Lower, E. E., Fleishman, S., Cooper, A., Zeldis, J., Faleck, H., Yu, Z., & Manning, D. (2009). Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 38(5), 650–662.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

The study's primary aim was to evaluate the potential therapeutic effect and safety of dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) in the treatment of patients with chemotherapy-related fatigue. Its secondary aim was to examine the impact of d-MPH on cognitive functioning.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Participants were randomized to a placebo group or an intervention group receiving 5 mg of d-MPH twice daily (10 mg/day total).

Sample Characteristics

  • The total number of participants was 154.
  • There were 76 participants in the intervention group and 78 in the placebo group.
  • The average participant age was 52.8 ± 9.3 years.
  • 94.7% of the participants were female and 5.3% were male.
  • The majority of participants had breast or ovarian cancer. 

Setting

The study took place across 24 academic and community-based cancer centers.

Study Design

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Cognitive measures were taken with the

  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for global cognitive functioning
  • High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen (HSCS) for memory, language, attention, concentration, visual motor, spatial awareness, and self-regulation
  • Modified Swanson, Nelson and Pelham Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Scale (SNAP).

Other measures were taken with the

  • ICD-10 Criteria for fatigue
  • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression
  • Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S) for severity of illness
  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) for chronic illness and quality of life specific to fatigue symptoms
  • ECOG performance status for general well-being. Scores range from 0 (indicating perfect health with no restriction of activities) to 5 (indicating death).

Results

The primary outcome of focus was fatigue. Participants treated with d-MPH had significant improvement in fatigue symptoms at week 8 on the FACIT-F (p = 0.02) and on the CGI-S (p = 0.02). The d-MPH treatment group had higher drug-related events (63% vs. 28%) and greater discontinuation of medication (11% vs. 1.3%) than the placebo group. Cognitive function was not significantly improved.

Conclusions

d-MPH can be of benefit in the treatment of fatigue. However, results do not support d-MPH-mediated reduction in cognitive impairment in adult patients with cancer after chemotherapy.

Limitations

  • The study was underpowered to determine an effect on cognitive functioning.
  • HSCS has been reported to be susceptible to practice effects and therefore may have underestimated the level of cognitive impairment in participants.
  • The small number of men and the fact that most participants had diagnoses of breast or ovarian cancer limit generalizability.