Participants were placed into a moderated or peer-led group, in groups of 15 according to time of recruitment. All online support was accessed via a university-owned web page devoted to the work. Participants could not access groups to which they were not assigned. Moderators were master's-prepared social workers with experience with online and telephone help for people with cancer and their caregivers. Investigators obtained study measures at baseline and at 6, 12, and 16 weeks. The group was maintained for 12 weeks.
Longitudinal two-group design
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD)
At the end of the study, findings revealed no significant effects, on symptoms of depression, in regard to group, time, or time by group format. CESD scores in peer-led groups declined slightly at all study time points but were not significantly different from the scores of moderator-led groups. In both groups, symptoms of depression were mild. More messages were posted and read in moderated groups than in peer-led groups.
The study showed no effect of peer- or moderator-led online support groups on symptoms of depression in women with breast cancer.
This study does not provide strong support for the effectiveness of either peer-led or moderated online support groups on symptoms of depression; however, at baseline the depression scores of most participants were fairly low, and study groups were not balanced on baseline depression symptoms. It is not clear if such support efforts are beneficial to individuals who do not have a high level of depression symptoms. This finding could have influenced study results. Research in this area should stratify samples on the basis of the level of symptoms at baseline.
Kroenke, K., Theobald, D., Wu, J., Norton, K., Morrison, G., Carpenter, J., & Tu, W. (2010). Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA, 304, 163–171.
To determine whether centralized telephone-based care management and automated symptom monitoring can reduce depression and pain in patients with cancer
Participants in the intervention group received centralized telecare management, conducted by a nurse-physician specialist team, and automated home-based symptom monitoring by means of interactive voice recording or Internet. The control group received usual care. Data were collected at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12.
Random controlled trial with double blinding, with stratified randomization by symptom type (pain only, depression only, or both pain and depression)
The intervention may be effective at reducing pain and depression. The intervention proved to be a feasible care approach for geographically dispersed urban and rural oncology practices.
Lack of control over type of cancer treatment and over the time lapse since treatment might have affected study findings.
Cost will be involved in training the care manager and in hiring trained personnel. The cost-effectiveness of the collaborative care model needs to be further examined. Studies show mixed results regarding effect of by-telephone patient management; further work in this area is warranted. Use of technology may be a viable approach to ongoing patient support.
Musarezaie, A., Moeini, M., Taleghani, F., & Mehrabi, T. (2014). Does spiritual care program affect levels of depression in patients with Leukemia? A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 3, 96-9531.139678.
To determine the effects of a spiritual care and support program on levels of depression in patients with leukemia
Patients in intensive care randomly were assigned to the spiritual care or control groups. Patients in the control group could receive the spiritual care program after the completion of the study. The program encouraged a supportive presence through the expression of feelings, needs, and concerns, and provided education regarding disease, treatment, and supportive touch. To support religious rituals, patients were provided a prayer rug, rosary, and a veil for women. Participants also had access to an MP3 player and earphones to listen to prayers and passages from the Quran. Readings of prayers and the Quran at the bedside were implemented by a clergyman. Study measures were obtained at baseline and on day 3 by an individual blinded to study group assignment.
Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
The mean postintervention score in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (p < .001), and the change in depression scores in the intervention group was marginally significant (p < .07). Baseline data and changes for both groups were not provided.
This intervention, which included support and psychoeducational components along with spiritual support, was associated with reduced depression scores.
Supportive and psychoeducational interventions that include a component of spiritual support may be beneficial for hospitalized patients with leukemia. The provision of holistic supportive care is a principle of nursing care. These findings provide marginal support for the efficacy of these interventions during short-term hospitalization. There were several study limitations.
Scheier, M.F., Helgeson, V.S., Schulz, R., Colvin, S., Berga, S., Bridges, M.W., . . . Pappert, W.S. (2005). Interventions to enhance physical and psychological functioning among younger women who are ending nonhormonal adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 4298–4311.
This study was designed to evaluate interventions targeted to occur at the point when treatment is ending—a time when distress and concerns are known to increase. It also targets younger women; as some studies report, younger women are at greater risk for psychological distress and face different challenges than older women do.
