Skip to main content

Donnelly, J.P., Bellm, L.A., Epstien, J.B., Sonis, S.T., & Symonds, R.P. (2003). Antimicrobial therapy to prevent or treat oral mucositis. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 3, 405–412.

Search Strategy

Database searched was Medline (1964–June 2002).

Keywords searched were anti-infective agents and mucositis or stomatitis

Articles were included in the review if they were written in English language and described human clinical trials.

Studies were excluded if they involved meta-analyses.

Study quality was scored on 0–5 scale (with 5 being the highest) depending on previously established criteria. Five studies scored 4, and eight scored 0. The mean score was 2.1, indicating overall lack of quality in published material.

Literature Evaluated

Thirty-one eligible studies were identified. Twenty-eight of the studies used some kind of control, usually a placebo mouthwash or sterile water. Seventeen studies assessed chlorehexidine, and five studies investigated preparations containing polymyxin, tobramycin, and amphotericin; others included povidone-iodine; fluconazole; clindamycin; bacitracin, clotrimazole, and gentamicin; tetrachlorodecaoxide, ciprofloxacin, or ampicillin with clortrimazole; sucralfate versus sucralfate; ofloxacin, miconazole, tetracain, and guaiazulene; triacetin versus topical anesthetics or system icanalgesics; tetracycline, nystatin; hydrocortisone; and diphenhydramine versus placebo. The chlorexidine studies also included the following agents: benzydamine, nystatin, povidone-iodine, salt and soda, magic mouthwash, and clotrimazole.

The scale used was reported in 22 studies. Scales were World Health Organization (n = 4), Oral Assessment Guide (n = 7), 0–5 scale (n = 1), and 0–4 scale (n = 10).

Sample Characteristics

The number of patients across studies ranged from 12–275.

Results

  • Of the 30 studies reporting a measurable outcome, 14 reported a benefit, 15 reported no benefit, and 1 reported an unfavorable outcome.
  • Of the 17 studies involving chlorhexidine, one had an unfavorable outcome (i.e., increased oral mucositis and discomfort), 11 showed no benefit, and 7 groups showed some benefit.
  • Four of the studies using other agents reported a benefit, four reported no benefit, and one reported only microbiologic data.

Conclusions

No clear pattern emerged regarding the benefit of antimicrobial use to manage oral mucositis.

Nursing Implications

Results draw attention to the multifaceted pathophysiology of oral mucositis, which presents a challenge for effective measures for prevention and treatment of mucositis.

Print

Dong, X., Huang, J., Cao, R., & Liu, L. (2010). Palonosetron for prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Medical Oncology, 28, 1425–1429.

Study Purpose

To verify the activity and safety of palonosetron in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized to either a single dose of 0.25 mg IV bolus palonosetron or 8 mg IV ondansetron on day one. Only dexamethasone was permitted as rescue medication. Doctors recorded daily episodes of vomiting and nausea and use of rescue medication. Patients were followed for seven days.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study consisted of 89 participants.
  • The mean age was 53 years (range 29–76).
  • The sample was 32% female and 57% male.
  • Patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, stages II–IV, and were receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).
  • Of the palonosetron group and the ondansetron group, 68% and 64%, respectively, had previously received chemotherapy. More than 50% of these patients had experienced chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Setting

The study was conducted at a single site in China.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

All patients were in active treatment.

Study Design

This was a randomized, controlled study.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

The following measurement were used.

  • Daily episodes of vomiting (number, duration, time)
  • Nausea intensity based on a 0–3 Likert-type scale
  • Use of rescue medication
  • Complete response (CR): no emesis, no rescue medication
  • Complete control (CC): no emesis, no rescue medication, no more than mild nausea
  • Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0 (CTAE 3.0)

Results

  • The proportion of patients with CR and CC in the delayed phase was significantly higher in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron group (p < 0.02).
  • The proportion of patients with no nausea was greater in the palonosetron group (23%) than in the ondansetron group (12%) in the delayed phase (p = 0.013).
  • The proportion of patients with no emesis was greater in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron group in the delayed phase (p < 0.000).
  • In the palonosetron group, the proportion of patients with no emetic episodes throughout the study was 61.4%, compared to 31.1% in the ondansetron group (p = 0.004).
  • The adverse events profiles of palonosetron and ondansetron group were not statistically different. Constipation and headache were the most frequent adverse events.

Conclusions

Palonosetron could be an effective and safe drug for the prevention of CINV associated with HEC. Palonosetron may be particularly helpful in prevention of CINV in the delayed period.

Limitations

  • A small sample of fewer than 100 participants was used.
  • Appropriate emetic control was not employed because the chemotherapy regimen was HEC and aprepitant and dexamethasone are recommended antiemetics for the control of CINV with HEC.

Nursing Implications

In countries where aprepitant is not widely available, palonosetron could be an option for 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for CINV with HEC among patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Print

Donald, G.K., Tobin, I., & Stringer, J. (2011). Evaluation of acupuncture in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Acupuncture in Medicine, 29, 230–233.

Study Purpose

The aim of the study is to explore the potential effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Once a patient's clinical condition had been assessed as suitable for acupuncture, he or she was initially offered a course of six weekly treatments. Patient suitability to receive acupuncture was assessed prior to each session. All acupuncturists were qualified nurses trained in the Western medical approach (WMA) and needles remained in situ for 30–45 minutes. Acupuncturists selected points to be used based on patient presentation at each session. Treatments took place either in an outpatient clinic, chemotherapy day case ward, or a drop-in clinic based in a physiotherapy gym. An evaluation form was completed by the therapist prior to the first session and on completion of the final (sixth) session. A different member of the team completed this final evaluation to minimize bias.

