Skip to main content

Kaushal, J., Gupta, M.C., Kaushal, V., Bhutani, G., Dhankar, R., Atri, R., & Verma, S. (2010). Clinical evaluation of two antiemetic combinations palonosetron dexamethasone versus ondansetron dexamethasone in chemotherapy of head and neck cancer. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(11), 871–875.

Study Purpose

To compare the antiemetic effectiveness of palonosetron plus dexamethasone (PD) versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone (OD) for patients with head and neck cancer receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients with head and neck cancer who were receiving a standardized MEC regimen (60 mg/m² IV docetaxel, 300 mg/m² IV carboplatin, and 600 mg/m² IV 5-flurouracil) were randomly assigned to one of two groups. During the first cycle of chemotherapy, group one received palonosetron plus dexamethasone (PD) as antiemetic prophylaxis therapy and group two received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (OD) as antiemetic prophylaxis therapy. For the second cycle, the groups crossed over and group one received OD as antiemetic prophylaxis therapy and group two received PD as antiemetic prophylaxis therapy. The efficacy of the antiemetic prophylaxis medication combinations was evaluated at each of the two cycles of chemotherapy by recording the intensity of nausea and the frequency of vomiting. These outcome variables were evaluated during three phases of treatment: the acute phase beginning at chemotherapy administration and ending 24 hours after, the delayed phase beginning 24 hours after chemotherapy administration and ending five days after, and overall for the five days following chemotherapy administration.

Sample Characteristics

  • The sample consisted of 30 patients who had been diagnosed with head and neck cancer receiving MEC (60 mg/m2 IV docetaxel, 300 mg/m2 IV carboplatin, and 600 mg/m2 IV 5-FU).
  • Patients' ages ranged from 25–60 years.
  • Mean age and gender of patients was not reported.

Setting

The study was conducted at a single outpatient site at a large medical center in India.
 

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

All patients were in active treatment.

Study Design

The study used a randomized, crossover design.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Patients recorded each instance of emesis over the five-day, post-chemotherapy period and the intensity of their nausea using a four-point, descriptive ordinal scale ranging from no nausea to severe nausea.

Results

No significant differences were found between groups for any of the study outcomes (emesis frequency and nausea intensity) in any of the treatment phases (acute phase, delayed phase, and overall).

Conclusions

No difference was found in antiemetogenic efficacy between the PD and OD groups.

Limitations

The study sample was small with fewer than 100 patients.

Nursing Implications

As a second-generation 5-HT3 antagonist, palonosetron, may be more effective in preventing and reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea. Some studies have demonstrated that palonosetron is more effective at reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), while other studies, such as this one, have not. More research must be done before any formulary changes can be proposed.

Print

Kaushal, P., Atri, R., Soni, A., & Kaushal, V. (2015). Comparative evaluation of triplet antiemetic schedule versus doublet antiemetic schedule in chemotherapy-induced emesis in head and neck cancer patients. ecancermedicalscience, 9, 567. 

Study Purpose

To compare the efficacy of triplet versus doublet antiemetic therapy in patients receiving mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) chemotherapy

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized to receive either palonosetron, dexamethasone, and aprepitant, or ondansetron and dexamethasone for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 60
  • MEAN AGE = 51 years
  • AGE RANGE = 34–70 years
  • MALES: 86.6%, FEMALES: 13.4%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: All patients had head and neck cancer.

Setting

  • SITE: Single site  
  • SETTING TYPE: Not specified  
  • LOCATION: India

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment

Study Design

  • Open-label, randomized, prospective trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Count of emesis episodes
  • Nausea measured on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)

Results

Complete response (CR), defined as no vomiting and no rescue medications, was seen in 86.7% of those on triplet therapy and 60% of those on doublet therapy in the acute phase (p < 0.05). In the delayed phase, the CR was 83.3% and 53.3% of those on triplet and doublet therapy respectively (p < 0.05). The authors cited the WHO cost effective and strategic planning guidelines to note that because triplet therapy was more effective, it was cost-effective.

