Oyama, K., Fushida, S., Kaji, M., Takeda, T., Kinami, S., Hirono, Y., . . . Ohta, T. (2013). Aprepitant plus granisetron and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin. Journal of Gastroenterology, 48, 1234–1241.

DOI Link

Study Purpose

Evaluate the efficacy of new antiemetic combination (aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone) in gastric cancer patients’ receiving chemotherapy regimen (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and 5-flourouracil analog (S-1) 80 mg/m2) in day 1, aprepitant and dexa on day 2 and 3, and dexa on day 4.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

S-1 (80 mg/m2) orally x 2 x 3 weeks of a five-week cycle. Cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV on day 8 of each cycle. Antiemetic regimen: aprepitant 125 mg 1 hour before cisplatin plus dexamethasone 9.9 mg IV plus granisetron 3 mg IV 30 minutes before cisplatin infusion on day 1, oral aprepitant 80 mg x 1 & oral dexamethasone 8 mg bid on days 2 and 3, and oral dexamethasone 8 mg bid on day 4. Observations of the patients done 0-120 hours.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 53   
  • AGE: Median = 65 years
  • MALES: 90.6%  
  • FEMALES: 9.4%
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Chemotherapy
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Gastric cancer, chemotherapy naïve, receiving cisplatin and S-1 
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: ECOG performance status of 0-2, not experienced ANV 24 hours before chemotherapy, did not received radiotherapy to the abdomen or pelvis before 1 week, no CNS metastasis, with other medical condition that can induce a risk for vomiting

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Inpatient    
  • LOCATION: 17 institutions of the digestive disease support organization; Japan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active anti-tumor treatment
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care

Study Design

Prospective observational non-comparative study

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Patient self-report of number and timing of any episodes of vomiting or retching; the degree of nausea using a four-point categorical scale (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe, use of rescue therapy (frequency and timing), and change in the amount of diet intake, and completed the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire daily on days 1-5. Safety was assessed by physical examination, toxicity used NCI-CTCAE, version 4.

Results

88.7, 98.1, and 88.7 % achieved complete response (CR) (no emesis, and no rescue antiemetics) in the overall, acute, and delayed phases, respectively. While 67.9, 96.2, and 67.9 % achieved complete protection (CR + no significant nausea). Half of the patients had anorexia, FLIE indicated 79.5% of the patients reported minimal or no impact of CINV on QOL. About half of the patients had some degree of anorexia. 30% of the patients reported decrease volume of diet intake to half and 10% could not consume any food during the delayed phase. Antiemetics therapy was well-tolerated.

Conclusions

Addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy was effective in patients with gastric cancer undergoing treatment with cisplatin and S-1.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)

Nursing Implications

CINV incidence with highly emetogenic chemotherapy is a challenge. A combination of a recommended JSCO guidelines of aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone was well tolerated and very effective in preventing CINV for patients with gastric cancer receiving cisplatin.