Massage therapy involves the manipulation of the soft-tissue with various hand movements (e.g., rubbing, kneading, pressing, rolling, slapping, tapping). Massage therapy can elicit a relaxation response as measured by decreases in heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration. Often, massage is complemented with aromatherapy (i.e., essential oils combined with a carrier cream or oil to manipulate the soft tissues). Aromatherapy has been used together with massage in some studies. An aromatherapy massage is massage therapy delivered by a therapist while aromatherapy oils are administered by inhalation. Massage with or without aromatherapy has been studied in patients with cancer for management of anxiety, caregiver strain and burden, constipation, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, depression, lymphedema, pain, sleep-wake disturbances, and fatigue.
Fellowes, D., Barnes, K., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Aromatherapy and massage for symptom relief in patients with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002287.
To evaluate the effectiveness of massage and aromatherapy for symptom relief in patients with cancer
The search used the following sources from 1966–2002: MEDLINE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, and CancerLit.
Ten reports met the inclusion criteria; eight randomized controlled trials that included 357 patients were reviewed.
While there is sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of massage in decreasing anxiety in patients with cancer, there is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of aromatherapy massage for patients with cancer. Further research is needed.
Pan, Y.Q., Yang, K.H., Wang, Y.L., Zhang, L.P., & Liang, H.Q. (2014). Massage interventions and treatment-related side effects of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 829–841.
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
Studies included those with combined exercise and massage, support and massage for lymphedema, reflexology, foot massage, and aquatherapy. Eight randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) assessed effects on anxiety, and a meta-analysis showed no significant effect of massage on anxiety. Three RCTs looked at effects on fatigue, and a meta-analysis showed improvements in fatigue (SMD = -0.61, p = 0.01). Four RCTs looked at pain, and a meta-analysis showed improvement in pain (SMD = -0.33, p = 0.07, 95% CI -0.69,-0.03).
The evidence from this meta-analysis suggested that massage interventions may be beneficial in the management of fatigue and pain for women with breast cancer. The results did not suggest effectiveness for anxiety.
The specific effects of massage alone were difficult to identify because most studies included other interventions along with massage. The types of massages used were different, and there was no accommodation for the use of medications. There was high heterogeneity among the studies that examined effects on fatigue. The studies included had multiple methodologic flaws. Several studies were counted twice or more in the meta-analysis. Although different outcomes were reported, it was clear from the data that the study sample was the same in different publications.
Massage is a low-risk intervention that may be beneficial in combating fatigue among patients with cancer. This analysis provided evidence in support of massage; however, this was particularly strong given the study design flaws, the variability in types of massage, and the other interventions that were included in the analysis at various phases of cancer care. Additional well-designed research on massage would be helpful to clarify clinical applicability.
Shin, E.S., Seo, K.H., Lee, S.H., Jang, J.E., Jung, Y.M., Kim, M.J., & Yeon, J.Y. (2016). Massage with or without aromatherapy for symptom relief in people with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD009873.
STUDY PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of massage and aromatherapy massage on symptoms in people with cancer
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
APPLICATIONS: Palliative care
Results of the meta-analysis showed no significant differences between massage and no massage for pain, depression, fatigue, or nausea. A meta-analysis of three studies showed significantly lower state anxiety with massage (MD = 18.6, p = 0.0003); however, all studies had very small samples and a high risk of bias. At longer follow-up, no differences were reported between groups in anxiety.
Insufficient evidence exists to show a benefit of massage therapy with or without aromatherapy for the relief of multiple symptoms in people with cancer.
Evidence regarding the effects of massage and aromatherapy massage on various patient symptoms did not show substantial clinical benefit, and evidence is insufficient. However, massage is generally a very low-risk intervention that may provide very short-term benefits for some patients. Additional well-designed research is needed to determine the role of this type of intervention as part of symptom management among patients with cancer at various times in the cancer trajectory.
Thrane, S. (2013). Effectiveness of integrative modalities for pain and anxiety in children and adolescents with cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 30, 320–332.