Conclusions

The findings showed that triplet therapy was associated with higher CR rates for CINV prevention than doublet therapy (without an NK1) for patients receiving MEC.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)

 

Nursing Implications

A growing volume of research exists to compare antiemetic regimens with and without NK1s, likely because of the cost of NK1 medication. This study showed that triplet therapy containing NK1 was effective for the control of CINV in a greater proportion of patients than doublet therapy. CINV is a debilitation side effect of chemotherapy. Nurses can advocate for the use of the interventions that are most effective for symptom control among patients receiving MEC and HEC.

Print

Kaufman, M., Singh, G., Das, S., Concha-Parra, R., Erber, J., Micames, C., & Gress, F. (2010). Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 44(2), 127–134.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) celiac plexus block (CPB) and celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) in alleviating chronic abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis (CP) or pancreatic cancer

Search Strategy

  • Databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE. Date range searched was January 1966–December 2007.
  • Search keywords were endoscopic ultrasound, EUS, celiac plexus block, celiac plexus neurolysis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and CP.
  • Studies were included if
    • The reports were published in English.
    • Patients were at least 18 years old and had unremitting chronic abdominal pain due to CP or unresectable pancreatic cancer.
    • Patients needed narcotic analgesics for pain control.
    • The studies had enrolled at least 10 patients who had undergone EUS CPB or CPN.
  • Authors did not cite exclusion criteria.

 

Literature Evaluated

The initial search retrieved 588 articles. Authors selected nine studies for analysis (six of CP pain, three of pain due to pancreatic cancer). The report provides no data regarding quality rating. Of the six studies of CP, three were full articles and three were abstracts. Of the three studies of pancreatic cancer, one was an abstract. Across most studies, methods and procedures were similar. Because current expert consensus precludes the use of absolute alcohol in CPN of patients with CP, due to the potential for inducing fibrosis and limiting future surgical options, authors excluded from the meta-analysis partial data from one study. In this study investigators had used bupivacaine and alcohol in 5 of 19 patients.

Sample Characteristics

  • The sample was composed of 340 patients.
  • Authors did not report sample range.
  • Of all patients, 221 patients had CP and 119 had pancreatic cancer.

Results

EUS CPB for CP was associated with a reduction of abdominal pain in 51% of patients but not with consistent elimination of the need for narcotic analgesics. However, in one study 47% of patients withdrew from narcotics. EUS CPB in CP patients offered temporary relief, up to 48 weeks, in some studies, but short-term pain relief may not indicate long-term effect. EUS CPN for pancreatic cancer pain was associated with a 73% reduction in pain. However, two of three studies reported that narcotic use did not change significantly post-CPN. Analysis of the patients with pancreatic cancer pain showed that the location of the tumor and the timing of EUS CPN were significant factors in the efficacy of the treatment and in pain and narcotics use.

Limitations

  • The number of studies analyzed was small. This could have had some effect on heterogeneity and publication bias.
  • Authors did not provide details regarding pain etiology applicable to studies of CPB in CP.
  • The studies did not track changes in quality of life.
  • Physiologic evaluation for narcotic addiction was not part of the exclusion criteria in any of the studies. Addiction could have contributed to the lack of response in the CPB subgroup.
  • Presentation of meta-analysis results is unclear.

Nursing Implications

Evidence suggests that EUS CPB is somewhat effective in managing the pain of appropriately selected patients. The evidence is not strong, however, and most effects appear to be temporary. EUS CPB is not an effective single method of pain control; EUS CPB may be useful only as a method of achieving temporary relief from acute flares.

Print

Katzer, K., Tietze, J., Klein, E., Heinemann, V., Ruzicka, T., & Wollenberg, A. (2010). Topical therapy with nadifloxacin cream and prednicarbate cream improves acneiform eruptions caused by the EGFR-inhibitor cetuximab–A report of 29 patients. European Journal of Dermatology, 20, 82–84.

Study Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of nadifloxacin and prednicarbate cream for treatment of cetuximab-induced acneiform eruptions

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients who had acneiform eruptions of varying severity were treated with nadifloxacin 1% cream and prednicarbate 0.25% cream once daily for six weeks. Patients continued their usual use of sunscreens, cleansers, and antihistamines. The severity of eruptions was scored at baseline and after one, two, and six weeks of treatment.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 29
  • MEAN AGE = 64.6 years (range = 38–89 years)
  • MALES: 76%, FEMALES: 24%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: All patients were receiving cetuximab

Setting

  • SITE: Single site 
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient 
  • LOCATION: Germany

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment

Study Design

  • Open-label trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Investigator developed skin score calculated from percentage body involvement, percentage facial involvement, and skin lesion scoring on a 3-point scale for erythema and other lesion characteristics.

