Acupuncture is a method of producing analgesia or altering the function of a body system by inserting fine, wire-thin needles (about the diameter of a strand of hair) into acupoints along a specific meridian (meridians are channels in the body that transport energy). Electroacupuncture involves the application of a pulsating electrical current to acupuncture needles to stimulate the acupoint via an electrode that is attached to the acupuncture needles. The electrical current substitutes for maneuvering the needles by hand. The P6 acupuncture point is most commonly used for nausea and vomiting. Acupuncture and electroacupuncture have been evaluated for their effects on anxiety, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, pain, depression, lymphedema, hot flashes, sleep–wake disturbances, peripheral neuropathy, and fatigue in patients with cancer.
Chao, L.F., Zhang, A.L., Liu, H.E., Cheng, M.H., Lam, H.B., & Lo, S.K. (2009). The efficacy of acupoint stimulation for the management of therapy-related adverse events in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 118, 255–267.
To scrutinize the evidence of using acupoint stimulation (APS) by any modality on managing adverse events related to anticancer therapies in patients with breast cancer
English databases searched were PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and PsycINFO.
Chinese databases searched were CNKI, CEPS, and WanFang as well as manual searching.
Search keywords were medical terms of breast cancer (e.g., breast neoplasm, breast carcinoma, breast tumor) combined separately with at least one of the following: acupuncture, acupressure, auricular acupuncture, ear acupuncture, acupuncture points, electroacupuncture, acupoint, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, moxibustion.
Studies were included if they
Studies were excluded if they were
Initial review involved 843 titles and abstracts and 51 full-text articles. Of those, 26 studies were included in the report.
Study evaluation began with two independent reviewers using a modified Jadad scale, assessing 3 aspects: randomization procedure (2 points); dropout and withdrawal discussion (1 point); and blinding (2 points). Studies were classified as high quality if they attained a score of 3 or higher.
Evaluated literature included 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight controlled clinical trials published between 1999 and 2008. Nine trials included conventional acupuncture, 6 included electroacupuncture, 5 included drug injection in acupoints, 3 included self-acupressure, and 3 included acupoint stimulation by wristbands or acumagnet. Eighteen were in English, and 8 were in Chinese.
Nine of the 26 studies were rated as high quality. Adverse effects (outcomes) of the APS included vasomotor syndrome, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), post-mastectomy pain, joint symptoms, lymphedema, leukopenia, and adverse events.
Eleven studies investigated CINV and APS with acupoints P6 and ST36. Ten of the CINV studies reported APS significantly improved emesis caused by breast cancer therapy.
The most common outcome evaluated by APS in the studies was CINV. APS was noted to be effective in reducing acute emesis caused by breast cancer therapy. Authors reported that APS is beneficial in the management of CINV, especially in the acute phase.
Healthcare providers should consider using APS as an option for the management of CINV.
Cheon, S., Zhang, X., Lee, I.S., Cho, S.H., Chae, Y., & Lee, H. (2014). Pharmacopuncture for cancer care: A systematic review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014, 804746.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment (for CINV trials)
All studies favored pharmacopuncture over the control group, but outcome measures varied. Five out of six studies reported response rates as an outcome measure. Two studies calculated response rate using emesis episodes. One study (26) used two outcome measures, the total number of emesis episodes in 21 days and the proportion of emesis-free days in the same period.
The level of evidence was not strong enough to draw any conclusions. There was a careful suggestion that pharmacopuncture may help alleviate cancer-related pain, CINV, and other symptoms such as ileus, hiccups, fever, quality of life, and gastrointestinal disturbances.
The findings of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with consideration of its limitations. Additional rigorously designed and conducted studies are required.
Collins, K.B., & Thomas, D.J. (2004). Acupuncture and acupressure for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 16(2), 80-84.
To review existing research on the use of acupuncture and acupressure in the management of nausea and vomiting in order to provide nurses the information required to assist their patients receiving chemotherapy and experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Databases searched were described as scientific and internet sources, Institutes of Health Consensus statement, and federal regulations.
Search keywords included acupuncture and acupressure in combination with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Numerous studies tested the effectiveness of acupressure, acupuncture, and the combination. Few focused on acupressure alone for managing CINV.
A total of five studies were found, representing a total of 409 patients.
Very few studies were found, but, overall, results indicated improvement in nausea and vomiting, supporting the use of acupressure and acupuncture of the treatment of CINV. Acupuncture and acupressure were found to be safe and effective for the relief of CINV in combination with current antiemetic drugs.
The sample sizes were small in the studies; therefore, determining applicability to various practice settings and populations is difficult.
Ezzo, J., Vickers, A., Richardson, M.A., Allen, C., Dibble, S.L., Issell, B., … Zhang, G. (2005). Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 7188-7198.