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
APPLICATIONS: Pediatrics
Integrative interventions may be very effective for pain and anxiety in children undergoing cancer treatment. Integrative modalities, however, warrant further study with larger sample sizes to better determine their effectiveness in this population.
This study provided some evidence that complementary modalities can help children undergoing cancer treatment or painful procedures. The usefulness of a particular method should be further examined.
Wilkinson, S., Barnes, K., & Storey, L. (2008). Massage for symptom relief in patients with cancer: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63, 430–439.
To assess the evidence regarding massage as a means of improving the physical and psychological well-being of patients with cancer
After elimination of duplicates from the initial search, investigators considered 1,321 references. Of these, investigators chose 10 studies for analysis, using the Jadad scoring approach and CONSORT Statement to appraise study quality. Investigators also used sample size and duration of follow-up to evaluate studies. Given the range of massage techniques and patients, meta-analysis was impossible. Three investigators reviewed studies independently.
The authors stated that results were inconclusive; however, reported results showed that massage had a preponderantly positive effect in regard to anxiety reduction.
Two studies included in the review used a crossover design, and one of these showed significant results after massage but not after the control period. This suggests that crossover design may be particularly applicable to this area of research and that the effects of massage are immediate and time sensitive.
Campeau, M.P., Gaboriault, R., Drapeau, M., Van Nguyen, T., Roy, I., Fortin, B., . . . Nguyen-Tan, P.F. (2007). Impact of massage therapy on anxiety levels in patients undergoing radiation therapy: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology, 5(4), 133–138.
To assess the impact of massage therapy on intermediate-term anxiety in patients undergoing radiation therapy
Patients were randomized to massage therapy and control groups. Patients in the massage therapy group rated anxiety before and after massage sessions, and control patients rated their anxiety 15 minutes before radiation treatment. All massage sessions took place before the radiation treatment over 10 consecutive days. Massage consisted of a 15-minute chair massage with a combination of effleurage and petrissage. Patients did not disrobe for the therapy, and no lotion was used. Massage therapists participated in a training course specifically targeting the care of patients with cancer. All therapy was standardized, but was adapted as necessary to avoid any massage to the treatment field. The massage therapist assessed anxiety in all patients using a visual analog scale (VAS) every day during the study.
Active treatment phase
A randomized controlled trial design was used.
The mean VAS score before massage was 4.0 and after massage was 2.2, which was a 45% decrease in anxiety (p < 0.001). Patients in the massage group showed a 15% decrease in anxiety scores from the first to the last session, and patients in the control group experienced a 19% decrease over the same time interval. Both groups had similar scores for state and trait anxiety at baseline. There were no differences in state anxiety between groups at the last session, indicating no intermediate effects on anxiety. VAS scores declined over time for both groups.
Massage therapy as used in this study was associated with a significant immediate reduction in anxiety, but appears to have little or no effect on intermediate-term anxiety. Anxiety over the course of radiation treatment declined for both groups.
Findings suggest that a brief chair massage can be effective for immediate reduction in anxiety, and this may be helpful for certain patients who are very anxious in beginning treatments. Because anxiety in all patients declined over time, and all subjects were seen by a massage therapist prior to each treatment, it may suggest that regular attention to anxiety in interaction with patients may be helpful for anxiety reduction over the course of treatment. This is an area that could be studied. The length and type of massage could influence findings, suggesting that further research in this area should incorporate evaluation of various types and duration of massage.
Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Ironson, G., Beutler, J., Vera, Y., Hurley, J., . . . Fraser, M. (2005). Natural killer cells and lymphocytes increase in women with breast cancer following massage therapy. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115, 495–510.
The intervention was five weeks of massage therapy sessions for 30 minutes per session. Massages were given three times per week, for a total of 15 massages (control group).
A longitudinal randomized controlled trial design was used.
Anxiety was reduced in the massage group on STAI (p < 0.05) after the first and last sessions (decreased by 25%).
Jane, S.W., Chen, S.L., Wilkie, D.J., Lin, Y.C., Foreman, S.W., Beaton, R.D., . . . Liao, M.N. (2011). Effects of massage on pain, mood status, relaxation, and sleep in Taiwanese patients with metastatic bone pain: A randomized clinical trial. Pain, 152, 2432–2442.