Results

A significant reduction in skin score was seen at all time points (p < .05). Subjective symptoms such as pruritus, pain, and tenderness were reported to be improved. The treatment was well tolerated. Two patients reported mild burning and erythema following application of the nadifloxacin cream.

Conclusions

The combination of topical quinolone and corticosteroid was effective in reducing acneiform eruptions in this group of patients.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 30)
  • Risk of bias (no control group) 
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)  
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)
  • Measurement validity/reliability questionable
  • Other limitations/explanation: The skin score used is well described, but validity and reliability is not clear.

Nursing Implications

The combination of topical quinolone and steroid may be helpful in treating EGFR-inhibitor associated acneiform rash. This study had several methodological limitations, so it does not provide strong support. Further research in this combination is warranted.

Print

Katz, E., Dugan, N.L., Cohn, J.C., Chu, C., Smith, R.G., & Schmitz, K.H. (2010). Weight lifting in patients with lower-extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer: A pilot and feasibility study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(7), 1070–1076.

Study Purpose

To assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining cancer survivors with lower-extremity lymphedema in an exercise intervention study and to determine preliminary estimates of the safety and efficacy of the intervention
 

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients participated in slow, progressive weight lifting two times weekly, supervised for two months, then unsupervised for three months. Participants were instructed in warm-up, stretching, breathing, weight training and additional stretching exercises by a certified fitness professional. Exercises were performed using variable resistance machines, free weights, and ankle weights.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study sample was comprised of three male and seven female patients; five patients completed the intervention.
  • The study had an upper-age limit of 90 years old.
  • Patients had lower-limb lymphedema, with at least 6% discrepancy in the affected limb and did not have an infection.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

The study has clinical applicability for late effects and survivorship.

Study Design

The study used a pre-post design with no control.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • A Perometer was used to calculate limb volume.
  • Multiple leg circumference measurements were taken.
  • Patients completed a lymphedema survey.
  • A visual analog scale assessed associated pain.
  • Patients completed the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).
  • Patients took six-minute walks.
     

Results

All but one person attended at least 81% of supervised sessions. Five patients did not complete the study because of cellulitis that occurred early in the study, progression of cancer, and inconvenience. There were no significant differences in lower-limb volume. Strength increased and the six-minute walk increased.

Conclusions

The study was too small to draw any conclusions, and the number of drop outs for various reasons makes the feasibility of this approach for patients with lower-limb lymphedema questionable.

Limitations

The sample size was small, with less than 30 participants.

Nursing Implications

 The study is one of few that begins to address lower-limb lymphedema. Further study on the safety and potential benefits of exercise and weight training for this condition are needed.

Print

Katz, M.R., Irish, J.C., & Devins, G.M. (2004). Development and pilot testing of a psychoeducational intervention for oral cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 642–653.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

The intervention involved a 95-page teaching booklet, What to Expect From Your Oral Cancer Surgery: A Guide for Patients and Families. The booklet included information about oral cancer, treatments, and effective coping strategies. Contents were divided into preparing for surgery, postoperative care, and returning home.

In the intervention group, the booklet was given to patients pre- and postoperatively by a nurse experienced in caring for patients with head and neck cancers. The preop session was 60–90 minutes of individual teaching before admission to the hospital for surgery. The predischarge session was 60–90 minutes of individual teaching several days prior to expected discharge from the hospital.

In the control group, patients received standard level of care, which included a preop meeting with the surgeon for consent to treatment as well as a brief description of the illness and treatment. Also included in the preadmission information was a tour of the ward and a team visit from the physician, dietitian, social worker, speech therapist, and enterostomal nurse. No information about coping or emotional difficulties was provided routinely. Measurements were taken at baseline, predischarge, and three months follow-up.

