Kroz, M., Fink, M., Reif, M., Grobbecker, S., Zerm, R., Quetz, M., . . . Gutenbrunner, C. (2013). Multimodal therapy concept and aerobic training in breast cancer patients with chronic cancer-related fatigue. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 12, 301–311.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To investigate the feasibility and effects of a multimodal intervention for fatigue compared to home-based aerobic exercise

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Individuals selected which intervention they wanted—home exercise or the multimodal intervention. The multimodal intervention included psychoeducation, including mindfulness-based techniques, sleep education regarding sleep hygiene, restriction and stimulus control, eurythmy therapy involving mind-body exercises, and medicine-oriented painting therapy. Those in the exercise group were asked to carry out 30-minute sessions three to five times weekly. Those in the multimodal group had 225 minutes of activity once weekly over 10 weeks, led by specialists in that therapy. Baseline and follow-up study measures were obtained within three weeks prior to starting the study and within three weeks after completion.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 28 
  • MEAN AGE = 57 years
  • MALES: 0.5%, FEMALES: 99.5%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: All had breast cancer. On average, patients were three years out from initial diagnosis and treatment.
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Approximately half were employed. All had a fatigue score of at least four and had fatigue for at least six months.

Setting

  • SITE: Single site 
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient 
  • LOCATION: Germany

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Late effects and survivorship

Study Design

  • Observational two-group pilot study

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS-D) (scale of affective, physical, and cognitive fatigue)
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
  • Satisfaction with intervention on five-point Likert scale

Results

Those in the multimodal group showed a significant reduction in physical fatigue (p = .0342, mean change = -2.1). Those in the multimodal group had a significant improvement in global sleep quality (p = .041, mean change = -2.0).

Conclusions

A multicomponent intervention was seen to be feasible and had a positive impact on rating of physical fatigue and global sleep quality.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 30)
  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)
  • Risk of bias (no appropriate attentional control condition)
  • Other limitations/explanation: Adherence to home-based exercise is not known.

Nursing Implications

A holistic multicomponent approach to manage patient fatigue and sleep disruption may have greater benefit than interventions that only incorporate exercise. Further research is needed to determine what type and intervention components are most effective.