Women with breast cancer were assigned to a three-arm clinical trial. In the two active arms, the women received either an educational intervention, which provided information about their disease and treatment, or information about nutrition, featuring a low-fat, high-fruit-and-vegetable-eating pattern. Both active treatment arms received four group sessions, meeting once per month for four consecutive months. Sessions were led by professionals, and interactions between participants were kept to a minimum. The control arm was standard medical care. Random assignment assessments occurred at baseline, then 4 months, and 13 months later (corresponding to immediate post-intervention and nine months post-intervention.)
At the 13th-month assessment, participants in the nutrition arm reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms, and in the education arm, marginally fewer depressive symptoms were reported than in the control arm. The difference between the two active treatment arms was not significant. The mediating factors also were identified as contributing by enhancing self-efficacy expectations, reducing some concerns regarding morbidity and mortality, lessening intrusive thoughts about illness, and buffering self-concept perceptions.
Steinhauser, K.E., Alexander, S., Olsen, M.K., Stechuchak, K.M., Zervakis, J., Ammarell, N., . . . Tulsky, J.A. (2017). Addressing patient emotional and existential needs during serious illness: Results of the Outlook randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 54, 898–908.
To evaluate outlook, an intervention to assist patients address emotional and existential needs, in people living with advanced disease yet not in the final months of life. If improvements were demonstrated, it could improve understanding of intervention in early versus late palliative care contexts.
Three-arm randomized controlled trial testing the effect of Outlook, with an attention control (RM) and a true control (usual care UC). Baseline interview completed in person or on the phone, then randomized 1:1:1. Participants assigned to Outlook were interviewed in person three times during a one-month period after the baseline interview. Session 1 was life review; session 2 was issues of forgiveness, regret, things left unsaid, or undone; and session 3 was heritage and legacy. Interviews were a week apart and lasted 45 minutes. Participants assigned to RM met with the interventionist in person three times during a one-month period and listed to a relaxation CD for 40 minutes. UC participants were not contacted. Interventionists were clinical social workers trained in delivering standardized interventions following a manualized script. Sessions were audio recorded.
Three-arm randomized controlled trial testing the effect of Outlook compared with an attention control (relaxation meditation [RM]) and a true control (usual care [UC]) on patient QOL, functional status, and emotional well-being.
Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
The study compared change in primary and secondary outcomes over time between outlook and both the RM and UC groups. Outlook participants had higher improvements in mean preparation (p = 0.02) and mean completion (p = 0.04) at five week follow-up compared with UC. The differences did not persist for the seven week follow-up. Compared to the RM group, Outlook participants did not have a significant difference in preparation and completion at either follow up. Outlook social well-being was improved over RM at the seven-week follow-up. Outlook did not show significant difference over time in QOL, anxiety, or depression. Qualitative interview participants (15%) described Outlook at helpful. Participants valued the opportunity to review life memories as a source of strength and to identify unresolved issues.
Outlook did not demonstrate sustained improvements in preparation, anxiety, or depression and overall QOL compared to RM in adults with advanced illness who were not hospice eligible. Outlook as an intervention was positive for patient quality of life in reviewing memories as a source of strength, and releasing unresolved emotions and concerns.
The structured Outlook intervention which assists patients to review and resolve important life issues and concerns is valuable for patients with terminal illness, including patients with cancer. Nurses can assess patients for distress and ensure that opportunities and referrals with support resources are explored. This would be relevant to the hospice setting.
Vos, P.J., Visser, A.P., Garssen, B., Duivenvoorden, H.J., & de Haes, H. (2007). Effectiveness of group psychotherapy compared to social support groups in patients with primary, non-metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 25(4), 37–60.