Sample Characteristics

  • The sample was comprised of 19 patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer who were scheduled for their first surgery.
  • The intervention group had 10 patients, and the control (standard care) group had 9 patients.

Setting

  • Hospital setting
  • Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Study Design

A randomized controlled trial design was used.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Demographic/disease history tool
  • Observer-Rated Disfigurement Scale
  • Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST-13): Used to measure history of alcoholism
  • Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey
  • Recent stressful life events checklist for chronically ill populations
  • Knowledge questionnaire to measure oral cancer–related knowledge
  • Stanford Inventory for Cancer Patient Adjustment (SICPA): Used to measure self-efficacy
  • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
  • Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression scale
  • Affect Balance Scale: Used to measure quality of life (QOL)
  • Body Image Scale
  • Atkinson Life Happiness Rating Scale: Used to measure QOL in medically ill populations
  • Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale
  • EORTC QOL questionnaire: Five-item patient satisfaction survey
  • Analysis of stats: Simple ANOVA (group x time interaction)

Results

The authors reported significant improvement in anxiety scores within the intervention group from time 1 to time 3 (t = 2.88, df = 9, p = 0.018).

Limitations

  • The study had a small sample size.
  • The intervention was a booklet created by a psychiatrist, head and neck surgeon, health psychologist, head and neck dietitian, head and neck speech-language pathologist, nurse educator, and medical illustrator, with patient focus groups as reviewers. This would be costly to replicate.
  • An RN spent 60–90 minutes with each patient/family to teach, both preop and predischarge.
Print

Katranci, N., Ovayolu, N., Ovayolu, O., & Sevinc, A. (2012). Evaluation of the effect of cryotherapy in preventing oral mucositis associated with chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16, 339–344.

Study Purpose

To assess the effect of oral cryotherapy on development of oral mucositis associated with infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) with leucovorin

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized to cryotherapy or usual care. Prior to randomization, patients completed a study questionnaire, and 60 patients, who had similar characteristics, were selected for randomization. Ice chips were given to patients in the treatment group 5 minutes before and throughout treatment for a total of 30 minutes of continuous use. Mucositis assessment was done on days 7,14, and 21 after chemotherapy.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study reported on 60 patients. Ages were not stated.
  • The sample was 50% male and 50% female.
  • More than 70% in each group did not brush their teeth, and none had gone to a dentist. All were receiving bolus 5-FU treatment. Patients with oral problems at baseline or head and neck cancer were excluded. Gastric and colon cancers were most common in the sample.
  • Just more than half (53.3%) of patients were elementary school graduates. 

Setting

This was a single-site study conducted in an outpatient setting in Turkey.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Patients were undergoing the active antitumor treatment phase of care.

Study Design

This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Measurement Instruments/Methods

The World Health Organization (WHO) mucositis grading scale was used to assess mucositis severity.

Results

On days 7 and 14, more patients in the experimental group did not have mucositis (p < 0.05). On day 21, patients in the experimental group tended to have lower-grade or grade 0 mucositis, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Findings demonstrated a short-term benefit of cryotherapy in patients receiving 5-FU.

Limitations

  • The sample size was small, with fewer than 100 patients.
  • A risk of bias exists because of the lack of blinding and no appropriate attentional control condition.
  • The findings are not generalizable as no information about usual care was provided. Investigators selected the group of patients for randomization, which could have biased results. This was a group of patients who did not have any normal oral care, such as routine toothbrushing or ongoing dental prophylaxis. Findings may not be applicable to other groups. No information on oral pain, use of pain medication, or use of other interventions for oral care were included.

Nursing Implications

Findings suggest that short-term cryotherapy may be beneficial for patients receiving bolus 5-FU; however, longer-term effectiveness may not be seen.

Print

Kastler, A., Alnassan, H., Pereira, P.L., Alemann, G., Barbe, D.A., Aubry, S., . . . Kastler, B. (2013). Analgesic effects of microwave ablation of bone and soft tissue tumors under local anesthesia. Pain Medicine, 14, 1873–1881.

Study Purpose

To evaluate the probability and usefulness of ablation on pain when performed via local anesthesia

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Lesions targeted included spinal, sacral, and extraspinal. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain from 0–10 pre- and post-procedure, after one week, at 3 months, at 6 months, and at 12 months. Only three patients had data at 12 months.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 15
  • AGE: Not defined
  • MALES, FEMALES: Not defined
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Lesions included spinal, sacral, and extraspinal locations.

