Matthews, E.E., Berger, A.M., Schmiege, S.J., Cook, P.F., McCarthy, M.S., Moore, C.M., & Aloia, M.S. (2014). Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia outcomes in women after primary breast cancer treatment: A randomized, controlled trial. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41, 241–253. 

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To examine the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on sleep-wake outcomes in breast cancer survivors

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Women who met criteria for chronic insomnia and had completed breast cancer treatment randomly were assigned to CBT intervention or a placebo behavioral intervention. Individual, weekly CBT sessions consisted of education, stimulus control, sleep hygiene education, and cognitive therapy provided by an advanced practice nurse with specialized training. The placebo intervention was based on desensitization therapy that had been used in previous insomnia trials as a placebo treatment. For both groups, sessions 1, 3, and 6 were provided in person, and sessions 4 and 5 were provided by telephone. Sessions were audiotaped and independently reviewed by a CBT therapist to ensure fidelity. Women were evaluated at three- and six-month follow-ups.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 56
  • MEAN AGE = 52 years
  • FEMALES:100%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: All had breast cancer and were 1–36 months post-initial treatment. Most had previous radiation and chemotherapy.
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: The majority were Caucasian, well educated, and employed part- or full-time.

Setting

  • SITE: Single site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient
  • LOCATION: Colorado

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Late effects and survivorship

Study Design

  • Randomized, single-blind RCT with attention control

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Sleep diary
  • Piper Fatigue Scale
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
  • Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep (DBAS-16)
  • Patient knowledge test
  • ISI measure of perceived insomnia
  • Attentional function index
  • EORTC-QLQ-C30

Results

The CBT group did not show a significantly greater improvement in sleep outcomes immediately after the intervention, but scores were significantly better by the follow-up period (p = .003). Sleep efficiency increased by more than 11% in the CBT group, compared to an increase of 6.34% in the control group (d = 0.63). Sleep latency also improved more in the CBT group (d = 0.48, p = .007). No differences between groups were found for anxiety, depression, or fatigue.

Conclusions

Findings show that patients receiving CBT for sleep improved several sleep outcomes compared to individuals receiving a control intervention. The intervention did not demonstrate an effect on anxiety, depression, or fatigue.

Limitations

  • Small sample (less than 100)
  • Findings not generalizable
  • Other limitations/explanation: The sample had little diversity. The average baseline scores suggested that patients did not have clinically relevant levels of anxiety or depression.
 

Nursing Implications

Results of this study provide evidence of a moderate and significant effect of CBT on sleep outcomes among breast cancer survivors. This adds to the body of evidence that suggests effectiveness of this approach in managing sleep-wake disturbances.