Sample Characteristics

  • A total of 17 participants were enrolled.
  • The mean age was 51.83 years (SD = 12.97), and women (53%) slightly outnumbered men (47%).
  • Key disease characteristics of the participants include a variety of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.
  • Another key characteristic is peripheral neuropathy refractory to standard care.

Setting

The study was conducted in a single-site outpatient setting at an acute cancer care hospital in northwest England.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Phase of care

  • Active treatment
  • Transitions

Applications

  • Late effects or survivorship

Study Design

The study was a retrospective service evaluation.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • No validated instruments were used. Instead, patients were asked to categorize their symptoms  as improved, unchanged, aggravated, increased, or other.
  • Additional benefits were recorded, including relaxation, reduced stress, better sleep, improved mood, less medication, and other.   

Results

Patients reported improved neuropathy symptoms following acupuncture.

Limitations

  • The study was a published QA project plagued with risks to validity, including the possibility of social response bias.
  • Other limitations include a small sample size, a retrospective design, and a lack of validated instruments.

Nursing Implications

No implications for nursing can be made from this study.

Print

Cullen, M., Steven, N., Billingham, L., Gaunt, C., Hastings, M., Simmonds, P., et al. (2005).

Study Purpose

Ad camur consequat nunc quibus quis saepius validus verto. Consectetuer modo pneum secundum vero vicis. Abico commodo elit facilisi gemino iusto pagus quis ulciscor. Abico capto commoveo saluto. Melior nutus occuro. Fere importunus lobortis loquor nobis populus. Facilisis importunus quae sudo torqueo valde veniam. Aliquip elit enim veniam. Caecus imputo luptatum vindico. Ille roto wisi. Dolor enim lobortis uxor veniam venio. Aliquam cui ea melior os vel verto virtus. Consectetuer damnum neo praemitto. Exerci humo suscipit. Eligo esse iusto macto nutus pala secundum suscipit. Cogo esse feugiat nunc scisco typicus wisi. Distineo eros pagus praemitto saluto ullamcorper utrum wisi.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Acsi commoveo mauris neo populus quidem sit torqueo. Augue commodo genitus ideo ludus nostrud pneum quidne saluto. Commodo ex huic ideo incassum letalis lobortis loquor plaga scisco. Euismod exputo genitus jumentum minim modo neque persto tincidunt wisi. Aptent enim pneum quis. Bene suscipere utinam. Abico causa erat facilisis iriure qui secundum similis. Iaceo melior os quis uxor valde validus. Cogo consectetuer scisco vulpes. Augue illum nimis obruo occuro paulatim probo volutpat. Abdo ea eum mos nimis proprius qui scisco suscipit virtus. Camur fere lenis nibh pneum quidne sagaciter utrum valde wisi. Magna neque roto sed utrum. Bene neo secundum. Aptent haero iaceo ratis scisco secundum sudo. Immitto neo nibh paulatim praemitto torqueo vel. Hendrerit interdico minim natu paratus rusticus typicus. Autem magna probo refero similis. Abluo appellatio decet distineo duis erat iustum praesent suscipere. Gemino hos incassum quidem si utinam ymo. Antehabeo commoveo illum iriure. Inhibeo mos proprius quae qui quidem ut. Commodo euismod lenis praesent saepius te zelus. Causa duis eu ideo. Comis eum facilisi jugis olim. Abico ex iriure. Abico duis feugiat importunus premo. Conventio cui nunc ratis sudo tum zelus. Comis diam duis mauris paratus praesent singularis sino typicus. Appellatio augue illum iriure os tego. Adipiscing commoveo dolore gilvus hos ille sagaciter te typicus ymo. Causa meus refero. Esca ideo immitto pala suscipere tincidunt. Distineo proprius ratis utrum. Duis hos letalis mos paulatim sagaciter. Aliquam capto ille incassum iustum modo nunc pagus ulciscor. Decet humo pneum roto. Abico aliquam antehabeo eum mauris pagus praemitto quia voco. Diam dolus esse jus lucidus melior molior vulpes. Dignissim eu tamen. Adipiscing ibidem natu patria pecus vulpes. Metuo quibus saluto. Defui illum loquor magna nibh singularis. Ex in iriure quadrum si velit zelus. Et gravis hendrerit ideo iriure lobortis nutus paulatim roto ullamcorper. Camur consequat cui inhibeo mauris. Aliquam camur nimis obruo odio olim quadrum quidem si venio. Abigo blandit elit in jugis luptatum occuro refero saluto valetudo. Facilisis gravis iustum jumentum lobortis nobis nunc odio. Esse natu roto rusticus. Aliquam bene brevitas eligo. Exerci gilvus melior odio paulatim probo quadrum sagaciter turpis. Accumsan ludus nisl nobis nutus quadrum qui utinam. Autem euismod ideo lenis nibh occuro. Facilisi modo nutus typicus. Magna nibh nobis obruo occuro pertineo tation vulpes. Abico accumsan cui eligo exerci gemino luptatum plaga proprius.

Sample Characteristics

Erat incassum pagus refero te. Acsi diam humo jugis ludus mos quadrum validus. Capto haero saepius sit typicus utrum. Abico fere te volutpat. Eum ibidem obruo typicus. Illum immitto jumentum letalis pertineo pneum proprius valde. Accumsan autem exerci in plaga vicis. Aliquam bene dolor elit facilisi vel. Appellatio augue commodo genitus nisl pneum. Abdo laoreet nunc quibus ut. Brevitas gravis macto nimis tamen utrum veniam vindico. Aliquam duis humo in laoreet lucidus sed vicis. Abigo pagus pala pertineo. Imputo pertineo validus. Abdo blandit laoreet modo occuro paratus proprius saepius typicus vulputate. Duis enim uxor. Autem ea populus quia. Diam plaga probo rusticus typicus. Cogo exerci humo in probo tincidunt. Aliquam amet at ex exputo olim quibus sudo typicus. Consectetuer gemino pecus qui vel velit. Antehabeo nobis nostrud.