To compare the efficacy of massage therapy to a social attention condition in Taiwanese patients with cancer with bone metastases
The study was a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
This trial documented therapeutic effects of massage on improving pain intensity, mood status, and muscle relaxation in patients with metastatic bone pain. The study has clinical implications supporting massage therapy and other medical modalities for optimal improvement in patients with cancer with bone metastases.
Massage therapy may play an important role in cancer bone pain, sleep, and, mood.
Johnson, J.R., Crespin, D.J., Griffin, K.H., Finch, M.D., & Dusek, J.A. (2014). Effects of integrative medicine on pain and anxiety among oncology inpatients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2014, 330–337.
To investigate the effectiveness of integrative medicine therapies on pain and anxiety among patients with cancer
The integrative medicine (IM) therapies included in this study were in three different categories, (a) bodywork, which included craniosacral therapy, medical massage, and reflexology, (b) mind-body and energy (MBE) therapies, which were further divided into separate categories, and (c) traditional Chinese medicine, which included acupressure, acupuncture, and Korean hand therapy. Patients could receive therapy from one category or from more than one in combination therapy.
This retrospective, observational study collected data from electronic medical records.
The results of this study indicated that IM therapies need more extensive research to validate findings, suggesting a correlation between improved self-reported pain and anxiety scores and use of these therapies alone or in combination.
Nurses in the oncology inpatient and outpatient settings are instrumental in research evaluating pain management techniques such as IM therapies. Nurses conduct, lead, and participate in every aspect of these studies evaluating patient outcomes from pain management interventions for patients with cancer. Observational studies and qualitative research will be instrumental in developing future evidence-based guidelines.
Karagozoglu, S., & Kahve, E. (2013). Effects of back massage on chemotherapy-related fatigue and anxiety: Supportive care and therapeutic touch in cancer nursing. Applied Nursing Research, 26, 210–217.
To determine efficacy of back massage on fatigue and anxiety in patients receiving chemotherapy
Before chemotherapy infusions were started, patients completed study data collection in face-to-face interviews. During chemotherapy administrations, patients in the intervention group received a back massage for 15 minutes before the infusions and between 25–40 minutes of each one-hour period of chemotherapy administration. Data collection was repeated immediately after the massage intervention, and patients were interviewed by phone 24 hours after the chemotherapy treatment for the completion of postintervention data collection. Patients were not randomly assigned to treatment and control groups.
Quasi-experimental, cross-sectional cohort study
Fatigue scores were significantly different between groups at baseline and higher in the control group the day after chemotherapy. There were no significant differences between groups in the change of fatigue pre- and postintervention. Mean anxiety scores in the control group increased after chemotherapy while those in the intervention group declined. Differences between groups were not statistically significant.
Findings provide limited evidence that back massages may be helpful in reducing anxiety and fatigue experienced during treatment with chemotherapy.
Massage is a low-risk intervention that may be helpful to some patients during active chemotherapy treatment to reduce anxiety or fatigue. This study, however, does not provide strong supportive evidence due to multiple study design limitations.
Kutner, J.S., Smith, M.C., Corbin, L. Hemphill, L., Benton, K., Mellis, B.K., . . . Fairclough, D.L. (2008). Massage therapy versus simple touch to improve pain and mood in patients with advanced cancer: A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 369–379.
To test the hypothesis that massage would decrease pain and analgesic medicine use
Patients were randomly assigned to a massage treatment group or to a control group in which patients received simple touch controlled for time and attention. Individual baseline data for disease characteristics, pain, symptom distress, quality of life, functional status, expectations from massage, and concurrent interventions were collected within 72 hours of study inclusion and at three weekly visits over the three to four weeks of study participation for measurement of sustained effects. Data collectors were blinded to study group assignment. Participants received up to three 30-minute treatments over two weeks, with at least 24 hours between treatment sessions, according to a schedule jointly determined by the patient and the treatment provider. Treatment providers obtained immediate outcome data prior to and following each treatment. All participants received routine care in addition to study interventions. Massage intervention included gentle effleurage, petrissage, and myofascial trigger point release. Most frequently massaged areas were neck and upper back, arms, hands, lower legs, and feet. Massages were performed by licensed massage therapists who had at least six months’ experience working with patients with advanced cancer. Control touch included placement of both hands on the participant bilaterally on the neck, shoulder blades, lower back, calves, heels, clavicles, lower arms, hands, patellae, and feet with light and consistent pressure. All treatment providers had standardized hands-on training and were evaluated for competency.
