Article

Transformative Learning Theory: Facilitating Mammography Screening in Rural Women

Mary Anne Purtzer

Lindsey Overstreet

rural issues, prevention and detection, nursing research, qualitative research, breast cancer
ONF 2014, 41(2), 176-184. DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.176-184

Purpose/Objectives: To use transformative learning to investigate what experiences serve as catalysts for mammography screening, the cognitive and affective responses that result from the catalyst, and how screening behavior is impacted.

Research Approach: A descriptive qualitative study.

Setting: Southeastern Wyoming.

Participants: 25 low-income, rural women aged 40 years and older.

Methodologic Approach: Four focus group interviews.

Findings: Cancer experiences triggered universal responses of fear by screeners and nonscreeners. The manner in which that fear response was interpreted was a critical factor in the facilitation of, or impedance to, screening. Dichotomous interpretations of fear responses provided the context for screening behavior. Immobilizing and isolating experiences were associated with nonscreening behavior, whereas motivation and self-efficacy were associated with screening behavior.

Conclusions: Transformative learning theory is a useful framework from which to explain differences in mammography screening behavior. Creating opportunities that facilitate dialogue and critical reflection hold the potential to change immobilizing and isolating frames of reference in nonscreening women.

Interpretation: To help women transcend their fear and become self-efficacious, nurses can assess how cancer and the screening experience is viewed and, if indicated, move beyond standard education and offer opportunities for dialogue and critical reflection.

Jump to a section

    References

    Ackerson, K., & Preston, S.D. (2009). A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 1130-1140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04981.x
    Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluation and self-efficacy mechanism governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Policy, 45, 1017-1028.
    Burke, N.J., Joseph, G., Pasick, R.J., & Barker, J.C. (2009). Theorizing social context: Rethinking behavioral theory. Health Education and Behavior, 36(5, Suppl), 55S-70S. doi:10.1177/1090198109335338
    Cameron, L.D., Leventhal, H., & Love, R.R. (1998). Trait anxiety, symptom perceptions, and illness-related responses among women with breast cancer in remission during a tamoxifen clinical trial. Health Psychology, 17, 459-469.
    Carey, M.A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In J.M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Women aged 40+ who have had a mammogram within the past two years. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data (BRFSS). Retrieved from http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/list.asp?cat=WH&yr=2010&qkey=4421&state=All
    Champion, V., Maraj, M., Hui, S., Perkins, A.J., Tierney, W., Menon, U., & Skinner, C.S. (2003). Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Preventive Medicine, 36, 150-158.
    Champion, V., Skinner, C.S., & Menon, U. (2005). Development of a self-efficacy scale for mammography. Research in Nursing and Health, 28, 329-336.
    Champion, V.L., Skinner, C.S., Menon, U., Rawl, S., Giesler, R.B., Monahan, P., & Daggy, J. (2004). A breast cancer fear scale: Psychometric development. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 753-762. doi:10.1177/1359105304045383
    Champion, V.L., Skinner, C.S., Miller, A.M., Goulet, R.J., & Wagler, K. (1997). Factors influencing effect of mammography screening in a university workplace. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 21, 231-241.
    Consedine, N.S., Magai, C., Krivoshekova, Y.S., Ryzewicz, L., & Neugut, A.I. (2004). Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: A critical review. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention, 13, 501-510.
    Corcoran, J., Crowley, M., Bell, H., Murray, A., & Grindle, L. (2012). U.S. Latinas' knowledge and attitudes toward mammography: Meta-synthesis. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 22, 671-689. doi:10.1080/10911359.2012.655959
    Dubouloz, C.J., King, J., Paterson, B., Ashe, B., Chevrier, J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2010). A model of the process of transformation in primary care for people living with chronic illnesses. Chronic Illness, 6, 282-293. doi:10.1177/1742395310383340
    Findholt, N. (2010). The culture of rural communities: An examination of rural nursing concepts at the community level. In C.A. Winters & H.J. Lee (Eds.), Rural nursing concepts, theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 367-376). New York, NY: Springer.
    Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
    Melnyk, B.M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2009). Igniting a spirit of inquiry: An essential foundation for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing, 109(11), 49-52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000363354.53883.58
    Menon, U., Champion, V., Monahan, P.O., Daggy, J., Hui, S., & Skinner, C.S. (2007). Health Belief Model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21, 255-261. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-21.4.255
    Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63. doi:10.1177/1541344603252172
    Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Morrison-Beedy, D., Côté-Arsenault, D., & Feinstein, N.F. (2001). Maximizing results with focus groups: Moderator and analysis issues. Applied Nursing Research, 14, 48-53. doi:10.1053/apnr.2001.21081
    Pasick, R.J., & Burke, N.J. (2008). A critical review of theory in breast cancer screening promotion across cultures. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 351-368. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.143420
    Pellissier, J.M., & Venta, E.R. (1996). Introducing patient values into the decision-making process for breast cancer screening. Women and Health, 24(4), 47-67.
    Potter, P.A., & Perry, A.G. (2009). Fundamentals of nursing (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
    Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
    Pruitt, S.L., McQueen, A., Tiro, J.A., Rakowski, W., Diclemente, C.C., & Vernon, S.W. (2009). Construct validity of a mammography processes of change scale and invariance by stage of change. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 64-74. doi:10.1177/1359105309342305
    Purtzer, M.A. (2010). Processes inherent in mammography-screening decisions of rarely or never-screened women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 32, 199-217. doi:10.1177/0193945909350740
    Purtzer, M.A. (2012). A transformative decision-making process for mammography screening among rural, low-income women. Public Health Nursing, 29, 247-255. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.2011.00994.x
    Rakowski, W., Andersen, M.R., Stoddard, A.M., Urban, N., Rimer, B.K., Lane, D.S., … Costanza, M.E. (1997). Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychology, 16, 433-441.
    Rakowski W., Ehrich, B., Dubé, C.E., Pearlman, D.N., Goldstein, M.G., Peterson, K.K., … Woolverton, H. (1996). Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 91-100. doi:10.1007/BF02909581
    Rakowski, W., Ehrich, B., Goldstein, M.G., Rimer, B.K., Pearlman, D.N., Clark, M.A., … Woolverton, H. (1998). Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Preventive Medicine, 27, 748-756.
    Richards, L., & Morse, J.M. (2013). README FIRST for a user's guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    Rimer, B.K. (1994). Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 317-326.
    Skaggs, B.G., & Barron, C.R. (2006). Searching for meaning in negative events: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 559-570. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03761.x
    Sorensen, G., Emmons, K., Hunt, M.K., Barbeau, E., Goldman, R., Peterson, K., … Berkman, L. (2003). Model for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions: Applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populations. Preventive Medicine, 37, 188-197. doi:10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00111-7
    Spector, R.E. (2009). Cultural diversity in health and illness (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
    Ziner, K.W., Sledge, G.W., Bell, C.J., Johns, S., Miller, K.D., & Champion, V.L. (2012). Predicting fear of breast cancer recurrence and self-efficacy in survivors by age and diagnosis. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39, 287-295. doi:10.1188/12.ONF.287-295