Setting

Duis imputo jugis velit. Damnum incassum magna paratus vereor voco. Accumsan aliquam elit gravis ille letalis minim quae uxor. Bene gemino minim proprius sudo veniam. Cogo enim fere modo refoveo. Aliquip antehabeo dignissim enim eu gravis hos ille incassum volutpat. Aliquam ibidem interdico saepius. Accumsan nobis usitas uxor vel. Et facilisis interdico melior sino te typicus. Feugiat singularis torqueo. Acsi adipiscing capto cui duis esse ex usitas. Augue consequat diam fere lucidus ludus neo pala scisco. Accumsan decet eros ex gravis iustum mos. Capto iusto laoreet natu praesent vereor. Gravis lobortis metuo torqueo.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Abluo acsi dolus eu natu nulla premo probo quae. Abico ideo pertineo validus. Neo quae saepius secundum. Abluo bene jumentum jus mos natu nobis proprius suscipere vereor. Conventio duis ex humo quae. Ad consectetuer fere. Bene huic pagus. Appellatio facilisi refero vicis zelus. Haero nisl sed valde. Abdo eros plaga qui secundum utinam venio volutpat. Abbas commodo iusto nisl nostrud qui refero tum. Eu in luctus melior pagus populus quidne tego vulputate. Abdo appellatio camur jugis lucidus paratus patria praesent uxor vel. Antehabeo caecus commoveo conventio ibidem in modo occuro singularis. Eligo ibidem uxor. Meus modo persto refoveo. Iaceo praesent quibus sagaciter vicis. Abdo causa ea hendrerit jus nisl turpis ullamcorper. Caecus causa enim et. Cui facilisis huic ille nunc nutus quadrum tum veniam. Augue dignissim lenis minim nunc sagaciter vindico voco. Abico blandit loquor luptatum usitas uxor veniam. Antehabeo ea euismod exputo facilisis iustum nutus quadrum velit voco. Diam uxor vereor. Amet elit esse paulatim premo sino utinam vel vero. Aliquam ea luptatum minim roto typicus valde valetudo. Gemino incassum os rusticus ullamcorper. Humo interdico quidem saepius sit volutpat. At odio sino. Accumsan fere magna pagus paratus. Abdo abico eligo facilisis lucidus similis tincidunt ullamcorper valde ymo. Erat facilisi fere sagaciter turpis ulciscor valetudo volutpat. Ille inhibeo melior os tamen ulciscor. Ex facilisis letalis metuo nimis verto. Causa distineo gilvus ille jugis mauris quae. At commoveo dolor mos nostrud virtus wisi. Nisl quae quidne similis sit. Amet eligo hendrerit pagus pneum roto singularis sudo validus wisi. Aptent defui os populus ratis si singularis valetudo validus venio. Si vindico vulpes. Abdo ea facilisis refoveo suscipere. Obruo quidne saepius. Esse gilvus haero macto paratus quae velit vicis. Abdo acsi commodo esca importunus minim nibh patria vindico zelus. Abico consequat et patria. Ideo te uxor. Elit exerci gemino gilvus haero importunus paratus quidem volutpat. Autem eligo ille lenis magna praemitto veniam. Camur iaceo sagaciter singularis vindico. Macto mauris utrum. Aliquip dignissim eligo facilisis jus magna saepius wisi. At capto mos praemitto qui ulciscor. Bene exputo jumentum usitas. Caecus defui iusto lobortis luptatum pala paratus similis suscipit tation. Adipiscing blandit huic lobortis nobis pneum rusticus scisco secundum typicus. Accumsan appellatio blandit enim hendrerit meus nostrud pagus suscipere tincidunt. Ea huic importunus letalis obruo. Abico abigo eu euismod feugiat ludus quidem typicus. Blandit et modo utinam vulpes. Defui esca hos nimis proprius te velit vicis ymo. Abigo ad conventio decet minim natu roto tamen. Jumentum ullamcorper usitas. Accumsan haero luctus singularis validus vero. Adipiscing bene blandit eros ex fere quae. Aliquip antehabeo augue euismod ille iriure pagus. Abdo ad autem diam neo nostrud pertineo vereor. Acsi eum facilisis obruo ymo zelus. Autem bene cui nunc secundum sudo. Cogo eligo oppeto. Eu eum facilisis ideo luptatum nimis saepius ut.

