Gagnon, B., Murphy, J., Eades, M., Lemoignan, J., Jelowicki, M., Carney, S., . . . Macdonald, N. (2013). A prospective evaluation of an interdisciplinary nutrition-rehabilitation program for patients with advanced cancer. Current Oncology, 20, 310-318.  

To evaluate the degree to which a multi-component rehabilitation program improves symptom control and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer

The intervention was a 10-12 week program offered by a multidisciplinary team, consisting of nutritional counseling, a collaborative care plan based on patient goals, a palliative care physician specialist focused on symptom-related medical interventions, a pivot nurse for care coordination and case management, and an exercise component with semi-weekly exercise sessions with a physical therapist and a home exercise plan. Occupational therapy was provided and focused on self care, leisure, and productivity. Patients were assessed at baseline and during their final clinic visit at the end of the study.

• N = 131  
• MEAN AGE = 59.9 years (SD = 13.0 years)
• MALES: 50.4%, FEMALES: 49.6%
• KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: All had stage III and IV disease with a variety of primary tumor types including both hematologic and sold tumors.
• OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: 38% were on current chemotherapy; most had ECOG performance status of 1 or 2.

SITE: Single site  

SETTING TYPE: Outpatient  

LOCATION: McGill University Cancer Center, Montreal, Canada

Quasi-experimental

Change in symptom severity was analyzed and Cohen’s d was used to calculate effect size. Severity of depression from ESAS declined (p <. 0001, d = 0.7); anorexia declined (p < .0001, d = .4);  pain declined (p < .0001, d = .4); physical and general fatigue declined (p < .0001, d = .7); mental fatigue declined (p < .0005, d = .4); and level of distress and difficulty coping declined (p < .0001).

The multi-component rehabilitation program provided here resulted in a significant improvement in multiple symptoms and a reduction in distress and difficulty coping.

• Risk of bias (no control group)
• Risk of bias (no blinding)
• Risk of bias (no random assignment) 
• Risk of bias (no appropriate attentional control condition)  
• Unintended interventions or applicable interventions not described that would influence results
• Subject withdrawals ≥ 10%
• Other limitations/explanation: 30% of patients withdrew from the study–the majority of these were due to death or disease progression. No information is provided about medication changes over the course of the study that might affect outcomes measured. The report states some different results in the body of the article versus tables provided.

A multi-component, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation and palliative care program can provide effective improvement of multiple symptoms in patients with advanced disease.