A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial design was used.
Both massage and touch were associated with significant improvements in immediate and sustained pain outcomes. Massage was superior to touch, but the difference was not statistically significant. Both groups demonstrated statistical, but not clinically significant, improvement in BPI scores. Both massage and simple touch were reported to be associated with statistically significant immediate improvement in mood, with massage showing statistically superior effect compared to touch. Confidence intervals were provided but significance levels were not reported. Both groups demonstrated improvement in physical and emotional symptom distress and quality of life across weekly evaluations, but there were no differences between groups. There were no adverse effects associated with the interventions, and no differences in general adverse events or mortality between groups. Differences in pain medication use were not reported.
Both massage and simple touch appeared to have immediate beneficial effects on pain and mood in these patients. Both groups experienced slight improvement in pain, quality of life, and symptom distress over time. These changes were minimal, showing statistical significance but not clinical relevance.
Simple touch appeared to have a short-term positive effect on patient mood and pain experience. This is an intervention that should be easy to provide for patients, and could be something that caregivers could also be educated to provide. This intervention could be useful for intermittent use as an adjunct to other interventions for pain management. Formal massage did not provide significantly greater effects. Given findings of simple touch in the population studied here, evaluation of this approach in other patient groups can be useful.
Post-White, J., Kinney, M.E., Savik, K., Gau, J.B., Wilcox, C., & Lerner, I. (2003). Therapeutic massage and healing touch improve symptoms in cancer. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 2, 332–344.
To determine if massage therapy and healing touch were effective in reducing anxiety, mood disturbance, pain, fatigue, and nausea and in improving the relaxation and satisfaction with care of patients receiving chemotherapy treatment
Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic massage, healing touch, or caring presence. All received four weekly 45-minute sessions of the intervention and four weeks of standard care (control). After four weeks, patients were crossed over to another intervention or the control. Order of the intervention and usual-care control were randomized. Pre- and post-assessments of pain, nausea, and vital signs were done at each session. Assessments of intervention effects were done at the beginning and end of each four-week session. Therapeutic massage was provided in a standardized fashion, using a Swedish massage protocol. Healing touch followed a previously developed protocol incorporating centering, unruffling, magnetic unruffling, full-body connection, mind clearing, chelation, and lymphatic drain. Presence consisted of patients lying down for 45 minutes with relaxing music and the presence of a therapist. The therapist asked patients how they were feeling and if they had any questions. Conversation may or may not have occurred, according to the patient’s preference; the purpose of the therapist was to be attentive but to avoid therapy or physical intervention. The control condition consisted of usual care, which the authors did not describe.
Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
A randomized, controlled, parallel-group, crossover design was used.
Massage therapy and healing touch were more effective than presence alone or standard care in improving mood, reducing anxiety, pain, and fatigue and in reducing heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate immediately postintervention.
Massage therapy and therapeutic touch can be beneficial to patients because the interventions induce physical relaxation and reduce pain, fatigue, and anxiety. In this study, these interventions were more effective in this regard than was therapeutic presence alone. Massage therapy and therapeutic touch are complementary therapies that nurses can consider and advocate for on behalf of patients who may benefit from them.
Rosenbaum, M.S., & Velde, J. (2016). The effects of yoga, massage, and reiki on patient well-being at a cancer resource center [Online exclusive]. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 20, E77–E81.
To evaluate the effects of yoga, massage, and Reiki therapies on stress, pain, anxiety, mood, overall health, and quality of life (QOL)
Data were collected from patients who self-enrolled in yoga, Reiki, and massage services during a six-month period. Patients completed study questionnaires before and after participating in one of these services, within one to three minutes before and after participation.