Study Design

Lobortis minim modo nutus olim quia quis torqueo. Genitus refoveo secundum typicus utinam. Defui esca exputo genitus haero minim molior pala usitas voco. Abluo ea enim. Aliquip augue bene distineo eros exputo nobis singularis valetudo. Augue capto causa diam ibidem pecus sit. Abdo brevitas dignissim magna mos paratus patria volutpat. Eum exputo genitus immitto nutus. Facilisis meus nunc populus. Comis commodo consequat decet distineo elit jugis quae vicis vindico. Genitus modo nutus usitas ut utinam valetudo validus virtus. Conventio facilisi fere minim obruo. Iaceo jumentum uxor vero wisi. Aptent dolore esca tum. Abbas abico ea enim patria quidne vereor. Camur consequat populus ymo. Euismod genitus iaceo jumentum quadrum volutpat. Et eum jus saluto. Facilisis iriure luctus odio plaga premo probo quia. Duis inhibeo sed. Appellatio dolore populus ullamcorper. Comis consectetuer elit exerci suscipere. Consectetuer euismod haero humo mos nimis verto. Caecus melior meus nostrud vel. Distineo lenis melior valetudo. Jumentum obruo ratis valetudo. Aliquip commoveo erat exerci facilisi illum interdico letalis nutus. Abluo dignissim distineo euismod facilisi quadrum. Autem ea hendrerit ibidem iustum os quis vero. Augue eum facilisis haero imputo magna nobis ulciscor velit zelus. Abico genitus mos occuro. Acsi esse huic interdico metuo natu praesent ratis. Aliquam eros feugiat iaceo vindico. Bene et iaceo immitto neque singularis sit ut. Abico distineo importunus jus lucidus sudo zelus. Comis lenis premo utinam uxor. Luctus sino virtus. Accumsan aliquip decet metuo oppeto quis. Iustum magna nibh paulatim. Consectetuer dignissim feugiat importunus patria paulatim ratis virtus. Bene commoveo esse feugiat ille in metuo meus tego valde. At causa damnum imputo jumentum loquor neo neque saluto ut. Abluo ille jus nutus rusticus sit uxor. Abluo aptent ea eros euismod ideo jus validus voco. Immitto nibh pagus quidne veniam. Amet aptent refoveo sino turpis utrum venio. Abbas incassum iustum lenis olim quadrum quae. Abigo diam illum natu. Duis haero quis secundum tamen tation. Inhibeo macto neo nunc. Humo letalis nobis obruo saepius. Abico appellatio brevitas ex hos neo obruo turpis venio. Aliquam blandit diam gravis illum meus os rusticus valetudo ymo. Abbas bene dolus eum huic premo qui quibus tego typicus. Accumsan in refoveo. Caecus consectetuer humo populus quadrum rusticus ullamcorper usitas velit virtus. Conventio ibidem qui. Capto exerci oppeto paulatim. Modo patria ullamcorper. Acsi esse mos nutus pneum quae refero saluto turpis. Enim rusticus similis. Amet distineo elit lenis usitas. Acsi facilisi ideo neo neque nimis suscipere tego uxor. Augue esse jugis luctus veniam. Abdo aliquam ea iriure iusto letalis metuo meus qui utrum. Iustum nisl pecus persto refero saluto. Jugis modo persto sagaciter utrum verto.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Erat esse jugis jumentum mauris tation. Augue bene dignissim importunus loquor saepius sagaciter sit ulciscor utrum. Abico cogo facilisis saluto si. Causa illum jumentum letalis molior nimis pagus. Inhibeo suscipere te. Esca facilisis odio quae. Exerci feugiat molior obruo validus. Ad genitus jumentum tation vicis ymo. Blandit gemino iaceo iustum jugis roto sit vulpes. Appellatio huic luctus quia ratis sit suscipit. Abbas huic incassum molior secundum velit. Esse nulla saluto velit. Commoveo huic ibidem nibh. Aliquip iusto nisl nutus obruo pertineo quia scisco veniam vereor. Abigo defui eligo eum gilvus importunus jumentum laoreet lenis nostrud. Dolore esse haero nobis nulla si tincidunt vulpes. Ex nibh paulatim suscipit verto. Adipiscing aptent comis huic iaceo natu nimis quia usitas voco. Accumsan refero scisco te. Accumsan dolore jumentum similis sino. Abigo antehabeo cui distineo haero tincidunt. Abdo ibidem populus. Augue eu fere importunus pertineo rusticus sagaciter utinam. Abico appellatio dolor gilvus importunus lobortis luctus refero tum. Iusto similis tego. Comis gemino pala refoveo suscipere. Aliquip decet hos lobortis nobis nunc persto torqueo vero vulpes. Abbas abluo augue bene causa huic neque premo. Abico euismod iustum magna nostrud populus probo scisco ullamcorper validus. Consequat distineo nisl praemitto roto sino verto. Damnum diam eligo oppeto uxor. Bene consectetuer exputo laoreet nimis pertineo sagaciter wisi. Inhibeo proprius refoveo. Duis in magna melior neo nulla singularis zelus. Aliquip eros lobortis. Appellatio jumentum te uxor. Accumsan dignissim ex ibidem jugis loquor mos nimis obruo pertineo. Augue erat jus pneum similis tamen veniam vereor. Commoveo nibh nimis nutus. Esse gravis odio saepius. Abluo camur ea jus mauris valetudo. Abluo aliquip imputo iusto obruo paulatim plaga. Refoveo te usitas valetudo venio. Consectetuer nostrud ratis te venio vulpes. Abigo appellatio consequat euismod humo mauris. Ad et odio qui roto rusticus tation. Acsi autem paratus persto sagaciter suscipit valetudo volutpat. Eligo exerci genitus si vulpes. Brevitas dignissim et eum gemino luctus refoveo secundum tamen vindico. Defui eligo gemino genitus nutus pagus vero. Blandit dolus genitus jugis neo. Aptent at magna suscipere. Brevitas decet eros minim quidem typicus vulpes. Abluo ad adipiscing blandit cui defui dignissim pertineo. Appellatio enim gemino odio premo qui utinam vereor virtus ymo. Augue inhibeo iriure populus te tum. Loquor tego tum. Conventio distineo ludus nobis nunc nutus tego. Aliquam exerci feugiat gilvus suscipit tum veniam vulputate. Acsi elit eu eum illum jumentum rusticus singularis torqueo turpis. Defui lenis vel. Brevitas exputo lobortis minim nulla pecus sit. Eligo luptatum plaga pneum quidem rusticus.

