Ferreira, J.N., Correia, L.R.B.R., Oliveira, R.M., Watanabe, S.N., Possari, J.F., & Lima, A.F.C. (2017). Managing febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients: An integrative review of the literature. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem, 70, 1301–1308.

STUDY PURPOSE: Analyzing interventions for management of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with cancer.

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

DATABASES USED: LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), BVS (Virtual Library of Health), PubMed, CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Web of Science

YEARS INCLUDED: 2010-2015

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Primary articles published in English, Portugese, or Spanish, articles with methodology demonstrating interventions related to the management of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients, published between 2010-2015, full-text article availability in the selected databases

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 2,892 articles

EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Duplicate articles were first removed from the original 2,892 articles retrieved, followed by elimination of articles that did not cover the research topic, and then finally articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were removed from the original sample.

• FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED: 12 
• TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW: Information not included in the article
• SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: Adult patients treated for both hematologic and oncologic malignancies with chemotherapy who developed febrile neutropenia during some course of treatment, use of growth factors in this population in some studies as well 
• KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Adult patients with cancer being treated with chemotherapy, development of febrile neutropenia, treatment with various pharmacologic treatment

PHASE OF CARE: Active anti-tumor treatment

Prophylactic use of colony stimulating factors in patients was effective in avoiding reduction of chemotherapy doses and cycle delays. One of the studies cited use of piperacillin/tazobactam as effective treatment for febrile neutropenia while another one compared ciprofloxacin and cefepime, noting cefepime to be more effective. Neither study reviewed by authors presented a strong case for one antibiotic treatment over another. There were some studies included citing use of biomarkers to classify febrile neutropenia risk in patients and treat prophylactically for those at high risk in the outpatient setting.

Based on the review of these 12 studies, it is evident that the prophylactic use of growth stimulating factors in patients with cancer limits episodes of febrile neutropenia, particularly in diseases such as breast cancer and lymphoma where febrile neutropenia is well documented. There was not a general consensus that could be made for a specific antimicrobial treatment for these patients as many studies cited different medications that deemed effective for patients. Authors note lack of interdisciplinary literature regarding febrile neutropenia guidelines.

• Limited search
• Limited number of studies included

Authors cite the need to have nurses, as well as pharmacists and other members of the interdisciplinary team, involved in development of guidelines and protocols as all members of the team treat these patients and need to be knowledgeable about febrile neutropenia.