The time patients had been participating in the service ranges from one month to more than three years. Significant changes in pain levels pre- and postservice provision were reported (p < 0.001). Individuals receiving Reiki had higher preservice pain levels. Center staff encouraged patients with pain to enroll in Reiki. No significant postservice differences in pain across the intervention types were reported. All patients reported lower anxiety scores after receiving the service (p < 0.001) with no differences between groups.
Integrative therapies such as Reiki, massage, and yoga may be helpful for management of symptoms such as pain and anxiety.
This study has numerous limitations and high risk of bias, so no firm conclusions can be drawn about the actual efficacy of the interventions being evaluated.
Serfaty, M., Wilkinson, S., Freeman, C., Mannix, K., & King, M. (2012). The ToT study: Helping with Touch or Talk (ToT): A pilot randomised controlled trial to examine the clinical effectiveness of aromatherapy massage versus cognitive behaviour therapy for emotional distress in patients in cancer/palliative care. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 563–569.
To pilot a randomized trial examining the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and aromatherapy massage (AM) in reducing emotional distress in patients with cancer and to compare the differences in effectiveness between the CBT and AM groups
Participants were randomized to one of two treatment groups: CBT or AM. The study did not explain how the CBT intervention was actually implemented, except to note that trained and accredited therapists delivered the therapy. The study listed the topics covered in the CBT sessions but did not describe the procedures, group-session format, etc. AM was described as standard massage with 20 essential oils, delivered by a trained aromatherapist, in a quiet room with minimal talking. Each group received one of these interventions along with “treatment as usual” (standard care). Both groups were offered, after study entry, up to eight one-hour sessions delivered over 10 weeks. Time interval between treatments was not delineated.
Patients were undergoing multiple phases of care.
The study, a pilot, was a randomized, single-blind, prospective, repeated-measure clinical trial with no control group. Measures were collected at baseline and at three and six months postintervention.
The study was drastically underpowered, with too small a sample to allow researchers to draw meaningful conclusions. The study produced no statistically significant findings.
AM may be beneficial as a treatment for short-term anxiety. This poorly designed and controlled pilot study offers no other immediate nursing implication.
Smith, M.C., Kemp, J., Hemphill, L., & Vojir, C.P. (2002). Outcomes of therapeutic massage for hospitalized cancer patients. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34, 257–262.
To examine the effects of therapeutic massage on pain, sleep quality, symptom distress, and anxiety in patients hospitalized for treatment of cancer
Patients who received massage had 15–20 minutes of light Swedish massage techniques of effleurage and petrissage three times during one week of hospitalization. Each session was given at least 24 hours apart. The control condition was 20 minutes of deliberate focused communication from a nurse. Discussions involved patient teaching, relaxation techniques, questions about cancer and treatment, life challenges, and stress reduction.
Active treatment phase
A quasi-experimental design was used.
Provision of therapeutic massage in hospitalized patients with cancer may have a positive effect on pain and symptom distress.
This study did not provide any strong support for the use of therapeutic massage in hospitalized patients with cancer.
Soden, K., Vincent, K., Craske, S., Lucas, C., & Ashley, S. (2004). A randomized controlled trial of aromatherapy massage in a hospice setting. Palliative Medicine, 18, 87–92.
To evaluate the effects of massage and aromatherapy on pain scores (primary aim), and to improve sleep, reduce anxiety and depression, and improve overall quality of life (secondary aims), in patients with advanced cancer
The intervention was a course of massage therapy with and without an essential oil (aromatherapy). Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups:
Major hospitals and hospices in the United Kingdom
A randomized controlled trial design was used.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups—aromatherapy or massage—in anxiety reduction (p = 0.95–1.0).
Sturgeon, M., Wetta-Hall, R., Hart, T., Good, M., & Dakhil, S. (2009). Effects of therapeutic massage on the quality of life among patients with breast cancer during treatment. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15, 373–380.
To test hypotheses regarding the effect of massage on anxiety, pain, nausea, sleep, and quality of life (QOL).
