Chiu, H.Y., Chiang, P.C., Miao, N.F., Lin, E.Y., & Tsai, P.S. (2014). The effects of mind-body interventions on sleep in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 75, 1215–1223.

PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care

The primary outcome was a change in a sleep parameters. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that MBIs had a medium effect size on the improvement of sleep quality, and this effect persisted up to three months after treatment. The weighted mean effect size was -0.43 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.62), and the long-term effect size (up to three months) was -0.29 (95% CI, -0.52 to -0.06). The sensitivity analysis revealed that MBIs had a significant effect on sleep (g = -0.33, p < 0.001). The moderating effects of components of the intervention, methodologic features, subject characteristics, and the quality of the studies on the relationship between MBIs and sleep were not found (all p values > 0.05). The main interventions used in included studies in which yoga and mindfulness-based stress reduction were employed. Some studies involved the use of meditation, hypnosis, or sleep hygiene interventions. Yoga interventions yielded an effect size similar to that of other individual interventions (g = -0.40, p = 0.71).

This meta-analysis suggested that MBIs yield a medium effect size on sleep quality, and its effects are maintained for up to three months.

Although there was a comprehensive review of the literature, the selection criteria may have limited the studies included in the review, and the search strategies may have influenced the articles obtained. Only RCTs with MBIs reporting improved sleep outcomes may have been published, and studies with negative results may have been missed, causing a publication bias. Analysis was only done across all studies, which had substantially different interventions, some of which included cognitive behavioral therapy, which is shown to be effective in sleep improvement. The validity of calculating results across studies with very different interventions is questionable. Different methods of measurement were used in some studies as well. The included studies all lacked attention control.

The findings of this meta-analysis support the implementation of MBIs into multimodal approaches to managing sleep quality in patients with cancer; however, it should be recognized that this pooled analysis was done across specific interventions that were very different from each other, and there are multiple limitations that affect the strength of these conclusions.