Database searched was MEDLINE (1966-Dec 2003).
Search keywords were acupuncture, alternative medicine, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, “injections, intramuscular”, “Medicine, Traditional Chinese”, acupressure, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and TENS. These were combined with nausea, vomiting, emesis, antiemetic therapy, and antineoplastic agents/adverse effects.
Studies were included in the review if they
Studies were excluded from the review if they had a high possibility of bias.
In all, 14 studies were identified and reviewed.
In the nine studies that evaluated acute vomiting management via acupuncture-point stimulation, acute vomiting was reduced but nausea severity was not.
In the seven studies that assessed acute nausea via acupressure, acute nausea severity was reduced.
Three studies that evaluated delayed vomiting did not support the intervention.
In the five studies using acupuncture-point stimulation, the intervention did not reduce delayed vomiting.
The pooled results of 11 studies using acupuncture-point stimulation plus antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) showed significant reduction in acute vomiting and marginal statistical significance for reducing acute nausea.
Electroacupuncture provided protective effects for acute vomiting, but acupuncture did not. Acupressure was effective for acute nausea in patients using “state-of-the-art” antiemetics. However, placebo effects may have influenced results.
Garcia, M. K., McQuade, J., Haddad, R., Patel, S., Lee, R., Yang, P., . . . Cohen, L. (2013). Systematic review of acupuncture in cancer care: a synthesis of the evidence. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 952–960.
To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture for symptom control in patients with cancer.
Databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, and PubMed through December 2011.
Search keywords were acupuncture, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, Chinese medicine, Asian medicine, and keywords that included cancer and cancer symptoms.
Studies were included in the review if they
Studies were excluded from the review if they
In total, 3,494 references were retrieved and evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Studies addressed potential management of the following symptoms:
The strongest evidence that the study produced showed that acupuncture may be effective for the management of CINV. The study did not show acupuncture to be efficacious in the treatment of other symptoms.
The studies included were of low quality.
Available evidence, which was limited, did not support the claim that acupuncture is effective in alleviating various adverse symptoms in adults with cancer. Additional research is needed to determine the efficacy. The findings of this analysis suggested that patients with uncontrolled CINV may be appropriate candidates for acupuncture referral. For the treatment of other symptoms, the efficacy is undetermined.
Mayer, D.J. (2000). Acupuncture: An evidence-based review of the clinical literature. Annual Review of Medicine, 51, 49-63.
MEDLINE was searched for the 14 medical conditions for which the National Institutes of Health Acupuncture Consensus Development Panel (NIHCDP) concluded acupuncture was effective or could be useful. The two conditions in which acupuncture was found to be effective are the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and postoperative nausea and vomiting. The remaining 12 conditions reviewed in the article were the effect of acupuncture on pain and the treatment of other conditions (e.g., addiction, stroke rehabilitation, and asthma).
Three of the studies reviewed examined the effect of P6 acupuncture on CINV. Although the chemotherapy agents were variable and various carcinomas were studied, strong evidence supported the use of acupuncture for greater antiemetic effect than antiemetics alone.
Evidence supports the use of acupuncture in the treatment of CINV and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Miller, M., & Kearney, N. (2004). Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting—Past reflections, present practice and future management. European Journal of Cancer Care, 13(1), 71-81.
Support for the use of nonpharmacologic interventions for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) was weak.
Many studies were flawed because of small sample sizes and confounding variables (e.g., stage of disease, various chemotherapy regimens, culture, patient compliance).
Preliminary available evidence suggests positive benefits through nonpharmacologic techniques; however, larger randomized trials are needed to demonstrate the exact benefits, including economic.
Silva, D.R.F., dos Reis, P.E.D., Gomes, I.P., Funghetto, S.S., & Ponce de Leon, C.G.R.M. (2009). Non pharmacological interventions for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomits: Integrative review. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 8(1).
To identify the evidence in scientific literature related to nonpharmacologic interventions for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Databases searched were Cochrane, PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACSO), and Brazilian Nursing Database (BDENF).
Search keywords were nausea, vomiting, chemotherapy, nursing care, cursing care protocols for cancer chemotherapy, and chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting.
Studies were included in the review if they
This review demonstrated no substantial effects among the interventions included. Findings regarding the use of acupuncture, acupressure, and electroacupuncture were mixed. Most studies using acupuncture and acupressure involved use of the p6 point on the wrist.
This review included a limited number of studies.
The evidence does not demonstrate significant effect of these interventions for CINV. However, these interventions may be useful as adjuncts to pharmacologic treatment. Nonpharmacologic interventions appear to be most effective in the prevention of acute vomiting rather than symptoms of nausea.
