van der Meulen, I.C., May, A.M., de Leeuw, J.R., Koole, R., Oosterom, M., Hordijk, G.J., & Ros, W.J. (2014). Long-term effect of a nurse-led psychosocial intervention on health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Cancer, 110, 593–601. 

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To report on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and depressive outcomes from an earlier trial using nurse counseling after intervention (NUCAI)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Nurses delivered as many as six 45–60 minutes sessions every two months. The sessions consisted of six components: completing a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale before each session to lead a discussion of current mental state, having a discussion of current physical problems, having a discussion of life functioning, providing the AFTER (Adjustment to Fear, Threat, or Expectation of Recurrence) intervention, providing general medical assistance, and referring patients to psychological care. The AFTER intervention had four components: expressing fear of recurrence, identifying beliefs about recurrence, evaluating self-examinations, reducing excessive checking behavior, and relaxation. Usual care was provided twice monthly in sessions about complications and monitoring for recurrence. Patients were referred for psychological aftercare if psychosocial problems were assessed.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 179  
  • MEAN AGE = 60.1 years (intervention), 60.7 years (control)
  • MALES: 70%, FEMALES: 30%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Intervention type of cancer: 23% larynx, 47% oral cavity, 18% OP, and 13% hypopharynx; control type of cancer: 24% larynx, 19% oral cavity, 48% OP, and 8% hypopharynx; intervention tumor stage: I–II 58% and III–IV 42%; control tumor stage: I–II 59% and III–IV 40% 
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Working status intervention: employed 35%, unemployed 33%, retired 22%, and unknown 10%; working status control: employed 37%, unemployed 37%, retired 23%, and unknown 2%

Setting

  • SITE: Single site    
  • SETTING TYPE: Not specified    
  • LOCATION: Utrecht, Netherlands

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Transition phase after active treatment

Study Design

Single, blinded, randomized, controlled trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Questionnaires were completed at baseline before cancer treatment and at three, six, nine, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment completion.
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck (EORTC QLQ-C30 H&N 35)
  • Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
  • Demographic and medical information collection

Results

50% of patients were lost to follow-up, the majority of which were because of death or terminal disease. At 12 months, statistically significant differences in physical functioning, emotional functioning, pain, swallowing, social contact, opening the mouth, coughing, and depressive symptoms were present. At 18 months, statistically significant differences in global quality of life, role functioning, emotional functioning, pain, swallowing, opening mouth, and depressive symptoms were present. At 24 months, statistically significant differences in emotional functioning and fatigue were present. Appointments were difficult to complete at times because of the clinic environment.

Conclusions

The NUCAI showed significant improvements for patients with head and neck cancer 24 months after completing treatment.

Limitations

  • Risk of bias (no blinding)
  • Intervention expensive, impractical, or training needs
  • Subject withdrawals ≥ 10% 
  • Other limitations/explanation: High attrition rate because of disease state; several analyses of data; fatigue measured as one aspect of multicomponent quality of life

Nursing Implications

As a nurse-led intervention, this is a feasible option for patients with head and neck cancer desiring a problem-focused intervention for symptoms.