Weinstein, C., Jordan, K., Green, S.A., Camacho, E., Khanani, S., Beckford-Brathwaite, E., . . . Rapoport, B. L. (2016). Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: Results of a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. Annals of Oncology, 27, 172–178. 

DOI Link

Study Purpose

To assess the efficacy and safety of a single dose of fosaprepitant (150 mg IV) combined with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid versus a standard 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients received fosaprepitant versus placebo with ondansetron plus dexamethasone on day 1. Oral ondansetron and dexamethasone were used. Patients who received fosaprepitant on day 1 received placebo medication on days 2–3, while those in the control group received ondansetron every 12 hours. Rescue medications were allowed at the discretion of the provider.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 1,000   
  • MEAN AGE = 59.6 years
  • MALES: 40.6% in experimental group, 41.2% in standard group; FEMALES: 59.4% (experimental group), 58.8% (standard group)
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Chemotherapy
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Multiple malignancies
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Patients who were treatment naïve and receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: Conducted at 125 sites across 30 countries

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care, palliative care 

Study Design

  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Nausea and the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE)—the research does not discuss how this was administered.  
  • Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.
  • Events of clinical interest (reactions, thrombophlebitis, infusion-site pain, erythema, and induration) were recorded.

Results

Complete response (CR) in delayed phase met superiority for the experimental fosaprepitant group versus the control group (p < 0.001) and for the overall phase (p < 0.001). Both regimens had high CR in the acute phase with no significant differences (p = 0.184). Fosaprepitant was superior to the control group for no vomiting in the overall phase (p < 0.001) and delayed phase (p < 0.001), and the time to first vomiting (p < 0.001). Fosaprepitant group had significantly more “no significant nausea” patients than the control group (p = 0.026).

Conclusions

Fosaprepitant demonstrated superior CR overall to oral ondansetron and dexamethasone alone in MEC regimens. These results are similar to results seen in highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Treatment differences of 0.1% in delayed and overall phases are seen to be clinically meaningful for patients.

Limitations

  • Measurement/methods not well described
  • How often instruments were completed is unknown.
  • Industry supported trial (Merck & Co, Inc.)
  • Several authors are either employed, stockholders, and/or paid consultants of Merck & Co.

Nursing Implications

Fosaprepitant may be safely used in patients receiving MEC. Further study is warranted.