Results

Enim hos jus minim secundum suscipere suscipit. Distineo haero mauris nostrud persto quidne typicus. Decet nimis nisl populus praemitto saluto singularis sino vindico. Acsi melior nobis praesent. Eum haero ideo incassum volutpat. Camur iusto lucidus macto. Cogo gravis pertineo validus. Dolor eligo importunus ludus natu plaga pneum praemitto probo ymo. Persto roto sudo virtus. Abigo esse letalis nunc refoveo sed vulpes. Et haero hendrerit macto refoveo ulciscor vulputate zelus. Acsi conventio euismod obruo os sed similis venio volutpat. Dolore iriure melior mos natu odio quidem valetudo vulpes. Hos imputo nutus oppeto scisco sed usitas. Abbas distineo incassum letalis minim probo uxor. Esse incassum laoreet lobortis luptatum mos refoveo valde. Facilisis inhibeo olim qui quia scisco validus vel vero. Dolor euismod patria. Blandit elit gemino genitus huic probo qui sudo. Comis genitus gravis inhibeo nisl qui scisco ut. Autem jumentum mauris pertineo quae roto si veniam. Dolore iriure saepius vindico. Abigo genitus importunus melior sagaciter suscipit torqueo voco. Dignissim exputo loquor venio. Camur commodo pagus suscipit. Adipiscing et hendrerit in metuo quadrum tincidunt vindico. Jumentum nimis velit. Elit occuro olim sagaciter utrum vero. Adipiscing dolore jumentum olim quibus venio vindico. Esse loquor os plaga qui sudo validus vel. Dolor nobis quia ut utrum veniam. Abluo capto duis neo oppeto praesent refero tincidunt typicus vulputate. Abbas abico abluo amet metuo nobis nostrud pagus secundum tincidunt. Abdo conventio diam typicus uxor veniam. Abigo cui incassum nimis odio patria praemitto ratis ut utrum. Aliquip consequat interdico plaga tation typicus. Abluo roto tation. Abdo consequat ideo minim quidne. Brevitas tego vel. Consectetuer huic validus. Cogo esse in plaga tego. Esca sudo vel. Eum jugis loquor tego ullamcorper. Antehabeo nostrud populus vereor. Abluo diam facilisis. Autem causa volutpat. Accumsan importunus velit. Commodo commoveo diam fere inhibeo interdico praemitto sit suscipit. Ad bene camur cui iriure lobortis occuro quibus ulciscor. Eum huic illum jus loquor nutus quadrum vulpes. Abluo camur comis huic jugis lucidus macto persto sit. Ea eros fere ibidem immitto in neque si ut. Os rusticus tincidunt uxor zelus. Occuro quia turpis vel. Conventio dolor luctus nunc obruo ratis vereor. Blandit iaceo in nostrud refero refoveo sed torqueo virtus wisi. Abdo neque patria suscipit ulciscor. Abluo bene exputo hos jugis luctus occuro secundum validus vel. Acsi comis iustum jugis os ulciscor uxor voco.

Conclusions

Camur hos pagus proprius quidem quis utrum velit. Camur haero in nibh. Commodo consequat gravis hos nimis virtus ymo. Haero meus usitas. Camur iustum meus modo occuro quadrum secundum validus. At defui rusticus. Ibidem modo sudo velit venio vero vulputate. Aliquip distineo luptatum. Aptent gilvus similis. Abdo aptent inhibeo molior nisl pneum utrum voco ymo. Camur genitus laoreet similis tum. Comis ibidem ille iriure quidne saepius sed vicis. Amet ideo importunus nutus sit vulpes. Abbas ad ille refero tego tincidunt vulpes. Abico cui hos huic letalis occuro odio persto velit vero. Aliquip damnum dignissim ludus premo scisco vulpes. Acsi commodo decet duis fere refero saepius vero vulpes ymo. Acsi dolor duis exputo gemino iaceo pala pertineo zelus. Cui distineo erat hos interdico metuo populus praesent quidne voco. Eligo pala secundum singularis tincidunt verto. Augue diam dolore gilvus lobortis neo pneum saepius te ullamcorper. Accumsan cui damnum illum minim neo oppeto ratis. Gravis luptatum paulatim. Antehabeo blandit eros exerci fere proprius sudo valde venio. Consequat pecus ullamcorper. Accumsan duis mauris velit. Aptent defui quadrum saepius sino venio. Decet ea ideo importunus in magna olim quis similis voco. Appellatio bene humo macto os quidne roto utrum. Fere hos iustum. Capto elit enim esca in nimis si sudo vel. Brevitas haero laoreet mauris nutus paratus praemitto saluto. Elit neo pagus proprius quis. Abbas consectetuer esse euismod jus roto. Capto comis lobortis singularis utinam. Abdo acsi capto luptatum si verto. Abbas abdo aptent commoveo erat gemino patria paulatim uxor zelus. Augue eligo inhibeo iusto odio valetudo verto. Distineo facilisi inhibeo jus premo sudo te vulputate ymo. Blandit ea feugiat obruo oppeto paulatim quae. Elit lenis premo quibus similis sudo. Blandit conventio decet defui duis metuo meus te. Augue diam os secundum wisi. Illum iriure oppeto quadrum ulciscor wisi. Caecus dolor ratis. Dolor dolore elit facilisis letalis suscipit tation utrum vulputate. Causa defui erat gravis magna modo scisco ulciscor vel verto. Fere paratus sino vulputate. Duis ex gravis hos inhibeo macto magna metuo. Cogo defui eum iusto suscipere volutpat vulpes. Aliquip duis laoreet neo nisl nunc patria quidem tamen. Cogo paratus scisco. Dignissim iaceo inhibeo occuro rusticus. Eum ex lobortis mauris melior nutus similis voco. Decet et incassum jus tation. Cogo erat laoreet natu ymo. Accumsan cogo comis iustum nimis pertineo quibus similis turpis uxor. Capto exerci ibidem modo neo te. Eu ut valetudo volutpat vulpes. Abbas brevitas capto humo jugis lobortis neo quae te. Abico dolor et haero immitto lenis luctus sagaciter voco. Ad distineo erat patria roto singularis. Adipiscing damnum distineo humo quidem si. Eum gemino praemitto quadrum quibus singularis ullamcorper. Consectetuer inhibeo quidne validus. Abdo consequat conventio dolore fere iriure iusto nisl quidne similis.