Tan, J.Y., Molassiotis, A., Wang, T., & Suen, L.K. (2014). Current evidence on auricular therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014, 430796.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
APPLICATIONS: Pediatrics and elder care
This review was a helpful starting point to spur more research on the use of AT for the management of CINV. There was significant heterogeneity among the trials, but there appeared to be encouraging results for the use of AT to justify additional research. To better answer the question about AT's benefit, well-designed, randomized, controlled trials will be needed. From the information presented, it appears that AT may have a role in the management of delayed CINV, which can be challenging to manage and very troublesome for patients.
The investigators were only able to evaluate English and Chinese studies, which may have prevented the review of other studies such as Korean trials.
Encouraging results were identified about the adjunct use of AT for CINV, but this review demonstrated the need for well-designed trials incorporating AT with antiemetic regimens for acute and delayed CINV. The trials need to incorporate standard AT points, standard pressing length at each point, and a standard CINV assessment scale. Patient compliance also should be assessed and documented.
Choo, S.P., Kong, K.H., Lim, W.T., Gao, F., Chua, K., & Leong, S.S. (2006). Electroacupuncture for refractory acute emesis caused by chemotherapy. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 12, 963-969.
To evaluate the use of electroacupuncture in preventing anthracycline-based chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting (CINV) refractory to combination 5-HT3-antagonist and dexamethasone
Patients received electroacupuncture in addition to standard antiemetic prophylaxis. Acupuncture was started 10 minutes prior to start of chemotherapy infusion and then continued for an additional 20 minutes. The P6 acupuncture point was used, a second needle was inserted at a different point, and electrical stimulation was delivered.
This was a prospective trial.
Melchart, D., Ihbe-Heffinger, A., Leps, B., von Schilling, C., & Linde, K. (2006). Acupuncture and acupressure for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea: A randomised cross-over pilot study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14, 878-882.
To study the effectiveness of acupuncture and acupressure in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea
Patients were treated for one cycle of chemotherapy with acupuncture and acupressure at point P6 and for one cycle at a close sham point. Participants were randomized to acupuncture at P6 or at a close nonacupuncture point, and it was delivered by one of two physicians with training and experience in acupuncture. Participants wore acupressure bands for 72 hours at the same points on both arms and could wear them for an additional four days if needed. The bands were covered with a mull bandage to blind the staff. Participants completed diaries for seven days, documenting intensity (on a 0-6 rating scale), frequency, and duration of nausea and vomiting; additional antiemetics taken; and, on day 7, rate the effectiveness of side effects or impairment by acupuncture or acupressure. Patients completed the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE). Oncology staff checked that the diaries were completed accurately, standard antiemetics regimens were followed, and if any adverse reactions related to acupuncture occurred.
The study was conducted by the hematology and gastroenterology departments of a large university hospital in Germany.
This was a randomized, crossover pilot study.
Rithirangsriroj, K., Manchana, T., & Akkayagorn, L. (2015). Efficacy of acupuncture in prevention of delayed chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in gynecologic cancer patients. Gynecologic Oncology, 136, 82–86.
To compare the efficacy of ondansetron versus acupuncture in the prevention of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Patients were randomized to receive acupuncture (applied to wrists) or ondansetron (8 mg IV for 30 minutes) before chemotherapy. Acupuncture also was applied the day after chemotherapy. All patients received dexamethasone at 5 mg orally twice per day for three days following chemotherapy. Ondansetron at 4 mg was administered orally every 12 hours for vomiting. During subsequent chemotherapy infusions, patients received the other intervention in a crossover design. Data on CINV were collected for five days after the administration of chemotherapy, and quality-of-life data were collected on the seventh day following chemotherapy.
Randomized, crossover study
Patients in the intervention group had a higher rate of complete response for delayed CINV (p = 0.02), less delayed nausea (p = 0.004), lower nausea scores (p < 0.001), and fewer doses of additional ondansetron (p = 0.002). Fewer patients reported adverse side effects when receiving acupuncture. Forty patients reported that they preferred acupuncture to ondansetron.
Acupuncture was effective in the prevention of delayed CINV and nausea. Patients receiving acupuncture also required fewer doses of ondansetron during the delayed phase of CINV.
Although additional research with a larger and more diverse sample is needed, the use of acupuncture to manage CINV could represent an effective nursing intervention for patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
Shen, J., Wenger, N., Glaspy, J., Hays, R.D., Albert, P.S., Choi, C., & Shekelle, P.G. (2000). Electroacupuncture for control of myeloablative chemotherapy-induced emesis: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 284, 2755-2761.
To compare the effectiveness of electroacupuncture, minimal needling and mock electrical stimulation, or antiemetic medications alone in controlling emesis among patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups.
Participants were from an inpatient unit at a tertiary hospital with a comprehensive cancer center. Patients were recruited from oncology clinics.