Patients were referred by their physicians and were provided a physician order for massage. Patients completed self-administered instruments prior to massage therapy and one week after therapy. Massage treatments lasted 30 minutes and were provided during treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RT) once per week for three weeks.
Patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
The study used a pre-/posttest design.
STAI scores were lower after massage therapy (p = 0.03). Sleep scale items that showed improvement with massage were soundness of sleep (p = 0.05), time from settling down to sleeping (p = 0.02), and overall sleep satisfaction (p = 0.01). FACT-B scores also showed improvement in several areas after massage therapy (p < 0.05). Effect sizes in these areas were moderate (≥0.3).
Provision of massage therapy during treatment for breast cancer may reduce anxiety and improve sleep and aspects of QOL.
Massage therapy may assist women undergoing breast cancer treatment to better tolerate the impact of treatment, reduce anxiety, and improve sleep during active treatment.
Sui-Whi, J., Wilkie, D.J., Galulucci, B.B., Beaton, R.D. & Hsiu-Ying, H. (2005). Effects of massage on pain intensity, anxiety, and physiologic relaxation in Taiwanese patients with metastatic bone pain. Oncology Nursing Foundation Ninth National Conference on Cancer Nursing Research. Retrieved from http://www.ons.org/publications/journals/ONF/Volume34/Issue1/pdf/ResCon…
This intervention was a 30-minute, full-body massage delivered by the first author after completing pre-test. After the intervention, the participant was instructed to lie quietly for 30 minutes before completing the post-test.
Massage was shown to have effective, immediate, short-term (20–30 minutes; a 61% reduction in anxiety), intermediate (1–2.5 hours), and long-term benefits (16–18 hours) on present pain intensity and anxiety. The most significant reduction in anxiety occurred 15–20 minutes after the intervention. The results from ANOVA revealed a time effect of massage on anxiety visual analog score across time at a statistically significant level (F [10, 20] = 10.3, p < 0.001).
Toth, M., Marcantonio, E.R., Davis, R.B., Walton, T., Kahn, J.R., & Phillips, R.S. (2013). Massage therapy for patients with metastatic cancer: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 19, 650–656.
To determine the feasibility and effects of providing therapeutic massage at home for patients with metastatic cancer
The study shows that therapeutic massage at home is a feasible intervention. However, its effects on anxiety or pain were not conclusive. The small and uneven sample sizes across groups are a major weakness of the study. Although two measures were used for anxiety, the authors did not state which measures were used for the main analysis. Validity of measurements (i.e., alertness, and quality-of-life measure) is also problematic.
The role of nurses for this intervention is not clear. The massage therapy given in the present study was a professional intervention.
Wilkinson, S.M., Love, S.B., Westcombe, A.M., Gambles, M.A., Burgess, C.C., Cargill, A., . . . Ramirez, A.J. (2007). Effectiveness of aromatherapy massage in the management of anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 532–539.
The intervention was a four-week course of one-hour aromatherapy massage offered in National Health Service cancer care settings in the United Kingdom. Patients were recruited and randomized to the intervention group or the control group. The primary variable was change in anxiety and/or depression between full case and borderline and noncase at 10 weeks postrandomization. Diagnostic assessments were tape-recorded, and regular consensus meetings were held to ensure consistency of the diagnostic rating. The secondary variable was self-reported anxiety using the State Subscale of the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI).
Four cancer centers and one hospice in England (National Health Service cancer care settings)
A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial design was used.
State Anxiety Inventory (SAI)–State Subscale measured at 6 and 10 weeks
Patients receiving aromatherapy massage experienced a significant improvement in anxiety at two weeks after intervention, and this was maintained at six weeks after intervention. The reduction of anxiety (by SAI) in the patients receiving usual care plus aromatherapy massage was at a confidence interval of 95% (p = 0.04) both at 6 weeks and 10 weeks.
The results of this trial suggest that aromatherapy massage is an effective therapeutic option for the short-term management of mild to moderate anxiety in patients with cancer.
The study required specialized training in aromatherapy massage.