Setting

  • SITE: Single site
  • SETTING TYPE: Not specified

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: End-of-life care
  • APPLICATIONS: Palliative care

Study Design

  • Retrospective study

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Visual analog scale from 0–10

Results

The mean ablation time was 4.09 minutes, with an average of 4.2 cycles and mean ablation power of 60 W. Pre-procedure pain score was 7.2 (SD = 0.97). Post-procedure, mean visual analog scale scores were 1.64 on day 0, 1.82 on day 7, and 2.05 by the end of one month. At three months, the mean pain score was 2.13, and at six months, it was 2.36. One patient had no pain relief by one month, and follow-up was discontinued. One patient had a soft tissue abscess at the ablation site, which was drained. No other major or minor complications were found.

Conclusions

Microwave ablation of bone lesions may have some promise for relief of bone pain in patients with cancer.

Limitations

  • Small sample
  • No comparison group
  • No blinding

Nursing Implications

This study suggests that microwave ablation of painful bone lesions may be feasible and may substantially reduce bone pain. This was an extremely small sample. Further well-designed studies are warranted.

Print

Kasseroller, R.G., & Brenner, E. (2010). A prospective randomised study of alginate-drenched low stretch bandages as an alternative to conventional lymphologic compression bandaging. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(3), 343–350.

Study Purpose

To determine whether a difference exists between conventional and alginate bandaging in regard to lower-volume increase or re-filling of the lymphedema when the bandages are applied in periods with reduced decongestive therapy.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

The study included an A group and a B group who received 22 days of treatment with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) including three inpatient weekends. On inpatient weekends low-stretch compression dressing and alginate semi-rigid bandaging were compared. Patients using low-stretch compression dressings (Group A) had bandages applied Friday evening after MLD and then again on Saturday and Sunday after receiving intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC); patients were instructed to not remove bandaging during sleep. Group B used alginate semi-rigid bandages and also were bandaged after MLD on Friday. Patients were instructed to not remove this bandage for the entire weekend. IPC took place in this group with the bandage remaining in place. Volumes were measured prior to bandaging on Friday and then again on Monday prior to MLD.

Sample Characteristics

  • The sample (N = 61) was comprised of female patients with breast cancer.
  • Mean age of patients was 57.4 years ± 8.926, with a range of 28–81.
  • Five patients had a modified mastectomy and 56 had a lumpectomy.
  • Thirty-five patients underwent radiation therapy with three receiving adjuvant therapy.
  • Six months prior to admission in the study, 41 patients underwent non-standardized treatment with MLD and a compression garment.

Setting

  • Single site
  • Inpatient setting
  • Austria

Study Design

The study used a randomized controlled trial design.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Volume measurement by Kuhnke, starting at ulnar styloid process to proximal circumference, was measured every 4 cm.
  • Sonograph of skin thickness at middle-ventral upper arm, middle-ventral forearm, and the middle-back of the hand.

Results

There was a statistical difference between the two groups in terms of volume depletion on days 1–5 (p = 0.010). Days 5–8 had a significantly smaller difference (p = 0.001) and days 8-12 was insignificant. Days 12–15 had a significant statistical difference (p=0.001), days 15–19 not significant, and days 19–22 significant (p = 0.003). All significance was in favor of Group B, although the overall statistics were not significant. In terms of tolerance, Group B using the alginate semi-rigid bandage had a statistically significant difference in comfort on the second (p = 0.0004) and third (p = 0.024) weekends.

Conclusions

Although there was no significant difference in volume depletion for women from Group A to Group B, there was a statistically significant difference in the overall comfort of patients in Group B with the semi-rigid bandaging, which can directly impact the women’s quality of life during treatment for lymphedema.

Limitations

The sample size was small (N < 100).

Nursing Implications

Some positive changes in women with lympedema rely solely on patient education and compliance with exercise. Patient education and physical therapy must be included in after surgery.