The study design was random, without stratification.
Investigators recorded the total number of emetic episodes during the five-day study period and the proportion of emesis-free days across the treatment groups.
Tas, D., Uncu, D., Sendur, M.A., Koca, N., & Zengin, N. (2014). Acupuncture as a complementary treatment for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15, 3139–3144.
To investigate the effects of acupuncture on nausea, vomiting, pain, sleep quality, and anxiety in patients who were hospitalized or undergoing chemotherapy
Acupuncture was given for three days. On the day of hospitalization and after three days, study assessments were completed. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) was not measured in patients receiving chemotherapy for the first time.
The sign test was used to show the pre- and post-treatment significance of differences, and these were shown for all symptoms (p < 0.001). However, the pretreatment score for insomnia was equal to one before and after treatment, and a larger proportion of patients did not improve (57.8%) than improved (42.2%) in terms of sleep quality. In other symptoms, the percentage that improved was similar to the percentage that did not improve. The intervention group appeared to have the greatest number of patients whose nausea improved.
Acupuncture may be a useful adjunctive therapy for the management of pain, CINV, anxiety, and insomnia in hospitalized patients receiving chemotherapy. The design of this study limits the strength of its findings.
Acupuncture is a complementary therapy that may be beneficial as an adjunct treatment for symptom management in patients with cancer. This individual study has multiple limitations, and additional evidence is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture.
Xie, J., Chen, L.H., Ning, Z.Y., Zhang, C.Y., Chen, H., Chen, Z., . . . Zhu, X.Y. (2017). Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with palonosetron on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Chinese Journal of Cancer, 36, 6-016-0176-1.
To investigate the effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
Patients receiving chemotherapy via an infusion to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization were randomized to an active or placebo acupuncture group. Prior to chemotherapy, all patients received IV palonosetron. Patients received acupuncture 1–2 hours before chemotherapy, and more just after chemotherapy. Acupuncture was continued twice daily for six days. In the sham acupuncture group, electrodes were placed on the same acupoints for the same length of time and frequency, but no electrical stimulation was given. Severity and frequency of nausea and vomiting were recorded in patient diaries daily. P6, L14, and ST36 acupoints were used.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, controlled trial
No significant differences in CINV existed between groups. Anorexia was lower in the active acupuncture group from the second day onward (p < 0.0002).
Electroacupuncture was not shown to have an effect on CINV but appeared to have benefit for reducing anorexia.
Electroacupuncture was not effective in reducing CINV in this study but appeared to have a positive effect on appetite. Additional research is needed to determine any potential role of acupuncture for anorexia in patients with cancer.
Zhang, X., Jin, H.F., Fan, Y.H., Lu, B., Meng, L.N., & Chen, J.D. (2014). Effects and mechanisms of transcutaneous electroacupuncture on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014, 860631.
To evaluate transcutaneous electroacupuncture (TEA) on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) as well as serotonin and dopamine levels among patients with cancer
Randomized, controlled trial
Vomiting was significantly improved in the treatment group compared to the control group at 48 hours only (p = 0.046). No difference was noted at 24 hours (p = 0.9) or 72 hours (p = 0.68). Nausea was significantly better for the treatment group than the control group at 48 hours (p = 0.001) and 72 hours (p = 0.025) but not at 24 hours. Serotonin and dopamine were not different at baseline but were significantly reduced in the treatment group when compared to the control group at 48 hours (p = 0.03) and 72 hours (p = 0.02). No safety issues were noted in any patients. Laboratory results and EKG tests were normal.
Transcutaneous electroacupuncture was effective at improving delayed nausea and vomiting and had no significant safety issues.
The needleless system of transcutaneous electroacupuncture made administration easy and compliance rates high.
Greenlee, H., Balneaves, L.G., Carlson, L.E., Cohen, M., Deng, G., Hershman, D., . . . Society for Integrative Oncology. (2014). Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute.Monographs, 2014, 346–358.
4,900 references were identified that were published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2013. 203 articles were included in the final review although only 174 were referenced. Grades used and reported here were A: recommended, high certainty of benefit, B: recommended, high certainty of moderate to substantial benefit, D: recommends against use, moderate to high certainty of no net benefit, and H: recommends against use, moderate to high certainty that harms outweigh benefits.
Interventions for specific symptoms that had strong recommendations for or against use were:
It appears that only specific types of interventions were included, and there are numerous types of integrative or complementary interventions that were not considered in this review. The findings considered were limited to women with breast cancer. Quality rating of evidence was not discussed individually.
These guidelines provided an evidence-based evaluation of various integrative therapies in women with breast cancer. This set of interventions is not all-inclusive; however, it does provide some guidance to clinicians and others regarding evidence strength in these areas as assessed by this specific study group.