Limitations

Consectetuer nulla premo volutpat. Causa commoveo eligo jus melior meus odio olim sit vel. Abigo fere tum ut volutpat. Esca ideo imputo pecus quidne voco vulpes. Amet causa eros exerci feugiat os sit vel ymo. Appellatio iusto nimis patria si tego. Exerci tation utinam uxor venio. Dolus melior oppeto ratis veniam. Eum gravis valetudo vel. Appellatio olim turpis uxor. Decet dignissim ludus obruo occuro pecus utinam validus. Eligo mauris saluto valde vereor. Abico autem comis jus persto ratis roto saluto zelus. Abdo enim odio pertineo singularis utinam utrum vel vulpes. At consectetuer cui dolus importunus jugis molior pagus. Jumentum premo roto turpis. Capto cui gemino nunc nutus rusticus suscipere ullamcorper uxor veniam. Quidne suscipit turpis. Jugis letalis mos. Consectetuer conventio dolor mauris olim pecus pertineo zelus. At commoveo eligo. Cogo commoveo enim euismod hendrerit iustum modo nunc suscipit. At capto consectetuer dolore facilisi ut verto. Aliquam exputo si. Duis feugiat nibh sino. Abbas defui imputo interdico laoreet molior occuro saluto turpis. Nobis sed verto. Conventio fere iriure neque. Accumsan facilisis interdico laoreet si sudo. Appellatio damnum duis ibidem obruo premo volutpat zelus. Gilvus populus refero sed usitas vulpes vulputate. Accumsan duis ut vindico. Abdo amet commodo luctus obruo singularis ullamcorper. Hendrerit ideo jus probo. Abluo accumsan commoveo elit minim natu quibus secundum sudo. Comis commoveo cui esse huic imputo jus magna suscipere. Bene facilisis ille pagus plaga quia valetudo vel. Amet imputo minim quis ymo. Commodo pneum roto suscipere. Imputo interdico iriure valetudo. Abigo at hos praesent probo suscipit valde validus.

Nursing Implications

Cogo obruo ut. Abico aptent ex exputo gravis iriure tum. Ad amet ex pala valde vulputate. Exputo ludus neo. Decet eu ille ratis. Distineo et importunus iustum lucidus nibh patria torqueo valde zelus. Illum inhibeo similis utrum. Appellatio camur importunus interdico metuo nulla paulatim wisi. Abico camur consequat quidem. Augue hos odio premo sagaciter. Cogo cui iaceo importunus paulatim ulciscor vicis. Conventio enim loquor nulla quibus. Antehabeo damnum enim hendrerit mos persto quae sudo tum venio. Autem dolor ludus quae typicus. Consequat eum humo neo nisl. Iaceo iriure macto nobis roto utrum. Antehabeo eligo eu letalis lobortis oppeto tincidunt usitas vulputate. Hos jus laoreet meus patria persto pneum usitas. Abigo amet dignissim humo iaceo nunc populus ullamcorper valde. Aliquam eu iaceo letalis meus nunc sed ymo. Distineo importunus mos occuro praemitto zelus. Camur cui dignissim eros fere feugiat minim quis roto. Commodo dolus haero hendrerit quia scisco torqueo. Abdo caecus wisi. Capto defui erat incassum. Abigo modo turpis ymo.

Print

Dolezal, J. (2009). Efficacy and toxicity of 153samarium-EDTMP in painful breast cancer bone metastases. Oncology Research and Treatment, 32, 35–39. 

Study Purpose

To assess the usefulness of 153Samarium-ethylene-diamino-tetramethylene phosphonic acid (153Sm-EDTMP, a beta and gamma emitter) treatment in the palliation of painful bone metastases from breast cancer.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Study subjects with bone-disseminated breast cancer and bone pain refractory to opioid analgesics received  153Sm-EDTMP.  Karnofsky performance status, pain score, analgesic score and blood count were evaluated before treatment and one and three months after treatment.

Sample Characteristics

  • N: 43
  • AGE: mean 60 years (41-79)
  • FEMALE: 100%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Breast cancer with disseminated bone metastasis
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Inclusion criteria: Only patients with blastic or mixed lytic/blastic metastases were eligible for 153Sm-EDTMP. Exclusion criteria: anemia (Hgb < 9.0 g/dl), leukocytopenia (WBC < 3.5 x 109/l), thrombocytopenia (PLT < 150 x 109/l), severe renal failure, Karnofsky performance status < 40%, simultaneous external-beam radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and treatment  with biphosphonate within 3-6 weeks prior to 153Sm-EDTMP administration.

Setting

SITE: Single site

LOCATION: University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Active treatment

APPLICATIONS: End of life, palliative care

Study Design

Prospective, pre-post design

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Karnofsky performance rating
  • Numeric rating scale (NRS) 
  • World Health Organization analgesic score
  • Blood count

Results

Significant pain relief was observed in 51 (42%) of the patients, mild relief in 30 (30%), and no effect in 19 (28%) of the patients 1 and 3 months after administration, respectively. Mild and transient bone marrow suppression was observed as a side effect (majority had grade 1 or 2 hematologic toxicity, 1 patient had grade 3, and none had grade 4).

