Cabrera-Jaime, S., Martinez, C., Ferro-Garcia, T., Giner-Boya, P., Icart-Isern, T., Estrada-Masllorens, J.M., & Fernandez-Ortega, P. (2018). Efficacy of Plantago major, chlorhexidine 0.12% and sodium bicarbonate 5% solution in the treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients with solid tumour: A feasibility randomised triple-blind phase III clinical trial. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 32, 40–47.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To evaluate/compare three treatments for oral mucositis: (1) Plantago major extract mouthwash, (2) chlorhexidine 0.12%, and (3) aqueous solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate for  the treatment of oral mucositis in patients with solid tumors. Evaluation points included healing time, pain, oral intake, and quality of life.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Randomized controlled trial (phase 3)

  • Group A: Control group, received standard of care which included sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution with an additional dose of sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution. 
  • Group B: Experimental group, received sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution plus Plantago major extract
  • Group C: Experimental group, received sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution plus chlorhexidine 0.12%

The treatment was 14 days for all groups. All groups received education regarding the management of mucositis, a set of instructions, a diary to record signs and symptoms of mucositis, and instruction for proper storing of the mouthwashes. All participants were instructed to rinse with 8 ml of solution for two minutes every six hours. They were instructed to leave 15 minutes between the two mouthwashes.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 50 (evaluable)   
  • AGE: Mean age = 59.5 years (SD = 14.3)
  • MALES: 48%  
  • FEMALES: 52%
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Chemotherapy
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Tumor types: breast (30.6%), colorectal (32.7%), lung (14.3%), gastric (8.2%) and other (14.2%)
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Patients had a mean of 3.6 (SD = 3.2) chemotherapy cycles prior to oral mucositis outbreak. Patients received many different chemotherapy drugs. No participants developed neutropenia.

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: Spain

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active anti-tumor treatment
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care, palliative care

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; investigators, participants, care providers, and statistician were all blinded.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • WHO mucositis scale
  • Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain intensity
  • Intake capacity was captured by asking the participants if they could tolerated liquids only or liquids and solids. 
  • European Organizsation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
  • CBC (evaluation of neutropenia)
  • Patient diary

Results

  • Healing time: No statistical difference between groups. The group that used the double 5% sodium bicarbonate solution did have a shorter time to heal by two days, which may be clinically significant. 
  • Pain intensity: No significant difference
  • Oral intake capacity: No significant difference
  • Quality of life: No significant difference

Conclusions

In this small group, there is no advantage in using a chlorhexidine or Plantago major extract mouthwash in comparison to a double sodium bicarbonate solution. The latter is likely less expensive and more readily available

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Findings not generalizable
  • Subject withdrawals ≥ 10%
  • Other limitations/explanation: Not generalizable to those patients who become neutropenic or patients with non-solid tumors. Potentially some bias as there was self-reporting of oral intake versus an objective measure. Attrition rate 16% (failure to follow through with monitoring, interruption of the intervention)

Nursing Implications

This study does not support the use of Plantago major or chlorhexidine mouthwashes over double doses of sodium bicarbonate 5% aqueous solution.