Lindemalm, C., Mozaffari, F., Choudhury, A., Granstam-Björneklett, H., Lekander, M., Nilsson, B., . . . Mellstedt, H. (2008). Immune response, depression and fatigue in relation to support intervention in mammary cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16, 57–65.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To examine the effect of a support intervention on immune function and levels of depression, anxiety, and fatigue in patients with breast cancer after completion of surgery and adjuvant treatment

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

A total of 41 women were chosen from an ongoing prospective randomized study. The first patients in each stratum of treatment were chosen for current study. Twenty-one women received adjuvant combined radio-chemotherapy (CT-RT), and 20 women received radiotherapy (RT). Eleven CT-RT patients and 10 RT patients were randomized to the support group, while 10 CT-RT and 10 RT patients served as controls. The support intervention consisted of educational lectures about cancer etiology, risk factors, treatment, psychological and physical effects, and coping. Exercise, relaxation training, qigong, and art therapy were also included. The intervention was provided for one week and then for another four days two months later. Study measures were obtained at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study reported on a sample of 41 patients with breast cancer (100% female).
  • Patient age range was 56–69 years.
  • Most patients were receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Setting

  • Single site
  • Outpatient setting
  • Vasteras Hospital, Sweden

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Patients were in the transition phase after initial treatment.

Study Design

A randomized controlled trial design was used.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale    
  • Norwegian Fatigue Questionnaire
  • Immune Analysis

Results

There was no significant immune effect from the support intervention. More patients in the support group had higher anxiety scores at the start of the intervention compared to the nonsupport group. The mean value anxiety score in the support group was also higher compared to the nonsupport group and improved significantly over time. Low levels of depression were reported in both groups, with no significant difference in depression scores. There was no significant difference in fatigue, but fatigue significantly improved over time in all patients. There were no significant differences in study measures between groups.

Conclusions

The support intervention had no effect on depression or immune parameters. There was no difference in improvement of anxiety and fatigue over time associated with the intervention.

Limitations

  • The study had a small sample, with less than 100 participants.
  • The sample had low depression scores at baseline.
  • It is not clear how the intervention was provided, whether individually, in groups, in the home, or in some other setting. 
  • The study had no blinding.

Nursing Implications

Findings do not support effectiveness of the intervention tested here. Results show that depression, anxiety, and fatigue improved significantly over time.