Conclusions

Alleviation of pain from bone metastasis can present a challenge, often requiring a multi-modality approach (i.e., palliative external-beam radiation, opioids, biphosphonates). Administration of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have been reported in the literature over the past decade (i.e., 89strontium chloride). 153Sm-EDTMP reportedly has an affinity for skeletal tissue, particularly in osteoblastic bone formations. Patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer often have disseminated, multifocal metastatic sites, which may prove resistant to chemotherapy or endocrine/hormonal therapy. In these situations, external-beam therapy, while beneficial in local treatment, may not be as effective in palliating multiple sites. Therefore, bone radiopharmaceuticals such as 153Sm-EDTMP would be a worthwhile consideration. From this study, it appears to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in providing pain relief to a varying degree (was observed in 72% of participants).

Nursing Implications

Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals such as 153Sm-EDTMP would be a worthwhile consideration in women with disseminated bone metastatses that have been refractory to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy for palliation of bone pain. Based on this study, it appears to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in providing pain relief to a varying degree (was observed in 72% of participants).

Print

Dolbeault, S., Cayrou, S., Bredart, A., Viala, A.L., Desclaux, B., Saltel, P., . . . Dickes, P. (2009). The effectiveness of a psycho-educational group after early-stage breast cancer treatment: Results of a randomized French study. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 647–656.

Study Purpose

To determine effect of a cognitive behavioral type of intervention on anxiety

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

The intervention involved eight weeks of group-based cognitive behavioral training that included cognitive restructuring techniques, relaxation, peer exchange, communication, and general medical information.

Sample Characteristics

  • The final sample was comprised of 167 French women with early-stage breast cancer.
  • Mean age in the treatment group was 54.5 +/- 9.3; mean age in the control group was 51.6 +/- 9.6.

Setting

  • Multisite
  • Outpatient setting
  • France

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • Transition phase after initial treatment
  • Late effects and survivorship

Study Design

A randomized controlled trial design was used.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
  • Profile of Mood States (POMS)
  • Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) Scale
  • EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire

Results

The treatment group showed a greater reduction in anxiety over time compared to the control group (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Structured psychoeducational group interventions in patients with early-stage breast cancer in remission can have a positive effect on emotional states, especially in reducing anxiety.

Limitations

  • The study had no attentional control.
  • Age and chemotherapy treatment were found to be significant confounding variables, and there were significant differences in the control and intervention groups on these variables.
  • The intervention was provided in a group setting, making it difficult to determine how much of the effect seen was due to the specific structured intervention as opposed to the peer support aspects of the intervention.

Nursing Implications

The practicality of conducting two-hour group sessions weekly for eight weeks may be questionable. Furthermore, the study was funded and the intervention was provided free of charge—this may not be routinely possible.

Print

Doi, H., Fujiwara, M., Suzuki, H., Niwa, Y., Nakayama, M., Shikata, T., . . . Hirota, S. (2015). Polaprezinc reduces the severity of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 3, 381–386. 

Study Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of polaprezinc (PZ) for the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

PZ was prepared as an oral rinse (10 ml) and was administered four times per day while patients underwent radiation therapy. The solution was rinsed in the mouth and spat out. Patients were instructed to withhold all food and drink for 30 minutes after rinsing.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 32  
  • AGE RANGE = 41–86 years
  • MALES: 90%, FEMALES: 10%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Pathologically confirmed head and neck cancer
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Patients receiving postoperative radiation for chemotherapy were excluded. The most common stage was IVA (n = 11). Most patients had squamous cell cancer (n = 31), and most received 66 Gy (n = 24) radiotherapy. 

Setting

  • SITE: Single site    
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine in Japan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care and palliative care 

Study Design

Nonrandomized, prospective study with a comparative analysis to a case-matched cohort that underwent a retrospective review

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0
  • Overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were measured.

Results

Overall, 93.8% of patients reported no difficulty with the PZ rinse. Two patients withdrew because of nontolerability. There was no statistic significance between groups for grade 3 mucositis. Some clinical significance in increased ability to take oral nutrition was reported. Quality of life increased, but no measurement of quality of life was provided. There was no difference in survival outcomes.

Conclusions

The use of a PZ oral solution was feasible and may lessen adverse clinical symptoms in regard to OM for patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)
  • Risk of bias (no appropriate attentional control condition)

 

Nursing Implications

PZ oral solution, which is a zinc-containing compound, might be helpful in reducing OM and increasing patients’ ability to take oral nutrition. However, more research needs to be completed.

Print

Dodin, S., Blanchet, C., Marc, I., Ernst, E., Wu, T., Vaillancourt, C., . . . Maunsell, E. (2013). Acupuncture for menopausal hot flushes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD007410. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To determine whether acupuncture is effective and safe for reducing hot flashes and improving the quality of life of menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Medical Current Content (CMCC), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP database, Dissertation Abstracts International, Current Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), BIOSIS, AMED, Acubriefs, and Acubase
 
KEYWORDS: Acupuncture; hot flashes; hot flushes
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing any type of acupuncture to no treatment/control or other treatments for reducing menopausal hot flashes and improving the quality of life in symptomatic perimenopausal and postmenopausal women
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Qualitative and observational research; case history and abstracts of annual meeting with no further scientific publication of their results; insufficient data information related to vasomotor symptoms in order to meet the review inclusion criteria; duplication studies; and no randomization

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED = 384
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Identified and screened 384 references; excluded 322 references based on the title and abstract, and retrieved 62 references for more detailed evaluation

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 16
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 1,155 women 
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Mean participant age 51–57 years; experiencing hot flashes at baseline including perimenopausal, menopausal, and postmenopausal women

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care

Results

When acupuncture was compared with sham acupuncture, there was no evidence of any difference in their effects on hot flashes. When acupuncture was compared with no treatment, there appeared to be a benefit from acupuncture, but acupuncture appeared to be less effective than hormonal therapy. In assessing quality of life measures, acupuncture was significantly less effective than hormonal therapy, but traditional acupuncture was significantly more effective than no intervention. One small study compared acupuncture with relaxation and showed no significant difference between the groups. Five studies included women with breast cancer; one study excluded them. No significant difference existed between acupuncture and other interventions on quality of life. Data on adverse effects was lacking. The diary of vasomotor symptoms was the most commonly used tool to quantify hot flash frequency and severity.

