Online Exclusive Article

Norwegian Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Patient Knowledge and Involvement as Basis for Decision Making in Hematology

Frode Heldal

Aslak Steinsbekk

patient empowerment
ONF 2009, 36(2), E93-E98. DOI: 10.1188/09.ONF.E93-E98

Purpose/Objectives: To investigate how healthcare professionals relate to patients with different levels of knowledge and involvement in their disease and treatment.

Design: Qualitative, exploratory approach based on semi-structured interviews.

Setting: A hematologic outpatient clinic in Norway.

Sample: 5 nurses and 5 doctors.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted, recorded on audiotape, transcribed, and analyzed with qualitative techniques.

Main Research Variables: Patient knowledge, patient involvement, and decision making.

Findings: Study participants perceived that they had stable, basic relationships with patients and were flexible toward patients with different levels of knowledge and involvement. Healthcare professionals grouped patients into four behavior types: passive, withdrawn, uncooperative, and expert. The perceived behaviors formed the basis for relationships involving shared or nonshared decision making.

Conclusions: Patients' perceived propensity in mastering medical knowledge affects how healthcare professionals involve them in decision making. Healthcare professionals' tendency to see relationships with patients as asymmetric and stable may inhibit patients' ability to involve themselves in their healthcare decisions.

Implications for Nursing: This study's findings can be used to raise awareness of how nurses' biases about patients influence shared decision making. Nurses should be aware of a tendency to exclude patients from decision making if they perceive that patients are incapable of involving themselves.

Jump to a section

    References

    Bruera, E., Sweeney, C., Calder, K., Palmer, L., & Benisch-Tolley, S. (2001). Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(11), 2883-2885.
    Bruera, E., Willey, J., Palmer, J., & Rosales, M. (2002). Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: Patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer, 94(7), 2076-2080.
    Degner, L. F., Kristjanson, L. J., Bowman, D., Sloan, J. A., Carriere, K. C., O'Neil, J., et al. (1997). Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA, 277(18), 1485-1492.
    Donaldson, L. (2003). Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS. BMJ, 326(7402), 1279-1280.
    Elkin, E. B., Kim, S. H., Casper, E. S., Kissane, D. W., & Schrag, D. (2007). Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(33), 5275-5280.
    Ferrell, B., Virani, R., Smith, S., & Juarez, G. (2003). The role of oncology nursing to ensure quality care for cancer survivors: A report commissioned by the National Cancer Policy Board and Institute of Medicine [Online exclusive]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30(1), E1-E11. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.ons.org/publications/journals/onf/Volume30/Issue1/pdf/32.pdf http://www.ons.org/publications/journals/onf/Volume30/Issue1/pdf/32.pdf
    Foucault, M. (1980). Body/power. In C. Gordon (Ed. & Trans.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 55-62). New York: Pantheon Books.
    Fox, N. J., Ward, K. J., & O'Rourke, A. J. (2005). The "expert patient": Empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs, and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine, 60(6), 1299-1309.
    Gattelari, M., Buttow, P., & Tattersall, M. (2001). Sharing decisions in cancer care. Social Science and Medicine, 52(12), 1865-1878.
    Health Library. (2008). Blodsykdommer [Blood diseases]. Retrieved February 9, 2009, from http://www.helsebiblioteket.no/Legemidler/Blodsykdommer
    Henwood, F., Wyatt, S., Hart, A., & Smith, J. (2003). "Ignorance is bliss sometimes": Constraints on the emergence of the "informed patient" in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(6), 589-607.
    Koelen, M. A., & Lindstrom, B. (2000). Making healthy choices easy choices: The role of empowerment. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(1, Suppl.), S10-S15.
    Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
    Lupton, D. (1997). Consumerism, reflexivity, and the medical encounter. Social Science and Medicine, 45(3), 373-381.
    Rothenbacher, D., Lutz, M., & Porzsolt, F. (1997). Treatment decisions in palliative cancer care: Patients' preferences for involvement and doctors' knowledge about it. European Journal of Cancer, 33(8), 1184-1189.
    Stiggelbout, A. M., & Kiebert, G. M. (1997). A role for the sick role: Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157(4), 383-389.
    Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
    Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., & De Maeseneer, J. (2005). Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: Does it make a difference? Patient Education and Counseling, 56(2), 139-146.