To compare the effectiveness, for women with a primary breast cancer, of experiential-existential group psychotherapy (incorporating cancer into one’s life) with that of a social-support group in regard to psychosocial adjustment (including psychological, psychosexual, and social adjustment); to examine the effect of age, type of surgery, and stage of disease on psychosocial adjustment indicators at the end of the intervention and at one year after the intervention
After the participants provided informed consent, they were randomly assigned to treatment groups: one group that received group psychotherapy; one group, social support. Data were collected at baseline (T0), then the intervention groups were conducted for three months. Data were collected after the intervention (T1) and at 12 months after completion of the intervention (T2). The interventions consisted of 12 weekly sessions of 2.5 hours each, including a 30-minute coffee break. The two follow-up sessions were at one and two months after the close of the intervention groups. The two follow-up sessions involved only 6–10 women and were conducted by trained leaders. Two trained therapists led the experiential-existential groups, and two trained leaders led the social-support groups. The study method required at least one of the therapists or leaders in each group to be a woman. Each group psychotherapy session, except the 1st and the 12th, followed a specific structure: opening, discussion of a specific topic, choosing the topic for the following week, and closing the session. The first session focused on introduction of the procedures and getting to know others. The 12th session was used to evaluate the group, to discuss what was learned or missed, to suggest improvements, and to say goodbye. Participants were allowed to choose the topics of the two follow-up sessions.
A time-series randomized clinical trial
In regard to distress, vitality, sexual functioning, and social intentions, the psychotherapy group did not benefit more from the intervention than did the social-support group. At the end of the sessions, participants reported positive changes in regard to body image and recreation; the disease had less impact on recreational activities than on body image. Type of surgery was related to body image: Participants who had had breast-conserving surgery reported a more positive body image than did participants who had not.
Psychologically well-adjusted women diagnosed with breast cancer do not benefit from the interventions described in this study: experiential-existential group psychotherapy and social-support groups.
Results do not make clear whether support groups or group psychotherapy are beneficial for women who do not have substantial distress. In clinical practice, screening patients for psychological distress makes sense, as does providing therapy and the specified support interventions only to those patients who have distress and who may benefit.
Weber, B.A., Roberts, L., Yarandi, H., Mills, T.L., Chumbler, N.R., & Wajsman, Z. (2007). The impact of dyadic social support on self-efficacy and depression after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Aging & Health, 19(4), 630–645.
To assess the effect of one-on-one peer support on enhancing self-efficacy and decreasing depression in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
A core group of support partners who were prostate cancer survivors were recruited for the study protocol and trained to recognize signs and symptoms of clinical depression, communicate with active listening skills, and record reactions of study participants in a weekly log. One-on-one sessions were held in a private location, without involvement of patient's significant others. Men were randomly assigned to the support intervention or usual care. Support sessions were to be done eight times over an eight-week period. Data were collected at baseline and at four and eight weeks.
Randomized controlled trial
The number of sessions was 1–8. Those in the treatment group had significantly higher self-efficacy (p = 0.005) and lower depression (p = 0.032) at eight weeks. All patients had low depression scores at baseline. There was an 8.6% drop-out rate.
The support intervention provided by trained prostate cancer survivors demonstrated a positive effect on patient self-efficacy and depression scores.
Study findings show a positive effect of one-on-one support among men with prostate cancer when support was provided by prostate cancer survivors who had the same treatments, side effects, and experiences. It has been suggested that men do not tend to participate in support groups, being less inclined to share concerns in a support-group setting. One-on-one pairing, one patient with one individual who has had similar experiences and adjusted well, may be very beneficial to patients.
White, V.M., Macvean, M.L., Grogan, S., D'Este, C., Akkerman, D., Ieropoli, S., . . . Sanson-Fisher, R. (2012). Can a tailored telephone intervention delivered by volunteers reduce the supportive care needs, anxiety and depression of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 1053–1062.
To assess the effectiveness of a volunteer-delivered, tailored telephone-based intervention in reducing unmet supportive care needs and elevated levels of anxiety and depression among people with colorectal cancer
The intervention utilized a checklist of unmet needs that patients with colorectal cancer completed. Specially trained volunteers then followed up with patients, by means of telephone consultation, to review needs and devise an action plan.
Transition phase of care
Randomized controlled trial
This study suggests that a volunteer-delivered, telephone-based intervention is plausible and acceptable to patients with cancer and that the intervention was effective in getting patients to use available services. This approach was associated with reduced anxiety over time, but did not have an impact on depression or prevalence of unmet needs as identified by the patients.
Tailoring support and interventions to only those patients with unmet needs might be a better allocation of resources while producing significant results.