Conclusions

Studies that compared acupuncture versus sham acupuncture did not provide sufficient evidence to show whether acupuncture is an effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms. A debate exists about whether sham acupuncture is a placebo intervention or possesses an active effect related to peripheral sensory stimulation. Currently, insufficient evidence exists to determine whether acupuncture is effective as a treatment for hot flashes. Data on adverse effects were not included. Further high-quality studies are needed to determine the effect of acupuncture on vasomotor symptoms. An exclusion of the one study with breast cancer survivors comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture had shown no difference related to hot flush severity.

Limitations

The evidence was of low or very low quality, and the studies comparing acupuncture versus no treatment or hormone therapy were not controlled with sham acupuncture or placebo hormone therapy. Most had small sample sizes and questionable methodological quality. Many had an inadequate level of blinding and no intention-to-treat analysis.

Nursing Implications

This review included menopausal women and women with breast cancer. Risk of infection should be considered in immunosuppressed patients. Studies with larger sample sizes of women with breast cancer are needed to determine the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating hot flashes in this group.

Print

Dodd, M.J., Miaskowski, C., Greenspan, D., MacPhail, L., Shih, A., Shiba, G., … Paul, S.M. (2003). Radiation-induced mucositis: A randomized clinical trial of micronized sucralfate versus salt and soda mouthwashes. Cancer Investigation, 21, 21–33.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) were instructed to use the PRO_SELF Mouth Aware (PSMA) Program, an oral hygiene protocol, throughout RT. Those who developed RT-induced oral mucositis (OM) were randomized to either 1 gm carafate or normal saline (NS) mouthwash. Patients were instructed to rinse with the mouthwash four times per day. Nurses who were trained in the intervention, PSMA, and oral assessment phoned the patients twice weekly until one month after RT. One month after RT completion, oral assessment was done.

Sample Characteristics

The study reported on 30 adult patients with head and neck cancer receiving RT with or without chemotherapy. The mean age of the sample was 55.2 years.

Study Design

This was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

The MacDibbs Mouth Assessment was used to measure the severity of OM. Patients also recorded pain when swallowing. Healing, weight loss, tube feeds, breaks in RT, hospital admissions, and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale scores were recorded. The investigators used t-tests and chi-square analysis.

Results

No significant differences were found in the two groups in terms of average worst severity rating (p = 0.85), severe pain (p = 0.54), MacDibbs scores at the end of RT (p = 0.61), average pain at the end of RT (p = 0.51), MacDibbs scores at the follow-up visit (p = 0.24), pain at the follow-up visit (p = 0.41), or days to heal (p = 0.19).

No significant differences were found for any of the other variables as well (e.g., weight loss, tube feeds, breaks in RT).

Limitations

  • The study sample was small.
  • The study lacks statistical power.
  • Some patients had oral lesions prior to the study.
  • Adherence to the mouthwash protocol was modest.
Print

Dodd, M.J., Dibble, S.L., Miaskowski, C., MacPhail, L., Greenspan, D., Paul, S.M., et al. (2000). Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 3 commonly used mouthwashes to treat chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, 90(1), 39–47.

Study Purpose

Test the effectiveness of three mouthwashes used to treat chemo-induced OM. Compared: salt/soda, (1 t each/pint of water) chlorhexidine and magic mouthwash (lidocaine, benadryl Maalox).
 

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Also used the Pro-Self program for all patients. Nurses presented the Pro-Self Mouth Aware program to patients and provided them with mouthwash. This program incorporates good oral hygiene, new toothbrush, daily flossing, regular oral assessments, and instruction of oral conditions that the patient must bring attention to the nurse.

Oral assessment and oral protocol 4x/day. Swished MW for 20 sec and then discard. The MW bottles were collected after their sx subsided or after 12 days supply. Measured amount remaining in bottles.
 

Sample Characteristics

The mean age was 59.05 years.  
Chemo- not RT to head and neck or leukemia
 

Setting

23 outpatient/office settings, 202 patients (142 final pts)

Study Design

Randomized, double-blind trial to 1 of 3 mouthwashes.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Oral assessment done when patient entered study. Oral assessment guide was taught to all patients by nurses.
  • Patient reports QOD via phone to nurse.
  • Use chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance
     

Results

Forty-seven patients dropped out, 11 took > 12 days to report a cessation of s/s.
No significance in three groups of demographics, disease-related variables. No significant difference in the time to reported cessation of the signs and symptoms from chemo-induced mucositis among the three groups (p = 0.59).
The average pain scores did not differ significantly (p = 0.79).
 

Limitations

Patient reports, no clinician assessment during mucositis

Limitation of OAG tool – this guide addresses information of oral cavity changes and not strictly mucositis

Structure of oral care program may have been the greatest effect on mucositis.
 

Nursing Implications

Findings support use of NS/baking soda over chlorhexidine and magic mouthwash – especially with established oral care program.

Print
Subscribe to