Purpose/Objectives: To explore the influence of lung cancer diagnosis on interpersonal dynamics in families in which one or more members continue to smoke following diagnosis.
Research Approach: Descriptive, qualitative.
Setting: Three cancer care sites in western Canada.
Participants: 16 participants from 8 family dyads.
Methodologic Approach: Patients with lung cancer receiving treatment and immediate family members were recruited to participate in individual or conjoint semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis was conducted on transcribed interviews.
Main Research Variables: Intrafamily interaction patterns, smoking and smoking cessation, lung cancer diagnosis.
Findings: Following diagnosis, patients with lung cancer experienced considerable distress as they struggled to understand family members' continued smoking. Patient orientations to family members who smoked included preserving relationships (maintaining harmony and connection with family members took priority over directly intervening with smokers) and risking relationships (patients repeatedly confronted family members about continued smoking to influence their cessation despite the impact on relationships). Neither pattern was successful in engaging relatives in smoking reduction or cessation, and the risking relationships approach resulted in conflict and strained family relationships.
Conclusions: The findings provide additional support for examining family dynamics related to tobacco reduction and cessation as well as directions for future research.
Interpretation: Nurses should encourage tobacco reduction as a supportive intervention for patients with lung cancer and their families to eliminate smoking-related distress.
References
Badr, H., & Taylor, C.L. (2006). Social constraints and spousal communication in lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 15(8), 673-683.
Bottorff, J.L., Kalaw, C., Johnson, J.L., Chambers, N., Stewart, M., Greaves, L., et al. (2005). Unraveling smoking ties: How tobacco use is embedded in couple interactions. Research in Nursing and Health, 28(4), 316-328.
Bottorff, J.L., Kalaw, C., Johnson, J.L., Stewart, M., Greaves, L., & Carey, J. (2006). Couple dynamics during women's tobacco reduction in pregnancy and postpartum. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 8(4), 499-509.
Bottorff, J.L., Robinson, C., Nelems, B., & Humer, M. (2007). Families facilitating and eliminating tobacco (FACET): Family relationships, smoking, and lung cancer. Unpublished research proposal. University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada.
Bunton, R., Murphy, S., & Bennett, P. (1991). Theories of behavioral change and their use in health promotion: Some neglected areas. Health Education Research, 6(2), 153-162.
Clark, M.M., Cox, L.S., Jett, J.R., Patten, C.A., Schroeder, D.R., Nirelli, L.M., et al. (2004). Effectiveness of smoking cessation self-help materials in a lung cancer screening population. Lung Cancer, 44(1), 13-21.
Cox, L.S., Patten, C.A., Ebbert, J.O., Drews, A.A., Croghan, G.A., Clark, M.M., et al. (2002). Tobacco use outcomes among patients with lung cancer treated for nicotine dependence. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(16), 3461-3469.
Cox, L.S., Sloan, J.A., Patten, C.A., Bonner, J.A., Geyer, S.M., McGinnis, W.L., et al. (2002). Smoking behavior of 226 patients with diagnosis of stage IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 11(6), 472-478.
Doherty, W.J., & Whitehead, D. (1986). The social dynamics of cigarette smoking: A family systems perspective. Family Process, 25(3), 453-459.
Falba, T.A., & Sindelar, J.L. (2008). Spousal concordance in health behavior change. Health Services Research, 43(1, Pt. 1), 96-116.
Henoch, I., Bergman, B., Gustafsson, M., Gaston-Johansson, F., & Danielson, E. (2007). The impact of symptoms, coping capacity, and social support on quality of life experience over time in patients with lung cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(4), 370-379.
Lewis, M.A., McBride, C.M., Pollack, K.I., Puleo, E., Butterfield, R.M., & Emmons, K.M. (2006). Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science and Medicine, 62(6), 1369-1380.
McBride, C.M., Emmons, K.M., & Lipkus, I.M. (2003). Understanding the potential of teachable moments: The case of smoking cessation. Health Education Research, 18(2), 156-170.
McBride, C.M., Pollack, K.I., Garst, J., Keefe, F., Lyna, P., Fish, L., et al. (2003). Distress and motivation for smoking cessation among lung cancer patients' relatives who smoke. Journal of Cancer Education, 18(3), 150-156.
Rohrbaugh, M.J., Shoham, V., Trost, S., Muramoto, M., Cate, R.M., & Leishchow, S. (2001). Couple dynamics of change-resistant smoking: Toward a family consultation model. Family Process, 40(1), 15-31.
Sarna, L. (1995). Smoking behaviors of women after diagnosis with lung cancer. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(1), 35-41.
Sarna, L., Brown, J.K., Cooley, M.E., Williams, R.D., Chernecky, C., Padilla, G., et al. (2005). Quality of life and meaning of illness of women with lung cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32(1), E9-E19. Retrieved April 1, 2009, from
http://ons.metapress.com/content/k412l1340546kw09/fulltext.pdf http://ons.metapress.com/content/k412l1340546kw09/fulltext.pdfSarna, L., Cooley, M.E., Brown, J.K., Williams, R.D., Chernecky, C., Padilla, G., et al. (2006). Quality of life and health status dyads of women with lung cancer and family members. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33(6), 1109-1116.
Shoham, V., Rohrbaugh, M.J., Trost, S.E., & Muramoto, M. (2006). A family consultation intervention for health-compromised smokers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(4), 395-402.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Walker, M.S., Larsen, R.J., Zona, D.M., Govindan, R., & Fisher, E.B. (2004). Smoking urges and relapse among patients with lung cancer: Findings from a preliminary retrospective study. Preventive Medicine, 39(3), 449-457.
Zang, E.A., & Wynder, E.L. (1996). Differences in lung cancer risk between men and women: Examination of the evidence. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88(3-4), 183-192.