Print

Kashiwazaki, H., Matsushita, T., Sugita, J., Shigematsu, A., Kasashi, K., Yamazaki, Y., et al. (2011). Professional oral health care reduces oral mucositis and febrile neutropenia in patients treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Supportive Care in Cancer : Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(2),367-373.

Study Purpose

To evaluate the effects of professional oral health care (POHC) given by dentists and dental hygienists on the development of oral mucositis and FN after allogeneic BMT.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

1.    Pre-BMT, two dentists examined patient’s oral health, including x-rays, baseline hygiene, and clinical exam of hard and soft palate, looking for risk factors for oral infection.  
2.    All dental problems were treated up until HSCT.
3.    Dental hygienist gave mechanical cleaning of the mouth and instructed patients on how to properly clean the mouth and teeth.
4.    During HSCT period, all patients had to be able to perform proper oral hygiene themselves, which included brushing their teeth after every meal and before going to bed and oral rinsing with normal saline solution every three hours during the day.
5.    When xerostomia developed, a mouth-wetting agent containing baking soda was applied locally several times a day.
6.    Dentists and hygienists performed weekly oral exams and POHC on all patients and monitored compliance.
7.    When OM developed, extra-soft toothbrushes were used, and patients gargled with a saline rinse containing lidocaine. Opioids were used for severe OM pain.  
 

Sample Characteristics

The sample was comprised of 140 patients. The median age for non-POHC was 43 (with a range of 15-66 years), n = 62. The median age for POHC was 47 (with a range of 18-77 years), n = 78.   

Males (%): 54; Females (%): 46

Key Disease Characteristics: Adult patients with ALL, AML, MDS, CML, malignant lymphoma, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, MM, and other (6.7%)

Other Key Sample Characteristics:

1.    BMT was done by conventional or reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation.
2.    Conditioning regimens included Fludarbine/Busulfan, Fludarabine/Melphalan, Cytoxan/VP-16/total body radiation, Cytoxan/total body radiation, and others (8.6%).
3.    Cyclosporine A or tacrolimus and short-course methotrexate were given for GVHD prophylaxis.
4.    Median age, administration of Cytoxan/VP16/TBI and GVHD prophylaxis were significantly different between groups.
5.    The number of reduced-intensity stem cell transplant (RIST) was higher in the POHC group.
 

Setting

Site: Inpatient

Location: Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

Phase of Care: Active treatment

Study Design

Retrospective study from February 2002 until December 2009.  Data collected from clinical records.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

1.    OM was graded using the WHO scale.
2.    Daily exams by nurses and physicians per instructions of the dentist in charge and at least weekly confirmation of assessments by dentists. (It is not stated if this is only in the POHC arm, but it is likely only in the POHC group.)
3.    FN was defined as a single axillary temperature of >37.5°C with a peripheral neutrophil count of <0.5 X 109/L.    
 

Results

1.    The incidence of OM was significantly lower in the POHC group (66.7% versus 93.5%).
2.    The incidence of FN and maximal level of CRP were both significantly lower in the POHC group (P < 0.035).
3.    The conditioning regimen and POHC were significantly associated with the incidence of OM in the univariate analysis.
4.    Only POHC remained significant in the multivariate analysis.
 

Conclusions

The incidence of OM in patients with POHC was significantly lower than in those without POHC.

Limitations

Retrospective study

Higher number of RIST patients in the POHC group, which may account for the lower number o f cases of OM seen.

Long time from the non-POHC group and POHC make comparison to historical control less accurate. Additional intervening variables could be responsible for changes seen.

Nursing Implications

1.    This retrospective study helps to support the need for diligent oral hygiene prior to and during OM in high-risk patients.
2.    The intervention in this study is not expensive and does not introduce additional medications to patients, which put the patient at risk for additional side effects.
3.    This study reinforces the use of saline rinses.
4.    FN was lower in the study group, and interventions that can help decrease the incidence of this significant and sometimes deadly side effect of chemotherapy are worth considering (perhaps the risk of infection via the oral cavity was reduced through the use of meticulous mouth care).
5.    This intervention would require education to the patient and the caregivers prior to treatment and monitored during treatment, which oncology nurses are well positioned to do.
6.    This study was done inpatient, and it would be nice to see an outpatient prospective study done to see if the results are the same.
 

Print
Subscribe to